A movement is on. Muslims, who have come to realize
that Islam is not what it is believed be the majority, are not only leaving it
but are also speaking out.?
How did Islam come to be what it is today?
What should the modern Muslims do?
Who are the terrorists and what are their goals?
Who better to answer these questions than a man who once believed Islam to be a divine revelation and is now free to share his insights of the real Islam?
Faithfreedom International is a worldwide grassroots movement of ex-Muslims and those who are concerned about the rise of radical Islam. According to Ranking.com, the site faithfreedom.org is listed in between the top 30,000 to 40,000 Web sites! And according to Site Meter, FFI has had over 15 million visitors since 2005. It receives more than 20,000 visitors every day and almost 2 million page views every month. That is a phenomenal web site.
So who runs Faith Freedom Int'l?
Founded by Ali Sina, today this site is run by several ex-Muslim volunteers.
An Iranian, born to Muslim parents, Ali Sina saw the truth of Islam after reading the Quran. ?It was then that he realized why his country that was once a superpower had become a third world country, and how the same fate awaits the rest of the world.? He decided to sound the clarion and let the world know that mankind is in a great peril. What is at stake is the human civilization.
He started writing about his findings and published them on the Internet. More ex-Muslims joined and the trickle became a torrent. Now it is the ex-Muslims that pose a threat to Islam. This explosive site may tear down the tall wall of Islam and unite today’s hostile Muslims with the rest of mankind.
Ali Sina has debated with numerous prominent Islamic scholars, such as?the Grand Ayatollah Montazeri, Javed Ahmed Ghamidi, Maulana Ajmal Qadri, Edip Yusel, etc. and has shown the fallacies of Islam in all his debates.
Sina has never wavered from his goals, to bring to the world attention the threat of Islam and to help Muslims see the truth about their religion.? Thanks to?faithfreedom.org, and Sina’s book, Understanding Muhammad: A Psychobiography of Allah’s Prophet, thousands of Muslims have left Islam, have stopped seeing the non-Muslims as their enemies and have joined the rest of mankind as fellow humans.? Ali Sina believes he has created a cookie cutter that can lead millions of Muslims out of Islam, demolish this faith and end this hate in our own lifetime. ?All it is required, he says, is to spread the truth and Islam will melt like ice in the Arabian Desert.
So grab your favorite drink and make yourself comfortable, as we sit down and talk with the man who has started a silent revolution that if successful may change the course of history.
May I present Mr. Ali Sina.
ITF: First of all I would like to thank you for taking the time to speak to the viewers of the Infidel Task Force. It is quite an honor to have you here.
Sina: Thank you for inviting me.
ITF: Currently the world has 44 different ongoing conflicts with radical Islamic militants. What brought us to this point? Where will it lead to? And how do we stop them?
Sina: Conflict is not strange to Islam. Through fighting and violence Muslims resolve their differences. Do you believe that the Muslim god prescribes fighting to his believers?
Quran 2.216 - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But God knoweth, and ye know not.
Sinc 1492, when Ferdinand and Isabella completed the reconquista of Spain and forced the Muslims out of Granada the expansionist zeal of Muslims came to a halt. Muslims are required to make peace when they are weak and break their peace accords when they are strong. This is based on the example set by Muhammad in Hudaibiyah, where he, seeing the weakness of his army, signed a ten year peace treaty with the Meccans, only to break that treaty, by divine decree, two years later, when he had raided and looted other weaker citadels and had become powerful. To justify this treachery he made his Allah reveal the sura 9 entitled Bara’a (deliverance) and release him from his obligation to honor his treaty.
Quran. 9:3:And an announcement from Allah and His Messenger, to the people (assembled) on the day of the Great Pilgrimage― that Allah and His Messenger dissolve (their treaty) obligations with the pagans.
Imam Suyuti, in Itqan Fi 'Ulum al- Qur'an (Certainty in the science of the Quran) wrote: The command to fight the infidels was delayed until the Muslims become strong, but when they were weak they were commanded to endure and be patient. [Sobhy as_Saleh, Mabaheth Fi 'Ulum al- Qur'an, Dar al-'Ilm Lel-Malayeen, Beirut , 1983, p. 269.]
The reason that after 500 years of relative calm Jihad is back is because Muslims, thanks to the oil and the well paying jobs in the West, are feeling strong and think it is time to flex their religious muscles again.
So there is the answer to your first question: “What brought us to this point?” Oil! Wealth! Quite contrary to what the liberal media wants to make us believe, the cause of Islamic terrorism is not poverty, but the opposite. Muslims have become rich, feel strong, and hence they are under religious obligation to start fighting.
What was the second question?
ITF: My second question is here will it lead to
Sina: That depends on how we respond to them. If we adopt a submissive peaceful posture vis-à-vis their aggression, of course they will be emboldened and we lose. We lose our freedom, our democracy, our civilization and everything humanity has achieved during these last few hundreds of years. Science will be enslaved by an obscurantist religion and the world will sink in the quagmire of Talibanization.
The historian John O’Neill, in a must read tome,The Holy Warriors, has shown that unlike the common misconception, the Dark Ages and the demise of the Classical Civilization did not begin with the invasion of the Vandals and the Goths, the so called barbarians, nor because of the spread of Christianity. The Dark Ages, the inquisition and the holy war, were caused by the Muslim invasion ofEurope. Human civilization has had one thousand years of stagnation because of Islam. If Islam is allowed to conquer the West, Dark Ages will set again. This time humanity may never recover.
This will not be the end of the story. Since Muslims know no other way to resolve their disagreements, except through fighting, in an eventual Islamic world everyone will be fighting with everyone else and there will be mass slaughters worldwide. With the world’s reserves of nuclear weapons in the hands of Muslims, you can imagine what will be the future of mankind.
Muslims will start killing each other because each considers others to be heretics. A Good example is what is happening in Gaza. Muslims in this tiny piece of land are in perpetual war with Israel. Meanwhile, they persecute the Christians and have splinted in dozens of groups, fighting among each other.
The main factions are al Fatah and al Hamas. They are busy killing one another. Then there are: Jaish al-Islam (affiliated with al-Qaida), Fatah al-Islam, Jaish al-Ummah, Jaish Allah, al-Takfir, Lion's Den of Jihad Fighters, Jaljalat (an Arabic term meaning "rolling thunder"), al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade (responsible for shootings, suicide operations including female suicide bombing), Holy Jihad Brigades (responsible for the August 2006 kidnappings of Fox News reporter Steve Centanni and cameraman Olaf Whig in the Gaza Strip), Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades (The militant wing of Hamas), ?Palestine Islamic Jihad, Al-Quds Brigades (the militant wing of Palestinian Islamic Jihad), Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (a Marxist-rooted revolutionary group), Palestine Liberation Front (responsible for hijacking the Italian cruise ship Achille Lauro on Oct. 7, 1985, and killing a wheelchair bound elderly Jewish American, Leon Klinghoffer, and throwing is body and his wheelchair overboard), Abu Ali Mustapha Brigades (the military wing of the Marxist-secular Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine), Popular Resistance Committees (founded by Hezbollah of Lebanon, is an umbrella organization for militants coming from Fatah and joining forces with Hamas-linked groups).
