Wednesday, 28 October 2026

The Prophet of Terror and Mayhem Pt. 1

THE QURAN

We shall cast terror (al-rruAAba) into the hearts of those who disbelieve, BECAUSE they joined others in worship with Allah, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zalimun (polytheists and wrongdoers). And Allah did indeed fulfil His Promise to you when you were killing them (your enemy) with His Permission; until (the moment) you lost your courage and fell to disputing about the order, and disobeyed after He showed you (of the booty) which you love. Among you are some that desire this world and some that desire the Hereafter. Then He made you flee from them (your enemy), that He might test you. But surely, He forgave you, and Allah is Most Gracious to the believers. S. 3:151-152 Hilali-Khan

In this article I am going to show that Muhammad was a terrorist who was sent by his god to terrorize and slay all unbelievers unless and until they submitted to his demands and desires.

This passage is explicitly clear. The reason why Allah sent Muhammad to terrorize the unbelievers is not because they attacked Muslims or threatened to kill them. Rather, the disbelievers were being terrorized and murdered solely because they worshiped other beings along with or besides Allah.

(Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror (al-rruAAba) into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.” S. 8:12 Hilali-Khan

Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror (turhiboona) into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly. S. 8:60 A. Yusuf Ali

And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allah brought them down from their forts and cast terror (al-rruAAba) into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives. S. 33:26 Hilali-Khan

Here is how one lexical source defines these specific Arabic words:

Ra-Ayn-Ba = fear/terror, frighten, tremble with fear, great awe, threatened, loud and vehement sound, rhyming prose, charmed/fascinated, fill (e.g. vessel, valley), cut into pieces or slices, weak and cowardly, shaking/quivering.

ra’aba vb. (1) n.vb. 3:151, 8:12, 18:18, 33:26, 59:2…

Ra-ha-Ba = to fear/dread/terrify, terror, awe, frightened, to become fatigued/tired/weary or jaded… (Project Root List http://www.studyquran.co.uk/17_RA.htm)

THE AHADITH

The narrations attributed to Muhammad further confirm that Allah’s “messenger” was sent to tyrannize the disbelievers until they came under his control. Note what Muhammad is reported to have said:

328. It is related that Jabir ibn ‘Abdullah said, “The Prophet said, ‘I have been given five things which no one before me was given: I have been helped to victory by terror flooding (my enemies’) hearts up to a month’s journey away; for me, the whole earth has been made a mosque and made pure (for purification by tayammum) – wherever a man of my community finds himself when the time of prayer comes, he can pray; taking booty has been made lawful for me when it was not lawful for anyone before me; I have been given the right of intercession; and whereas every other Prophet was sent only to his people, I have been sent to all mankind.'” (Aisha Bewley, The Sahih Collection of al-Bukhari, Chapter 7. Book of Tayammum https://bewley.virtualave.net/bukhari4.html#7; bold and underline emphasis ours)

XXIII: The saying of the Prophet, “For me, the whole earth has been made a mosque and made pure.”

427. It is related that Jabir ibn ‘Abdullah said, “The Prophet said, ‘I have been given five things which none of the Prophets before me was given: I have been helped to victory by terror flooding (my enemies’) hearts up to a month’s journey away; for me, the whole earth has been made a mosque and made pure (for purification bytayammum) – wherever a man of my community finds himself when the time of prayer comes, he can pray; taking booty has been made lawful for me when it was not lawful for anyone before me; I have been sent to all mankind; and I have been granted intercession.'” (Bewley, Chapter 8. Book of Prayer https://bewley.virtualave.net/bukhari5.html#8; underline emphasis ours)

CXX: The words of the Prophet, “I have been given help by means of terror over a month’s distance,” and His words, the Mighty and Exalted, “We will cast terror into the hearts of those who reject because of their attributing partners to Allah.” (3:151)

2815. It is related from Abu Hurayra that the Messenger of Allah said, “I have been sent with comprehensive words and have been helped WITH TERROR. While I was asleep, I was given the keys to the treasures of the earth and they were placed in my hand.” Abu Hurayra said, “The Messenger of Allah has departed and you are extracting them.” (Bewley, Chapter 61. Book of Jihad and Military Expeditions https://bewley.virtualave.net/bukhari23.html#jihad; capital and underline emphasis ours)

Here we have Muhammad basically acknowledging that he was sent as a murdering bandit to spread terror into the lives of unbelievers. He even admits to being the only “prophet” given permission to steal the lands and property of the disbelievers.

