tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5826089456220390915.post162399037008216531..comments2024-03-27T19:28:07.226+01:00Comments on Islam in its own words: IMMATURE RESURRECTION OF GNOSTICISM IN ISLAM, Part IIUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5826089456220390915.post-73632054204576193102012-04-20T10:22:21.731+02:002012-04-20T10:22:21.731+02:00Hello Beo
Concerning the editing, actually this bl...Hello Beo<br />Concerning the editing, actually this blog was intented as my "portable database", for private purpose, that's why you see so much colors etc.etc.<br />;-).https://www.blogger.com/profile/14710652501345555125noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5826089456220390915.post-5201856489098537772012-04-13T22:57:23.701+02:002012-04-13T22:57:23.701+02:00By the way, you use way to much italics and underl...By the way, you use way to much italics and underlining and colors and stuff. Very distracting.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5826089456220390915.post-35526770238736417312012-04-13T22:56:22.656+02:002012-04-13T22:56:22.656+02:00Or is it just misinterpretation of Mo'md's...Or is it just misinterpretation of Mo'md's meaning?<br /><br />He says like "They did not truly kill him, it only appeared so, for God raised him to himself." Couldn't that be interpreted as meaning "He didn't really die, because after he died, God raised him up"? The interpretation that it means an illusory holographic crucifixion or that Judas took Jesus' place, that's all just later Islamic interpretation and not necessarily what Mo'md meant. Just like original sin is later Christian interpretation of Romans 5:12 and not necessarily what Paul meant.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com