There are many more, and this is just in Gaza. There are thousands of groups in the entire Muslim world that are hostile to each other, fighting and killing one another and calling each other kafir, unislamic and heretic. The only thing that units them is their hatred of non-Muslims and particularly the Jews.
If Islam conquers the world, this is where we are heading – constant war and the assured destruction of mankind.
Now, this may come as a surprise, but fratricide between Muslims is by design. It is as if Muhammad wanted to spread hatred and disunity among his followers and make them kill one another. Muslims will jump to differ and will quote the Quran 3:103 where Muhammad exhorts his followers: "And hold fast, all of you together, to the rope of Allah and be not divided."?However, he laid the foundation for the disunity of his followers. Here is how:
Imam Abu Dawood quoted a Hadith concerning the division of the Muslims into seventy-three sects.
Mu'awiyah ibn Abi Sufyan said, The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) stood among us and said': 'Beware! The People of the Book before (you) were split up into 72 sects, and this community will be split up into 73, seventy-two of them will go to Hell and one of them will go to Paradise.' [Sunan Abu Dawood, 3/4580, English edn):
This hadith is reported also by others. So Muslims believe it is sahih (authentic). The implication is clear. It follows that Muslims will split into many sects and since all but one are false the followers of all but one are heretics and will go to hell.? How the righteous Muslims should treat the heretics? That too is prescribed. Heretics must be killed. Muhammad said those who change the religion or try to reform it and introduce innovation should be killed.
Now, the question is which one of these 73 sects is the right one? Naturally, everyone believes they are the ones. So if every Muslim believes to be right and other Muslims are heretics, doesn’t it follow that Muslims are required to fight with each other?
The truth is that Islam is not divided into 73 sects but into thousands of sects.
I am a rationalist. I do not believe in the supernatural. But for the sake of argument, let us assume Satan is real and hell bent to destroy mankind. What better way could he devise than inventing a religion like Islam and making people kill one another to the last man? Islam is the perfect recipe to end humanity.
ITF: And, how do we stop them?
Sina:
How did Islam come to be what it is today?
What should the modern Muslims do?
Who are the terrorists and what are their goals?
Who better to answer these questions than a man who once believed Islam to be a divine revelation and is now free to share his insights of the real Islam?
Faithfreedom International is a worldwide grassroots movement of ex-Muslims and those who are concerned about the rise of radical Islam. According to Ranking.com, the site faithfreedom.org is listed in between the top 30,000 to 40,000 Web sites! And according to Site Meter, FFI has had over 15 million visitors since 2005. It receives more than 20,000 visitors every day and almost 2 million page views every month. That is a phenomenal web site.
So who runs Faith Freedom Int'l?
Founded by Ali Sina, today this site is run by several ex-Muslim volunteers.
An Iranian, born to Muslim parents, Ali Sina saw the truth of Islam after reading the Quran. ?It was then that he realized why his country that was once a superpower had become a third world country, and how the same fate awaits the rest of the world.? He decided to sound the clarion and let the world know that mankind is in a great peril. What is at stake is the human civilization.
He started writing about his findings and published them on the Internet. More ex-Muslims joined and the trickle became a torrent. Now it is the ex-Muslims that pose a threat to Islam. This explosive site may tear down the tall wall of Islam and unite today’s hostile Muslims with the rest of mankind.
Ali Sina has debated with numerous prominent Islamic scholars, such as?the Grand Ayatollah Montazeri, Javed Ahmed Ghamidi, Maulana Ajmal Qadri, Edip Yusel, etc. and has shown the fallacies of Islam in all his debates.
Sina has never wavered from his goals, to bring to the world attention the threat of Islam and to help Muslims see the truth about their religion.? Thanks to?faithfreedom.org, and Sina’s book, Understanding Muhammad: A Psychobiography of Allah’s Prophet, thousands of Muslims have left Islam, have stopped seeing the non-Muslims as their enemies and have joined the rest of mankind as fellow humans.? Ali Sina believes he has created a cookie cutter that can lead millions of Muslims out of Islam, demolish this faith and end this hate in our own lifetime. ?All it is required, he says, is to spread the truth and Islam will melt like ice in the Arabian Desert.
So grab your favorite drink and make yourself comfortable, as we sit down and talk with the man who has started a silent revolution that if successful may change the course of history.
May I present Mr. Ali Sina.
ITF: First of all I would like to thank you for taking the time to speak to the viewers of the Infidel Task Force. It is quite an honor to have you here.
Sina: Thank you for inviting me.
ITF: Currently the world has 44 different ongoing conflicts with radical Islamic militants. What brought us to this point? Where will it lead to? And how do we stop them?
Sina: Conflict is not strange to Islam. Through fighting and violence Muslims resolve their differences. Do you believe that the Muslim god prescribes fighting to his believers?
Quran 2.216 - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But God knoweth, and ye know not.
Sinc 1492, when Ferdinand and Isabella completed the reconquista of Spain and forced the Muslims out of Granada the expansionist zeal of Muslims came to a halt. Muslims are required to make peace when they are weak and break their peace accords when they are strong. This is based on the example set by Muhammad in Hudaibiyah, where he, seeing the weakness of his army, signed a ten year peace treaty with the Meccans, only to break that treaty, by divine decree, two years later, when he had raided and looted other weaker citadels and had become powerful. To justify this treachery he made his Allah reveal the sura 9 entitled Bara’a (deliverance) and release him from his obligation to honor his treaty.
Quran. 9:3:And an announcement from Allah and His Messenger, to the people (assembled) on the day of the Great Pilgrimage― that Allah and His Messenger dissolve (their treaty) obligations with the pagans.
Imam Suyuti, in Itqan Fi 'Ulum al- Qur'an (Certainty in the science of the Quran) wrote: The command to fight the infidels was delayed until the Muslims become strong, but when they were weak they were commanded to endure and be patient. [Sobhy as_Saleh, Mabaheth Fi 'Ulum al- Qur'an, Dar al-'Ilm Lel-Malayeen, Beirut , 1983, p. 269.]
The reason that after 500 years of relative calm Jihad is back is because Muslims, thanks to the oil and the well paying jobs in the West, are feeling strong and think it is time to flex their religious muscles again.
So there is the answer to your first question: “What brought us to this point?” Oil! Wealth! Quite contrary to what the liberal media wants to make us believe, the cause of Islamic terrorism is not poverty, but the opposite. Muslims have become rich, feel strong, and hence they are under religious obligation to start fighting.