This brings me to my next point. Notice how Muhammad described his own mission according to some of the hadiths:

Narrated Anas bin Malik: Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.”

Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387 http://searchtruth.com/book_display.php?book=8&translator=1&start=0&number=386)

Sadly, Muhammad’s companions continued his campaign of murder and terror even after his demise:

Narrated Abu Huraira: When Allah’s Apostle died and Abu Bakr became the caliph some Arabs renegade (reverted to disbelief) (Abu Bakr decided to declare war against them), ‘Umar, said to Abu Bakr, “How can you fight with these people although Allah’s Apostle said, ‘I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight the people till they say: “None has the right to be worshipped but Allah, and whoever said it then he will save his life and property from me except on trespassing the law (rights and conditions for which he will be punished justly), and his accounts will be with Allah”?’ Abu Bakr said, “By Allah! I will fight those who differentiate between the prayer and the Zakat as Zakat is the compulsory right to be taken from the property (according to Allah’s orders) By Allah! If they refuse to pay me even a she-kid which they used to pay at the time of Allah’s Apostle. I would fight with them for withholding it.” Then ‘Umar said, “By Allah, it was nothing, but Allah opened Abu Bakr’s chest towards the decision (to fight) and I came to know that his decision was right.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 2, Book 23, number 483 http://searchtruth.com/book_display.php?book=23&translator=1&start=0&number=483)

Note again that the reason why Abu Bakr decided to fight the apostates wasn’t because they were threatening to kill the Muslims. Rather, the reason given was because they were no longer faithfully observing some of the pillars of Islam such as paying the Zakat.

In light of the foregoing, could the Quran and ahadith be any clearer that Muhammad was a terrorist sent to struck fear and horror into the hearts of people solely because they didn’t believe in Islam?

With that said we are ready to proceed to the next part https://answeringislamblog.wordpress.com/2016/12/28/the-prophet-of-terror-and-mayhem-pt-2/ where we address some of the objections raised by specific Muhammadans to deny the fact of Muhammad being a murdering bandit who went around terrorizing unbelievers for not embracing his view of God.

Source: https://answeringislamblog.wordpress.com/2016/12/27/the-prophet-of-terror-and-mayhem-pt-1/ 

IHS

The Prophet of Terror and Mayhem Pt. 2

 In this part https://answeringislamblog.wordpress.com/2016/12/27/the-prophet-of-terror-and-mayhem-pt-1/ I am going to address a couple of responses that Muslims raise to explain away the plain statements of the Quran and ahadith that Muhammad was a terrorist sent to murder and plunder all the unbelievers unless and until they submitted to his rule and wishes.

ONLY SENT TO WARN

Certain polemicists appeal to the following version of Muhammad’s saying to disprove the notion of their prophet being a tyrant sent to terrorize the disbelievers:

Jami` at-Tirmidhi

Chapters on Tafsir

Jabir narrated that: the Messenger of Allah said:

“I have been ordered to fight the people until they say: ‘La ilaha illallah’. So when they say that, their blood and their wealth are safe from me, except for a right, and their reckoning is for Allah.” Then he recited: So remind them – you are only one who reminds. You are not a dictator over them.