What was the second question?
ITF: My second question is here will it lead to
Sina: That depends on how we respond to them. If we adopt a submissive peaceful posture vis-à-vis their aggression, of course they will be emboldened and we lose. We lose our freedom, our democracy, our civilization and everything humanity has achieved during these last few hundreds of years. Science will be enslaved by an obscurantist religion and the world will sink in the quagmire of Talibanization.
The historian John O’Neill, in a must read tome,The Holy Warriors, has shown that unlike the common misconception, the Dark Ages and the demise of the Classical Civilization did not begin with the invasion of the Vandals and the Goths, the so called barbarians, nor because of the spread of Christianity. The Dark Ages, the inquisition and the holy war, were caused by the Muslim invasion ofEurope. Human civilization has had one thousand years of stagnation because of Islam. If Islam is allowed to conquer the West, Dark Ages will set again. This time humanity may never recover.
This will not be the end of the story. Since Muslims know no other way to resolve their disagreements, except through fighting, in an eventual Islamic world everyone will be fighting with everyone else and there will be mass slaughters worldwide. With the world’s reserves of nuclear weapons in the hands of Muslims, you can imagine what will be the future of mankind.
Muslims will start killing each other because each considers others to be heretics. A Good example is what is happening in Gaza. Muslims in this tiny piece of land are in perpetual war with Israel. Meanwhile, they persecute the Christians and have splinted in dozens of groups, fighting among each other.
The main factions are al Fatah and al Hamas. They are busy killing one another. Then there are: Jaish al-Islam (affiliated with al-Qaida), Fatah al-Islam, Jaish al-Ummah, Jaish Allah, al-Takfir, Lion's Den of Jihad Fighters, Jaljalat (an Arabic term meaning "rolling thunder"), al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade (responsible for shootings, suicide operations including female suicide bombing), Holy Jihad Brigades (responsible for the August 2006 kidnappings of Fox News reporter Steve Centanni and cameraman Olaf Whig in the Gaza Strip), Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades (The militant wing of Hamas), ?Palestine Islamic Jihad, Al-Quds Brigades (the militant wing of Palestinian Islamic Jihad), Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (a Marxist-rooted revolutionary group), Palestine Liberation Front (responsible for hijacking the Italian cruise ship Achille Lauro on Oct. 7, 1985, and killing a wheelchair bound elderly Jewish American, Leon Klinghoffer, and throwing is body and his wheelchair overboard), Abu Ali Mustapha Brigades (the military wing of the Marxist-secular Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine), Popular Resistance Committees (founded by Hezbollah of Lebanon, is an umbrella organization for militants coming from Fatah and joining forces with Hamas-linked groups).
There are many more, and this is just in Gaza. There are thousands of groups in the entire Muslim world that are hostile to each other, fighting and killing one another and calling each other kafir, unislamic and heretic. The only thing that units them is their hatred of non-Muslims and particularly the Jews.
If Islam conquers the world, this is where we are heading – constant war and the assured destruction of mankind.
Now, this may come as a surprise, but fratricide between Muslims is by design. It is as if Muhammad wanted to spread hatred and disunity among his followers and make them kill one another. Muslims will jump to differ and will quote the Quran 3:103 where Muhammad exhorts his followers: "And hold fast, all of you together, to the rope of Allah and be not divided."?However, he laid the foundation for the disunity of his followers. Here is how:
Imam Abu Dawood quoted a Hadith concerning the division of the Muslims into seventy-three sects.
Mu'awiyah ibn Abi Sufyan said, The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) stood among us and said': 'Beware! The People of the Book before (you) were split up into 72 sects, and this community will be split up into 73, seventy-two of them will go to Hell and one of them will go to Paradise.' [Sunan Abu Dawood, 3/4580, English edn):
This hadith is reported also by others. So Muslims believe it is sahih (authentic). The implication is clear. It follows that Muslims will split into many sects and since all but one are false the followers of all but one are heretics and will go to hell.? How the righteous Muslims should treat the heretics? That too is prescribed. Heretics must be killed. Muhammad said those who change the religion or try to reform it and introduce innovation should be killed.
Now, the question is which one of these 73 sects is the right one? Naturally, everyone believes they are the ones. So if every Muslim believes to be right and other Muslims are heretics, doesn’t it follow that Muslims are required to fight with each other?
The truth is that Islam is not divided into 73 sects but into thousands of sects.
I am a rationalist. I do not believe in the supernatural. But for the sake of argument, let us assume Satan is real and hell bent to destroy mankind. What better way could he devise than inventing a religion like Islam and making people kill one another to the last man? Islam is the perfect recipe to end humanity.
ITF: And, how do we stop them?
Sina:
With truth! Islam is a lie. The antidote to lie is truth. We can stop
Islam. This is a lot easier than people think. All we have to do is expose its
fallacies and Muslims will walk away from it. No one wants to believe in a lie.
Once we show them that Muhammad was a psychopath cult leader and that all his
claims are bogus, Islam will become a dead religion in no time. I believe in
the power of truth. Tell the truth and Islam will be destroyed in our own
lifetime.
ITF: Will it not offend their sensitivity?
Sina: To hell with their sensitivity! Tell the truth and save their lives.
ITF: Canada and America both have seen a rise in domestic terror cells. Jamat ul-Fuqra, Hizb-ut-Tahrir, just to name two! They operate openly and with peaceful identities. What are they in reality and why are the governments reluctant to approach them?
Sina: All Muslim groups are terrorists. This does not mean every Muslim is a terrorist. But if someone launches an Islamic group to advance Islam, under any pretext, whether peaceful of not, be careful of his intentions. Muslims fight for the same cause – the domination of Islam and the overthrow of all non Muslim governments. Their modus operandi is different. Some opt direct fighting and others covert fighting.
Last February, a Pakistani American who started a Muslim TV channel in the US to counter negative portrayal of Islam after the 9/11 terror attacks, beheaded his estranged wife in a very Islamic fashion. This man was clean shaven who wore suit and tie and was looking quite westernized and modernized.
A Muslim is a Muslim is a Muslim. Don’t let them confuse you with charades like “Islam is not a monolithic religion,” or “honor killing is cultural,” and other nonsense. A peaceful Muslim is a contradiction in terms. It is an oxymoron. Have you seen a hot ice? There is less chance to find a peaceful Muslim. The very fact that they keep reminding us that Islam is a religion of peace is because it is not. Why the followers of other religions don’t feel such an urge to constantly tell others their religion means peace? The proof of perfume is in its smell, not because it’s written on its label.
Now, don’t get me wrong. I am not saying all Muslims are violent and terrorists. There are many good people who call themselves Muslims. They are the majority. But they are good to the extent that they diverge from Islam. These same good people can turn dangerous when they remember they are Muslims.
Jihad stands on two feet. One is terror and the other is deception or taqiyyah. Both are essential for the advancement of Islam. Which foot you put forward depends on the situation. When Muslims are weak, taqiyyah is the best approach and when they are strong, ro’b (terror) is prescribed. This is sunnah, the example set by Muhammad. He used both terror and deception to advance his cause. Muhammad said war is deception and al nasro fil ro’b (victory is in terror). He bragged, “I have been made victorious with terror”
There is a debate going on among Muslims about whether Islam is strong enough to engage in warfare or not enough strong and therefore Muslims should work their way through deception. Of course, debates in Islam are always bloody, but nonetheless we have to recognize that this is a genuine debate, a la Musulman.
A few years ago, Dr. Mahathir who was the prime minister of Malaysia hosted the summit of Organization of Islamic Conference, where leaders of all 57 Islamic countries attended. In his speech, addressing all Muslims, he lamented that Islam has been associated with terrorism. He spoke of the past glory of Islam and after complaining that Muslims are now oppressed and humiliated. He encouraged them to put aside the fight, advance in science and technology and acquire wealth. And then do what? Build hospitals? Found Universities? Advance human civilization?? Improve Muslims’ life? Nope! Then he suggested that uslims should buy guns and rockets, bombs and warplanes, tanks and warships, destroy their enemies, subdue other nations, and make them kneel again in front of Muslims, as they did during Islam’s golden age.?
Dr. Mahathir was hailed as a moderate Muslim and by all accounts he is. So what is the difference between a moderate Muslim and a terrorist Muslim? The difference is that the latter thinks Muslims are strong enough and the time for Jihad has come while the former believes Muslims are still too weak for that. In essence, Muslims cannot disagree with the concept of Jihad because they would be disagreeing with the Quran. Jihad is a fundamental principle of Islam.
Jamat ul-Fuqra and Hizb-ut-Tahrir have the same goal that al Qaida has: Domination of Islam. The difference is in how they want to achieve this goal. One group wants to use terror now and the other prefers deception for now until Muslims are more powerful.
ITF: Lets talk a bit about Shariah Law. Why do some Western countries allow Sharia Law to be implemented instead of telling Muslims they must live according to the laws already in place? I’m speaking of the case in point in the UK.
Sina: Corruption my dear! Corruption of your politicians!? Politicians want the votes of Muslims and they will sell their mother for it. A good example is the new scandal surrounding the release of the Lockerbie bomber, Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi that involves the UK Prime Minister Brown.
The government of Britain made a mockery of justice and the memory of 300 people perished in that bombing when they released the terrorist Megrahi, to make a lucrative deal with?Libya.? This may surprise the British, but it does not surprise me. I am an Iranian. The British governments, have always looked the other way and sacrificed the human rights in Iran to make lucrative deals with the dictators of that county, and turned against them when those deals went elsewhere. In 1953 the British conspired to oust the democratic prime minister of Iran, Dr. Mossadeq, and reinstated the inexperienced and easily controllable Mohammad Reza Shah. Twenty six years later they turned against him and backed Khomeini and the tyrannical mullahs, when the Shah matured and tried to demonstrate his independence. Then for thirty years they supported one of the most brutal regimes in the world, knowing everything about the tortures, rapes in prisons, executions and all human rights abuses that their thuggish business partners were committing in?Iran. None of that mattered to the consecutive British governments. As long as the lucrative deals were coming, they turned a blind eye to all human rights abuses. But now that Russia and China have managed to win the mullahs to their side and the Brits are left in the cold, the British government is against the Islamic regime.
Shameless politicians will sell their wife, daughter and mother, not just their humanity and their country, in order to stay in power. Muslims take full advantage of that to strengthen their foothold in western countries. You will be defeated because your politicians are traitors.? It is time for a new generation of politicians to rise – politicians who put their country first, defend its laws, its constitution, its democratic values and its heritage. But this new breed of politicians will only rise when people support them. This consciousness must arise from the grassroots. For decades the western mind has been contaminated with leftist propaganda and now we are seeing the result. Islamism is expanding and the western civilization is disintegrating.
There is one man in Europe who has stood for Europe. He is Geert Wilder. Behold how the European leftist media vilifies him and equates him to Hitler. Remember how the unforgettable Oriana Fallaci, who stood for the west and its Judeo-Christian heritage, was treated by the courts in her own country, Italy.
You have a disease within your countries. It is called liberalism. It produces a toxin known as political correctness, and a venom called multiculturalism that poison your entire society. This disease affects your immune system and makes you vulnerable to your external and internal enemies. It has infected all democratic countries, from India to Europe and now it has spread to the US, affecting its very heart.
If you want to defend your country from Islamization, you have to flush out your system from liberalism. You need to take the power away from those who are selling out your country and vote for patriotic servants of the people who are not afraid to call a spade a spade and do not fear to stand up against Muslims and their effort to Islamize your country.
The Sharia must be outlawed not just because it is anti constitutional, but also anti American and anti human. The Sharia is an insult to humanity - an assault to women. Every bit of it is a violation of human rights.
Construction of mosques must be banned. Mosques are places where Muslims are indoctrinated to hate their fellow non-Muslim citizens. Banning the construction of mosques is in conformity with Islam. Muslims do not allow building Hindu temples, churches or any other non Muslim house of worship in their Islamic countries.
Why should we allow a religion to grow in our midst when we know that if they come to power they will take our freedom away from us?
Then you have to start a campaign to inform people about Islam and to rescue those trapped in this gigantic web of deception. I am not saying that governments should do this, but they should not stand in the way of those who want to use their right to free speech and threaten them with penalties.
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/36272-protesters-threaten-bloodshed-over-hindu-temple
Once Muslims leave Islam they can be as trustworthy and patriotic as anyone else. As long as they are Muslims you have to watch their every move with suspicion. Muslims’ loyalty is not to their country, but to Islam. They have a duty to destroy the non-Muslim systems and establish the caliphate. The injunction comes from the Quran 3:28. Muslims are asked not to accept the unbelievers as awlyia (guardians, rulers), but rather guard themselves from them. In another verse, 4:141 Muhammad said, “Allah will not allow the disbelievers to have an authority over the believers.” Muslims oath of allegiance to the non-Muslim countries is bogus. It is another deception. Don’t believe my words. Lo and behold with your own senses.
Any country ruled by any law other than the Sharia is dar al kufr (the land of disbelief) and consequently eligible to be designated as dar al harb, (the land of war). It does not matter whether the majority of its citizens are Muslims or not and whether the rulers are Muslims or not. The laws of the land must be Sharia law. Only a country ruled strictly by the Sharia law is dar al Islam (the land of Islam) and should remain amn (safe) from Muslims’ raids. No country is strictly ruled by the Sharia law today, not even Saudi Arabia or Iran. The Afghanistan under the Taliban was the only ideal model.