Grade: Hasan (Darussalam)

English reference: Vol. 5, Book 44, Hadith 3341

Arabic reference: Book 47, Hadith 3664 (Sunnah.com https://sunnah.com/urn/680520; underline emphasis ours)

(8) Chapter: The command to fight the people until they say “La ilaha illallah Muhammad Rasul-Allah“, and establish Salat, and pay the Zakat, and believe in everything that the prophet brought. Whoever does that, his life and his wealth are protected except by its right, and his secrets are entrusted to Allah, the most high. Fighting those who withhold Zakat or other than that is one of the duties of Islam and the Iman should be concerned with the Laws of Islam

It is narrated on the authority of Jabir that the Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded that I should fight against people till they declare that there is no god but Allah, and when they profess it that there is no god but Allah, their blood and riches are guaranteed protection on my behalf except where it is justified by law, and their affairs rest with Allah, and then he (the Holy Prophet) recited (this verse of the Holy Qur’an): ”Thou art not over them a warden” (lxxxviii, 22).” (Sahih Muslim, Book 1, Number 32 http://sunnah.com/muslim/1/35)

These polemicists assume that Muhammad’s appeal to Q. 88:22,

Thou art not impowered to act with authority over them. Sale

Confirms that he wasn’t sent to murder all those who refused to become Muslims.

Before we reply it is important that we quote some more of the immediate context so as to get a clearer picture of what is being said here:

So remind them (O Muhammad), you are only a one who reminds. You are not a dictator over them. Save the one who turns away and disbelieves Then Allah will punish him with the greatest punishment. Verily, to Us will be their return; Then verily, for Us will be their reckoning. S. 88:21-26 Hilali-Khan

In view of the immediate context, the passage is not saying that Muhammad has no authority to go around slaying the disbelievers. On the contrary, the point of the passage is that Muhammad doesn’t have the ability to make any one believe, and therefore cannot force the unbelievers to become Muslims, which is why he has been sent to fight them. I.e., since not everyone will come to “faith” Muhammad is left with no choice but to murder them since he is Allah’s agent of judgment sent to punish the unbelievers for refusing to submit to Allah and his “messenger”.

This is precisely what the Quran says elsewhere,

Fight them, Allah will punish them by your hands and bring them to disgrace, and assist you against them and heal the hearts of a believing people. S. 9:14 Hilali-Khan

And how some of the Muslim expositors understood the Quran’s message concerning the role Muhammad and his followers were to play in bringing about the punishment of Allah upon the disbelievers for their refusal to believe:

God will chastise him with the greater chastisement the chastisement of the Hereafter the lesser chastisement being that of this world that of being killed or taken captive. (Tafsir al-Jalalayn, Q. 88:24 http://altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=74&tSoraNo=88&tAyahNo=24&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2)

Other commentators believed that Q. 88:22 and similar verses had actually been abrogated by texts such as Q. 9:5 and 29, which commanded Muhammad to kill the pagan Arabs and the Jews and Christians, with the exception that the latter had the additional choice of remaining in their respective faiths provided they were willing to pay the jizyah:

you are not a taskmaster over them a variant reading for musaytir has musaytir that is to say not one who has been given authority over them — this was revealed before the command to struggle against the disbelievers. (Tafsir al-Jalalayn, Q. 88:22 http://altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=74&tSoraNo=88&tAyahNo=22&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2; bold emphasis ours)

(Thou art not) O Muhammad (at all a warder over them) you are not imposed on them such that you force them to accept faith. Later on, Allah commanded him to fight them, saying: (But whoso is averse and disbelieveth) except he who turns away from faith and disbelieves in Allah, (Tanwîr al-Miqbâs min Tafsîr Ibn ‘Abbâs, Q. 88:22-23 http://altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=73&tSoraNo=88&tAyahNo=22&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2; http://altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=73&tSoraNo=88&tAyahNo=23&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2; bold emphasis ours)

“Fight in the way of God with those who fight with you, but aggress not: God loves not the aggressors” (2:190). On the authority of Ja’far ar-Razi from Rabi’ Ibn ‘Ons, from ‘Abil-‘Aliyah who said: This is the first verse that was revealed in the Qur’an about fighting in the Madina. When it was revealed the prophet used to fight those who fight with him and avoid those who avoid him, until Sura 9 was revealed. And so is the opinion of ‘Abd ar-Rahman Ibn Zayd Ibn ‘Aslam who said this verse was cancelled by 9:5 “Slay the idolaters wherever you find them.” (Ibn Hazm al-Andalusi, An-Nasikh wal-Mansukh [Dar al-Kotob al-‘Elmeyah, Beirut, 1986], p. 27)

This is the Ayah of the Sword…

<But if they repent and perform the Salah, and give Zakah, then leave their way free. Verily, Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.>

Abu Bakr As-Siddiq used this and other honorable Ayat as proof for fighting those who refrained from paying the Zakah. These Ayat allowed fighting people unless, and until, they embrace Islam and implement its rulings and obligations… In the two Sahihs, it is recorded that Ibn ‘Umar said that the Messenger of Allah said…

<I have been commanded to fight the people until they testify there is no deity worthy of worship except Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, establish the prayer and pay Zakah.>

This honorable Ayah (9:5) was called the Ayah of the Sword, about which Ad-Dahhak bin Muzahim said, “IT ABROGATED EVERY AGREEMENT OF PEACE BETWEEN THE PROPHET AND ANY IDOLATOR, EVERY TREATY, AND EVERY TERM.“ Al-‘Awfi said that Ibn ‘Abbas commented: “No idolator had any more treaty or promise ever since Sura Bara’ah was revealed. The four months, in addition to, all peace treaties conducted before Bara’ah was revealed and announced had ended by the tenth of the month of Rabi’ Al-Akhir.” (Tafsir Ibn Kathir (Abridged), Surat Al-A’raf to the end of Surah Yunus, abridged by a group of scholars under the supervision of Shaykh Safiur-Rahman Al-Mubarakpuri [Darussalam Publishers & Distributors, Riyadh, Houston, New York, Lahore; First Edition: May 2000] Volume 4, pp. 375, 377 http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2581&Itemid=64; capital and underline emphasis ours)

The following quotes are taken from these two pages: 1 http://bewley.virtualave.net/tawba1.html, 2 http://bewley.virtualave.net/tawba2.html.

Ibn Juzayy:

(Then when the sacred months are over) i.e. the four months designated for them. Those who say that they are Shawwal, Dhu’l-Qa’da, Dhu’l-Hijja and al-Muharram, says that they are the well-known Sacred Months – with the addition of Shawwal and omission of Rajab. They are called “sacred” because the majority dominates in an Arabic phrase. Those who say that they last until Rab’ ath-Thani calls them sacred because of their inviolability and because fighting in them was forbidden.

(kill the mushrikun wherever you find them) ABROGATING EVERY PEACE TREATY IN THE QUR’AN. It is said that it abrogates, “by setting them free or ransom.” (47:4) It is also said that it is abrogated by it and so setting them free and ransom are permitted. (seize them) means to capture, and the one taken is the captive.

(If they make tawba) after disbelief. Then He connects belief to the prayer and zakat. That is an indication that one should fight anyone WHO ABANDONS THE PRAYER AND ZAKAT as Abu Bakr as-Siddiq did. The ayat encompassed the meaning of the Prophet’s words, “I am commanded to fight people until they say, ‘There is no god but Allah and establish the prayer and pay the zakat.” (let them go on their way) granting them security…

(Fight those of the people who do not have iman in Allah and the Last Day) A command to fight the People of the Book and denying their belief in Allah because of the words of the Jews, “‘Uzayr is the son of Allah” and the words of the Christians, “The Messiah is the son of Allah.” Their belief in the Last Day is denied because their belief in it is incorrect. They do not accept the Next World or the Reckoning.

(who do not make haram what Allah and His Messenger have made haram) because they consider as lawful carrion, blood, pork, etc. (and do not take as their deen the deen of Truth) i.e. THEY DO NOT ENTER ISLAM.

(who were given the Book) Clarifying those they were commanded to fight. When this ayat was revealed, the Messenger of Allah set out on the expedition to Tabuk to fight the Christians.