Dar al kufr does not automatically become dar al harb. The rulers must be given the option to submit to Muslims or pay the protection fee. In that case it will be classified as dar al adl (land of justice). But if they refuse to submit to Muslims and pay the jizya, the land becomes dar al harb and it is incumbent on every Muslim to wage war against it in every way possible within his power and topple that regime.
Here you can see what really Muslims mean by justice. According to Islam, justice is done only when the non-Muslims are subjugated and all the lands are restored to Allah and his chosen ones, the true Muslims. Justice in Islam does not mean equality of all men, but the supremacy of Allah and those who believe in him over the non believers. This is the divine justice, not the kind of justice that you and I understand.
The problem is that the non-Muslims do not know this. They do not know that they are under attack or when Muslims use words like justice, peace, tolerance what they mean. They are blinded by political correctness and rendered unconscious by multiculturalism. They will wake up from this coma when it is too late. In some European countries, like in UK and France, it may already be too late. Maybe it is their karma.
ITF: Shariah law is contradictory to our Democratic governments, and from what we know, the majority of Muslim women do not want the introduction of Shariah law within Canada and the US. Are these the major stumbling blocks that are currently preventing Muslims from implementing Shariah Law here?
Sina: Yes that is very much true. Muslim women know that under Sharia law they will lose their rights as humans. The truth is that most Muslims do not want to live under Sharia. They are caught in a tug of war, a cognitive dissonance, between their faith and how they really want to live. However, these people can be easily manipulated by the extremists and turn fully fledged Islamists and even terrorists. Faith is a dangerous thing. It makes you do things against your own conscience and interest. If you want to stop the Sharia law in the west you have to attack Islam and make Muslims realize that it is a lie.
ITF: Will the US court system provide, in any way, an entrance to implementation of Shariah Law?
Sina: The Sharia is unconstitutional. So how the courts could recognize it?? This is something that unscrupulous politicians may do. It is much easier to manipulate corrupt politicians with the promise of massive Muslim votes than bribe a judge. A party that thinks the Constitution is only a piece of paper and has put in office a president who is constitutionally ineligible, is likely to approve the Sharia law as well.? Right now America has a very corrupt government that is paving the road for the Islamization of this country.
ITF: It seems if there is going to be any change with Islam, it will be with the Muslim women. At least that is what we have seen in the past few years. Do you think Muslim women would reject Islam if they were allowed the freedom to do so?
Sina: Yes I agree that the real change will be made by Muslim women. This is quite obvious by watching the videos coming out of Iran. Women are at the forefront of the demonstrations. They have nothing to lose and are ready to give their lives for their freedom.? In the west you see courageous women, like Nonie Darish, Wafa Sultan and Ayan Hisi Ali who are at the line of fire in our battle against Islmization of the west.
?In Egypt there is this amazing woman, Nagla Al-Imam, (pictured here)?a graduate from Al Azhar University and an expert in the Sharia law who has openly converted to Christianity and has said she will not leave her country. http://www.faithfreedom.org/2009/08/25/if-you-convert-you-die/? Now, this is courage. May her God keep her save in that land filled with wolves! This shows that you cannot keep a woman enslaved after she is educated. The Taliban know that too. That is why they destroy the girl’s schools and kill their teachers.
ITF: Just about every conscious human in the free world knows about Islamic suicide bombers, train bombers, and night club bombers. Everyone knows that Muslims flying large commercial planes crashed into the World Trade Center buildings and the Pentagon on 9/11. Those are the actions of the obvious terrorist side of Islam. Yet, all the world hears is the plea from Muslims to understand that Islam is a religion of peace and love. If that is so, does this mean that Islamists who are terrorists use a Quran that is different from the "peaceful" Muslim's Quran?
Sina:
Yes that is true. There are two different Qurans. One is written and the other is imagined. The terrorists and the hate spewing mullahs read the written Quran. There are two dozens of sanitized versions of this Quran translated into English and despite the efforts of the translators, it still sounds gory. The other Quran exists in the imagination of the masses of Muslims who have never read the written Quran and attribute everything good that they can think of to it.
It is my belief that once these Muslims learn what is in the written Quran, their faith will be shattered and they will leave Islam. This may take some time. The believer often goes through a period of denial, then through the stages of shock, guilt, confusion, depression and anger until they reach the citadel of enlightenment and enter therein as apostates.
ITF:
ITF: Will it not offend their sensitivity?
Sina: To hell with their sensitivity! Tell the truth and save their lives.
ITF: Canada and America both have seen a rise in domestic terror cells. Jamat ul-Fuqra, Hizb-ut-Tahrir, just to name two! They operate openly and with peaceful identities. What are they in reality and why are the governments reluctant to approach them?
Sina: All Muslim groups are terrorists. This does not mean every Muslim is a terrorist. But if someone launches an Islamic group to advance Islam, under any pretext, whether peaceful of not, be careful of his intentions. Muslims fight for the same cause – the domination of Islam and the overthrow of all non Muslim governments. Their modus operandi is different. Some opt direct fighting and others covert fighting.
Last February, a Pakistani American who started a Muslim TV channel in the US to counter negative portrayal of Islam after the 9/11 terror attacks, beheaded his estranged wife in a very Islamic fashion. This man was clean shaven who wore suit and tie and was looking quite westernized and modernized.
A Muslim is a Muslim is a Muslim. Don’t let them confuse you with charades like “Islam is not a monolithic religion,” or “honor killing is cultural,” and other nonsense. A peaceful Muslim is a contradiction in terms. It is an oxymoron. Have you seen a hot ice? There is less chance to find a peaceful Muslim. The very fact that they keep reminding us that Islam is a religion of peace is because it is not. Why the followers of other religions don’t feel such an urge to constantly tell others their religion means peace? The proof of perfume is in its smell, not because it’s written on its label.
Now, don’t get me wrong. I am not saying all Muslims are violent and terrorists. There are many good people who call themselves Muslims. They are the majority. But they are good to the extent that they diverge from Islam. These same good people can turn dangerous when they remember they are Muslims.
Jihad stands on two feet. One is terror and the other is deception or taqiyyah. Both are essential for the advancement of Islam. Which foot you put forward depends on the situation. When Muslims are weak, taqiyyah is the best approach and when they are strong, ro’b (terror) is prescribed. This is sunnah, the example set by Muhammad. He used both terror and deception to advance his cause. Muhammad said war is deception and al nasro fil ro’b (victory is in terror). He bragged, “I have been made victorious with terror”
There is a debate going on among Muslims about whether Islam is strong enough to engage in warfare or not enough strong and therefore Muslims should work their way through deception. Of course, debates in Islam are always bloody, but nonetheless we have to recognize that this is a genuine debate, a la Musulman.