(until they pay the jizya) Scholars agree about accepting jizya from the Jews and Christians. The Magians/Zoroasterians have been added to them going by the words of the Prophet, “Treat them as People of the Book.” There is disagreement about accepting it from idolaters and Sabians. It is not collected from women, children or the insane. Malik says that it is 4 dinars for the people who use gold and 40 dirhams for the people who use silver. It is a head tax. (with their own hands) This has two interpretations. One is that the dhimmi pays it with his own hand and does not send anyone with it nor postpone it as is said, “from hand to hand.” The second is submission and obedience as you say, “he gave his hand to so-and-so [an _expression meaning “he surrendered to so-and-so”].” (STATE OF ABASEMENT) i.e. they are humble.

as-Suyuti

This [Q. 9:5] is an Ayat of the Sword WHICH ABROGATES PARDON, TRUCE AND OVERLOOKING. (seize them) is used as evidence for the permission to take captives. (and besiege them) is permission for besieging and raiding and attacking by night. Ibn Abi Hatim reported that Abu ‘Imran al-Jawfi said that ribat in the way of Allah is found in the words, “lie in wait for them on every road.” (if they make tawba and establish the prayer and pay the zakat, let them go on their way) Repentance from shirk is not enough to let them go their way until they establish the prayer and pay the zakat. Ash-Shafi’i took this as a proof FOR KILLING ANYONE WHO ABANDONS THE PRAYER and fighting ANYONE WHO REFUSES TO PAY ZAKAT. Some use it as a proof that they are kafirun…

(Fight those of the people who do not have iman in Allah and the Last Day) This is the basis for accepting jizya from the People of the Book, and it is a refutation of those who accept it from others. “With their own hands”. It is related by Abu Hatim from Qatada to be BY FORCE, and by Abu Sufyan to be by ability. Its literal meaning is that it is not taken from someone in a state of hardship as Ibn al-Majishun stated. Ibn ‘Uyayna said that “with their own hands” means that it is not sent with someone else. This is used as evidence by those who say that a Muslim cannot be delegated to do it, nor can he guarantee it for him nor transfer it from him to himself, but the dhimmi must pay it in person.

(state of abasement) Ibn ‘Abbas said: they are pushed. Ibn Abi Hatim transmitted that. It is transmitted that al-Mughira told Rustam, “I call you to Islam or else you must pay the jizya while you are in a state of abasement.” He said, “I know what jizya means, but what does ‘a state of abasement’ mean?” He replied, “You pay it while you are standing and I am sitting AND THE WHIP IS HANGING OVER YOUR HEAD.” Abu’sh-Shaykh related that Sa’id ibn al-Musayyab said, “I prefer that the people of thedhimma become tired by paying the jizya since He says, ‘until they pay the jizya with their own hands in a state of complete abasement.'” It is used as a proof by those who say THAT IT IS TAKEN IN A HUMILIATING WAY, and so the taker sits and the dhimmi stands with his head bowed and his back bent. The jizya is placed in the balance and the taker seizes his beard and hits his chin. This is rejected according to an-Nawawi who said, “This manner is invalid.” This ayat is used as a proof by those who say that the people of the dhimma are left in the land of Islam because it is understood that one refrains from fighting them when they pay it. (Capital and underline emphasis ours)

The following is taken from the Encyclopaedia of the Quran, Volume 3. J-Q, starting from p. 40. Paragraph breaks have been inserted to facilitate easier reading. All bold and capitalized emphasis within the bolded parts will be ours:

… There are also Quranic references to treaties with infidels and to peace (Q 2:208; 4:90; 8:61; cf. Q 3:28; 47:35; see CONTRACTS AND ALLIANCES). All these are in conflict with the clear order to fight the idolaters (mushrikun), until they are converted to Islam and is known as “the sword verse” (ayat al-sayf, SEE POLYTHEISM AND ATHEISM). Q 9:29 orders Muslims to fight the People of the Book (q.v.) until they consent to pay tribute (jizya, SEE POLL TAX), thereby recognizing the superiority of Islam. It is known as “the jizya verse” (ayat al-jizya, occasionally also as “the sword verse”). The Quran does not lay down rules for cases of Muslim defeat, although there is a long passage discussing such an occurrence (Q 3:139-75, SEE ALSO 4:104; SEE VICTORY).

A broad consensus among medieval exegetes and jurists exists on the issue of waging war. The simplest AND EARLIEST SOLUTION of the problem of contradictions in the Quran was to consider Q 9:5 and 9:29 as abrogating all the other statements. Scholars seem sometimes to have deliberately expanded the list of the abrogated verses, including in it material that is irrelevant to the issue of waging war (e.g. Q 2:83, see Ibn al-Barzi, Nasikh,23; Ibn al-Jawzi, Musaffa, 14; id., Nawasikh, 156-8; Baydawi, Anwar, i, 70; Tabari, Tafsir, i, 311; other examples: Q 3:111; 4:63; 16:126, 23:96; 25:63; 28:55; 38:88; 39:3). The number of verses abrogated by Q 9:5 and 9:29 is sometimes said TO EXCEED 120 (Ibn al-Barzi, Nasikh, 22-3 and passim; also Powers, Exegetical genre, 138). Several verses are considered as both abrogating and abrogated, in turn, by others. The Muslim tradition, followed by modern scholars (SEE POST-ENLIGHTENMENT ACADEMIC STUDY OF THE QURAN), associated various verses with developments in the career of the Prophet. It is related that, in the beginning, God instructed the prophet to avoid the infidels and to forgive them. The Prophet was actually forbidden to wage war while in Mecca (q.v.). After the emigration to Medina (hijra) the Muslims were first permitted to fight in retaliation for the injustice (see JUSTICE AND INJUSTICE) done them by the Meccans (Q 22:39-40). Then came the order to fight the infidels generally, yet certain restrictions were prescribed. Eventually ALL RESTRICTIONS WERE REMOVED and ALL TREATIES with infidels WERE REPUDIATED by Q 9:1-14, and the ultimate divine orders were expressed in Q 9:5 and 9:29. (There are many versions of this scheme, see ‘Abdallah b. Wahb,Jami’, fol. 15b; Abu ‘Ubayd, Nasikh, 190-7; Baydawi, Anwar, i, 634; Khazin, Lubab, i, 168; Shafi’i, Tafsir, 166-73; Jassas, Ahkam, i, 256-63; cf. Ibn al-Jawzi, Nawasikh, 230.)

This evolutionary explanation relies on the technique of abrogation to account for the contradictory statements in the Quran. Although details are disputed, this explanation is not a post-quranic development constructed retrospectively (see Firestone, Jihad, exp. chaps. 3-4). In addition to its obvious rationality, this evolution is attested in the Quran itself (Q 4:77). Many exegetes, however, avoided the technique of abrogation for theological and methodological reasons, but achieved the same result by other means (e.g. Ibn al-Jawzi, Nawasikh). Thus, in spite of differences of opinions regarding the interpretation of the verses and the relations between them, the broad consensus on the main issue remained: whether by abrogation, specification or other techniques, THE ORDER TO FIGHT UNCONDITIONALLY (Q 9:5, 9:29) PREVAILED. Some commentators, however, argued that the verses allowing peace (Q 4:90, 8:61) were neither abrogated nor specified, but remained in force. By the assignation technique, peace is allowed WHEN IT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE MUSLIMS (e.g. IN TIMES OF MUSLIM WEAKNESS, see e.g. Jassas, Ahkam, ii, 220; iii, 69-70). In fact this was the position adopted by the four major schools of law (see Peters, Jihad, 32-7).