A few years ago, Dr. Mahathir who was the prime minister of Malaysia hosted the summit of Organization of Islamic Conference, where leaders of all 57 Islamic countries attended. In his speech, addressing all Muslims, he lamented that Islam has been associated with terrorism. He spoke of the past glory of Islam and after complaining that Muslims are now oppressed and humiliated. He encouraged them to put aside the fight, advance in science and technology and acquire wealth. And then do what? Build hospitals? Found Universities? Advance human civilization?? Improve Muslims’ life? Nope! Then he suggested that uslims should buy guns and rockets, bombs and warplanes, tanks and warships, destroy their enemies, subdue other nations, and make them kneel again in front of Muslims, as they did during Islam’s golden age.?
Dr. Mahathir was hailed as a moderate Muslim and by all accounts he is. So what is the difference between a moderate Muslim and a terrorist Muslim? The difference is that the latter thinks Muslims are strong enough and the time for Jihad has come while the former believes Muslims are still too weak for that. In essence, Muslims cannot disagree with the concept of Jihad because they would be disagreeing with the Quran. Jihad is a fundamental principle of Islam.
Jamat ul-Fuqra and Hizb-ut-Tahrir have the same goal that al Qaida has: Domination of Islam. The difference is in how they want to achieve this goal. One group wants to use terror now and the other prefers deception for now until Muslims are more powerful.
ITF: Lets talk a bit about Shariah Law. Why do some Western countries allow Sharia Law to be implemented instead of telling Muslims they must live according to the laws already in place? I’m speaking of the case in point in the UK.
Sina: Corruption my dear! Corruption of your politicians!? Politicians want the votes of Muslims and they will sell their mother for it. A good example is the new scandal surrounding the release of the Lockerbie bomber, Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi that involves the UK Prime Minister Brown.
The government of Britain made a mockery of justice and the memory of 300 people perished in that bombing when they released the terrorist Megrahi, to make a lucrative deal with?Libya.? This may surprise the British, but it does not surprise me. I am an Iranian. The British governments, have always looked the other way and sacrificed the human rights in Iran to make lucrative deals with the dictators of that county, and turned against them when those deals went elsewhere. In 1953 the British conspired to oust the democratic prime minister of Iran, Dr. Mossadeq, and reinstated the inexperienced and easily controllable Mohammad Reza Shah. Twenty six years later they turned against him and backed Khomeini and the tyrannical mullahs, when the Shah matured and tried to demonstrate his independence. Then for thirty years they supported one of the most brutal regimes in the world, knowing everything about the tortures, rapes in prisons, executions and all human rights abuses that their thuggish business partners were committing in?Iran. None of that mattered to the consecutive British governments. As long as the lucrative deals were coming, they turned a blind eye to all human rights abuses. But now that Russia and China have managed to win the mullahs to their side and the Brits are left in the cold, the British government is against the Islamic regime.
Shameless politicians will sell their wife, daughter and mother, not just their humanity and their country, in order to stay in power. Muslims take full advantage of that to strengthen their foothold in western countries. You will be defeated because your politicians are traitors.? It is time for a new generation of politicians to rise – politicians who put their country first, defend its laws, its constitution, its democratic values and its heritage. But this new breed of politicians will only rise when people support them. This consciousness must arise from the grassroots. For decades the western mind has been contaminated with leftist propaganda and now we are seeing the result. Islamism is expanding and the western civilization is disintegrating.
There is one man in Europe who has stood for Europe. He is Geert Wilder. Behold how the European leftist media vilifies him and equates him to Hitler. Remember how the unforgettable Oriana Fallaci, who stood for the west and its Judeo-Christian heritage, was treated by the courts in her own country, Italy.
You have a disease within your countries. It is called liberalism. It produces a toxin known as political correctness, and a venom called multiculturalism that poison your entire society. This disease affects your immune system and makes you vulnerable to your external and internal enemies. It has infected all democratic countries, from India to Europe and now it has spread to the US, affecting its very heart.
If you want to defend your country from Islamization, you have to flush out your system from liberalism. You need to take the power away from those who are selling out your country and vote for patriotic servants of the people who are not afraid to call a spade a spade and do not fear to stand up against Muslims and their effort to Islamize your country.
The Sharia must be outlawed not just because it is anti constitutional, but also anti American and anti human. The Sharia is an insult to humanity - an assault to women. Every bit of it is a violation of human rights.
Construction of mosques must be banned. Mosques are places where Muslims are indoctrinated to hate their fellow non-Muslim citizens. Banning the construction of mosques is in conformity with Islam. Muslims do not allow building Hindu temples, churches or any other non Muslim house of worship in their Islamic countries.
Why should we allow a religion to grow in our midst when we know that if they come to power they will take our freedom away from us?
Then you have to start a campaign to inform people about Islam and to rescue those trapped in this gigantic web of deception. I am not saying that governments should do this, but they should not stand in the way of those who want to use their right to free speech and threaten them with penalties.
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/36272-protesters-threaten-bloodshed-over-hindu-temple
Once Muslims leave Islam they can be as trustworthy and patriotic as anyone else. As long as they are Muslims you have to watch their every move with suspicion. Muslims’ loyalty is not to their country, but to Islam. They have a duty to destroy the non-Muslim systems and establish the caliphate. The injunction comes from the Quran 3:28. Muslims are asked not to accept the unbelievers as awlyia (guardians, rulers), but rather guard themselves from them. In another verse, 4:141 Muhammad said, “Allah will not allow the disbelievers to have an authority over the believers.” Muslims oath of allegiance to the non-Muslim countries is bogus. It is another deception. Don’t believe my words. Lo and behold with your own senses.
Any country ruled by any law other than the Sharia is dar al kufr (the land of disbelief) and consequently eligible to be designated as dar al harb, (the land of war). It does not matter whether the majority of its citizens are Muslims or not and whether the rulers are Muslims or not. The laws of the land must be Sharia law. Only a country ruled strictly by the Sharia law is dar al Islam (the land of Islam) and should remain amn (safe) from Muslims’ raids. No country is strictly ruled by the Sharia law today, not even Saudi Arabia or Iran. The Afghanistan under the Taliban was the only ideal model.
Dar al kufr does not automatically become dar al harb. The rulers must be given the option to submit to Muslims or pay the protection fee. In that case it will be classified as dar al adl (land of justice). But if they refuse to submit to Muslims and pay the jizya, the land becomes dar al harb and it is incumbent on every Muslim to wage war against it in every way possible within his power and topple that regime.
Here you can see what really Muslims mean by justice. According to Islam, justice is done only when the non-Muslims are subjugated and all the lands are restored to Allah and his chosen ones, the true Muslims. Justice in Islam does not mean equality of all men, but the supremacy of Allah and those who believe in him over the non believers. This is the divine justice, not the kind of justice that you and I understand.
The problem is that the non-Muslims do not know this. They do not know that they are under attack or when Muslims use words like justice, peace, tolerance what they mean. They are blinded by political correctness and rendered unconscious by multiculturalism. They will wake up from this coma when it is too late. In some European countries, like in UK and France, it may already be too late. Maybe it is their karma.
ITF: Shariah law is contradictory to our Democratic governments, and from what we know, the majority of Muslim women do not want the introduction of Shariah law within Canada and the US. Are these the major stumbling blocks that are currently preventing Muslims from implementing Shariah Law here?
Sina: Yes that is very much true. Muslim women know that under Sharia law they will lose their rights as humans. The truth is that most Muslims do not want to live under Sharia. They are caught in a tug of war, a cognitive dissonance, between their faith and how they really want to live. However, these people can be easily manipulated by the extremists and turn fully fledged Islamists and even terrorists. Faith is a dangerous thing. It makes you do things against your own conscience and interest. If you want to stop the Sharia law in the west you have to attack Islam and make Muslims realize that it is a lie.
ITF: Will the US court system provide, in any way, an entrance to implementation of Shariah Law?
Sina: The Sharia is unconstitutional. So how the courts could recognize it?? This is something that unscrupulous politicians may do. It is much easier to manipulate corrupt politicians with the promise of massive Muslim votes than bribe a judge. A party that thinks the Constitution is only a piece of paper and has put in office a president who is constitutionally ineligible, is likely to approve the Sharia law as well.? Right now America has a very corrupt government that is paving the road for the Islamization of this country.
ITF: It seems if there is going to be any change with Islam, it will be with the Muslim women. At least that is what we have seen in the past few years. Do you think Muslim women would reject Islam if they were allowed the freedom to do so?
Sina: Yes I agree that the real change will be made by Muslim women. This is quite obvious by watching the videos coming out of Iran. Women are at the forefront of the demonstrations. They have nothing to lose and are ready to give their lives for their freedom.? In the west you see courageous women, like Nonie Darish, Wafa Sultan and Ayan Hisi Ali who are at the line of fire in our battle against Islmization of the west.
?In Egypt there is this amazing woman, Nagla Al-Imam, (pictured here)?a graduate from Al Azhar University and an expert in the Sharia law who has openly converted to Christianity and has said she will not leave her country. http://www.faithfreedom.org/2009/08/25/if-you-convert-you-die/? Now, this is courage. May her God keep her save in that land filled with wolves! This shows that you cannot keep a woman enslaved after she is educated. The Taliban know that too. That is why they destroy the girl’s schools and kill their teachers.
ITF: Just about every conscious human in the free world knows about Islamic suicide bombers, train bombers, and night club bombers. Everyone knows that Muslims flying large commercial planes crashed into the World Trade Center buildings and the Pentagon on 9/11. Those are the actions of the obvious terrorist side of Islam. Yet, all the world hears is the plea from Muslims to understand that Islam is a religion of peace and love. If that is so, does this mean that Islamists who are terrorists use a Quran that is different from the "peaceful" Muslim's Quran?
Sina:
Yes that is true. There are two different Qurans. One is written and the other is imagined. The terrorists and the hate spewing mullahs read the written Quran. There are two dozens of sanitized versions of this Quran translated into English and despite the efforts of the translators, it still sounds gory. The other Quran exists in the imagination of the masses of Muslims who have never read the written Quran and attribute everything good that they can think of to it.
It is my belief that once these Muslims learn what is in the written Quran, their faith will be shattered and they will leave Islam. This may take some time. The believer often goes through a period of denial, then through the stages of shock, guilt, confusion, depression and anger until they reach the citadel of enlightenment and enter therein as apostates.
ITF:
Do you think it's possible to modernize Islam
so that it can become compatible with the modern world?
Sina:
No. There can be no change in Islam. Any honest
Muslim will tell you that. That is what Muhammad has warned against in many
parts of the Quran. (Quran .2:85) Do you, then, believe in some parts of the divine writ and deny the truth of other parts? What, then, could be the reward of those among you who do such things but ignominy in the life of this world? And, on the Day of Resurrection, they will be consigned to most grievous suffering. For God is not unmindful of what you do.
(Quran 6:114) Am I, then, to look unto anyone but God for judgment [as to what is right and wrong], when it is He who has bestowed upon you from on high this divine writ, clearly spelling out the truth?
For more discussion on why Islam cannot be reformed read my article, The Illusion of Reforming Islam.
There are individuals in the west that claim to be moderate Muslims and even against the Sharia. People must not fall for this charade. Sharia is Islam. You cannot be a Muslim and be against the Sharia. It is like saying I am a Christian but against the Bible. By seeing these self proclaimed moderate Muslims, I can understand the anger that Jesus felt against those hypocrites whom he called addressed, because you are lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of my mouth.
Muhammad was a thief, a pedophile a mass murderer, a rapist, a sadist torturer, and a conman charlatan. You either believe in him or you don’t. It is hypocritical to say, I am a follower of Muhammad, but not wicked enough to emulate him, and in fact I am such a nice person that I oppose him.
I can understand the self proclaimed moderate Muslims in Islamic countries and I have utmost respect for them. This is the only way they can remain alive. But those in the west pull wool over the eyes of the unwary non-Muslims, making them believe Islam has a moderate side too, which is not true.
Many Muslims know nothing about Islam. They are moderate and good citizens. They can be excused. But those who appear in televisions and radios, give interviews and write articles, are not ignorant. So what is their agenda? I don’t know. I just don’t like deception. Truth must be said. And the truth is that Islam is evil and Muhammad was a cult leader.
When Nazis ruled over? Germany, many Germans were supporting them. Not all those Germans were evil. Most of them were ignorant. They did not know the truth about Nazis and Hitler. So you can forgive them. The same can be said about millions of Americans who voted for and still support Obama. They don’t know him. But what would you say of a person who knows the truth about Hitler, disagrees with him and calls himself “a moderate Nazi?” Likewise, there is something fishy, something does not add up with the claim of the self proclaimed moderate Muslims.
There is no such thing as moderate or peaceful Islam. Muslims are of two kinds. They are either terrorist Muslims or ignorant Muslims. The ignorant Muslims are, thanks heaven, the majority. Once they learn the truth about the real Islam they will leave it.
The cure for ignorance is knowledge. What is the cure for hypocrisy?
We want Muslims to leave Islam. We don’t want them to modernize it or reform it. That is not possible and we would be fooling ourselves into complacency, lowering our guards and making ourselves vulnerable to Islamic take over through deception. You should never trust a rattle snake as a pet. Likewise, Islam should not be trusted. It cannot change and those who try to make you think otherwise are either delusional and cannot cut their umbilical cord from Islam, or have an agenda.
ITF: Do you think radical Islam will proliferate under the new Obama administration?
Sina: Radical Islam and Islam are the same. Islam is radical.
The answer to your question is yes. Obama is pulling wool over the eyes of Americans by acting as an apologist for Islam. In his latest message for Ramazan, he said, “These rituals remind us of the principles that we hold in common, and Islam’s role in advancing justice, progress, tolerance, and the dignity of all human beings.”
This is a pack of lies. Islamic justice is injustice to non-believers, as we saw earlier.
Islam has never been for progress. All the knowledge is deemed to exist in the Quran and everything that is not in the Quran is either taghooti (ungodly/satanic), or redundant. If Islam is for progress, why the Islamic countries are so backward?? Shouldn’t they be at least a little more advanced than kafir countries that do not practice Islam at all?
Tolerance in Islam has to be purchased with jizya. You have to pay a protection fee to Muslims so they leave you alone. This is no different from the kind of tolerance the Mafia had towards businesses inChicago, during their heyday.
Also if you are not a Muslim, Islam does not recognize your dignity or even rights as a human being. If you are a Muslim, that is even worse because you will be killed if you choose to exercise your freedom of belief which is the basis of human dignity.
What is shocking is that Obama administration has actually endorsed Jihad. Here are Obama’s counter-terrorism advisor John Brennan's words:
"Nor does President Obama see this challenge as a fight against `jihadists.'?Describing terrorists in this way--using a legitimate term, `jihad,' meaning to purify oneself or to wage a holy struggle for a moral goal--risks giving?these murderers the religious legitimacy they desperately seek but in no way?deserve.”
It is not only unconscionable for aUS government to define a religious concept and act as an apologist for it, it is shameful to lie and deceive the public. Now this administration is saying that jihad is legitimate and recognizes its goal as moral? The goal of jihad is to conquer the word with raids/terrorism. The 9/11 was jihad. Is this a moral goal?
Jihad has never stood for self purification. This lie was probably propagated by the Sufis who like today’s reformers, foolishly tried to make Islam a bit more peaceful. They claimed that after Muhammad returned from his last raid on Tabuk, he told his followers ‘We have returned from Jihad Asghar to Jihad Akbar’ which means self purification.
Ibn Taimiyyah (1263 – 1328) one of the greatest Muslim scholars of all times clarified: “There is a Hadith related by a group of people which states that the Prophet (s.a.w) said after the battle of Tabuk: ‘We have returned from Jihad Asghar to Jihad Akbar’. This hadith has no source, nobody whomsoever in the field of Islamic knowledge has narrated it. Jihad against the disbelievers is the most noble of actions, and moreover it is the most important action for the sake of mankind.” [Refer: Al Furqan baina Auliyair Rahman wa Auliyaisy Shaitaan, matter 44-45].?
Another hadith narrates: A man asked the prophet: “..and what is Jihad?” He replied: “You fight against the disbelievers when you meet them.” He asked again: “What kind of Jihad is the highest?” He replied: “The person who is killed whilst spilling the last of his blood.” [Narrated by Ahmad in his Musnad 4/114 - Hadith sahih. Al Haithami states: “Narrators upheld it.” Majmauz Zawaid 1/59].
More on this subject here:
Apart from deceiving the Americans, Obama is doing everything to weaken the defense of America against its enemies, such as closing the?Guantanamo?Bay and prosecuting the CIA agents for waterboarding the terrorists to extract information that saved American lives.The terrorists will not attack now. Instead they will build their cells and will do incalculable damage at a later date.?
Obama’s destruction of the economy will be catastrophic, but the harm that he is doing to the homeland security is equally calamitous.
Americans are seeing the danger that this snake oil salesman is posing to their country. They are participating in tea party rallies, attending town hall meetings and are taking their country back. They are waking up (although not soon enough). Obama has been a catastrophe for?America, but Americans are patriotic and they will not let this Marxist, Saul Alinsky and Bill Ayer disciple community organizer, take their country to dogs.
ITF: We want to wish you the best with your book, Understanding Muhammad. Do you feel that if people understood what kind of person Muhammad really was, that they would have a better understanding of Islam
http://www.faithfreedom.org/2009/05/24/understanding-muhammad/
Sina: Absolutely! To understand Islam and hence Muslims, it is imperative to understand Muhammad. Islam is Muhammadanism. Muslims follow and emulate their prophet. Once you know Muhammad and his psychology, you’ll find Muslims are very predictable. As a matter of fact the key to destroy Islam is to understand Muhammad.
My book is unique in the sense that it probes into the mind of Muhammad and unravels his psychological makeup. There are thousands of short stories about Muhammad narrated by his wives and companions. Collectively, they reveal a very clear picture of him. Unlike Jesus, Moses and other religious figures of the past, whose lives are shrouded in myths and legends, Muhammad’s life-story is recorded in detail. I analyzed him under the light of the modern psychology and I have shown that he suffered from a series of disorders and that the entire phenomenon known as Islam is a mental case. Once you read the book, you’ll realize that Islam is an overgrown cult, no different from that of Jim Jones, David Koresh or Charles Manson. The difference is that Muhammad came in a time and place where there was no central power and no one to stop him.
There are many books that show the evilness of Islam. All you have to do is read the Quran, the hadith and the sira, the biography of Muhammad, and you will see that Islam is very evil. But the question remains: How could something so evil becomes the second largest religion in the world and how could a man so depraved influence so many? Something is amiss. If Islam is so bad why can’t a billion people see it? Are we to suppose that there are no intelligent people among a billion Muslims? How could so many people, for so many generations, fail to see the obvious
This is an important question, which weighs on Muslims, validates their faith and prevents them from questioning it. You have to explain this phenomenon if you want to wean them from Islam.
There is a mystery surrounding Muhammad. It is thanks to this mystery that Islam has survived so long. Understanding Muhammad demystifies him. Once Muhammad is demystified and the nakedness of the emperor becomes widely known, no one will believe in him. When the mystic is gone Islam will be gone.
All the Muslims who have read my book have left Islam. Those who did not leave did not read the book. How do I know that? They tell me. They write to say they read 10, 20 or 30 pages and the book is full of garbage and that they are not going to waste their time reading it. The book is not garbage, but they are afraid to read it because they see the effect that it has on them and they are terrified at the thought of doubting Islam. The fear of hell has paralyzed the Muslims’ mind.
I am confident that the spread of truth about will end Islam. Understanding Muhammad is being translated in a few other languages. It will be available for free download in the languages spoken by Muslims. Many Muslims will leave Islam after reading it and their exodus will start an avalanche which will precipitate the complete fall of Islam.
ITF: On behalf of the Infidel Task Force, I wish to thank you for taking the time to chat with us and giving us your point of view on Shariah Law, Radical Islam and what to do about the ongoing threat.
Thank You very Much.
Sina: Thank you. It was my pleasure
Source: http://infideltaskforce.webs.com/itfinterviews.htm?
No comments:
Post a Comment