In a few verses, the cause or purpose of Muslim warfare is mentioned as self-defense, and retaliation for aggression, for the expulsion from Mecca and for the violation of treaties (Q 2:217; 4:84, 91; 5:33; 9:12-3; 22:39-40, 60:9, cf. 4:89). In one case, defense of weak brethren is adduced (Q 4:75; see BROTHER AND BROTHERHOOD). On the basis of the “sword verse” (Q 9:5) and the “jizya verse” (Q 9:29) it is clear that the purpose of fighting the idolaters IS TO CONVERT THEM TO ISLAM, whereas the purpose of fighting the People of the Book IS TO DOMINATE.

Many commentators interpret Q 2:193 and 8:39 (“fight them until there is no more fitna“) as an instruction to convert all the polytheists to Islam BY FORCE IF NEED BE (e.g. Khazin, Lubab, ii, 183; Jassas, Ahkam, i, 260). It appears, however, that fitna (see DISSENSION; PARTIES AND FACTIONS) originally did not mean polytheism, but referred to attempts by infidels to entice Muslims away from Islam. Such attempts are mentioned in many Quranic verses (e.g. Q 3:149; 14:30; 17:73-4; for Q 2:193 see e.g. Tabari, Tafsir, ii, 254 see APOSTASY). Thus the purpose of war in Q 2:193 and 8:39 would be not conversion of infidels, but the preservation of the Muslim community. Conversion as the purpose of Muslim warfare is also implied by some interpretations of Q 2:192 and 48:16. In later literature the formulation of the purpose of war is “that God’s word reign supreme” (li-takuna kalimatu llahi hiya l-ulya), but in the Quran this phrase is not associated with warfare (Q 9:40; cf. 9:33 = 61:9; 48:28)

Hence, no matter what position one takes the fact remains that there is nothing in this particular version of the hadith that refutes the fact that Muhammad was sent to terrorize and kill all those who refused to submit to his religion.

With the foregoing in view we are now ready to proceed to the third part of our discussion https://answeringislamblog.wordpress.com/2016/12/28/the-prophet-of-terror-and-mayhem-pt-3/.

Source: https://answeringislamblog.wordpress.com/2016/12/28/the-prophet-of-terror-and-mayhem-pt-2/ 

IHS

The Prophet of Terror and Mayhem Pt. 3

We come to the final part of our analysis https://answeringislamblog.wordpress.com/2016/12/28/the-prophet-of-terror-and-mayhem-pt-2/.

FIGHTING THE “IDOLATERS”

Another manner that Muslims try to explain away this hadith is by quoting a differing, varying form of this narration, one that has Muhammad saying that he had been ordered to fight the idolaters:

It was narrated from Anas bin Malik that:

The Prophet said: “I have been commanded to fight the idolators until they bear witness to La ilaha illallah (there is none worthy of worship except Allah) and that Muhammad is His slave and Messenger. If they bear witness to La ilaha illallah and that Muhammad is His slave and Messenger, and they pray as we pray and face our Qiblah, and eat our slaughtered animals, then their blood and wealth becomes forbidden to us except for a right that is due.”

Grade: Sahih (Darussalam)

Reference: Sunan an-Nasa’i 3966

In-book reference: Book 37, Hadith 1

English translation: Vol. 5, Book 37, Hadith 3971 (Sunnah.com http://sunnah.com/nasai/37/1)

It was narrated from Anas bin Malik that:

The Messenger of Allah said: “I have been commanded to fight the idolators until they bear witness to La ilaha illallah (there is none worthy of worship except Allah) and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah. If they bear witness to La ilaha illallah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and they face our Qiblah, eat our slaughtered animals, and pray as we do, then their blood and wealth become forbidden except for a right that is due, and they will have the same rights and obligations as the Muslims.”

Grade: Sahih (Darussalam)

Reference: Sunan an-Nasa’i 3967

In-book reference: Book 37, Hadith 2

English translation: Vol. 5, Book 37, Hadith 3972 (https://sunnah.com/nasai/37/2)

Some Muhammadan polemicists take this to mean that Muhammad was only sent to fight all the pagan Arabs until they became Muslims, since the Quran doesn’t categorize Jews and Christians as idolaters.

The problem with this interpretation is that it ignores the fact that the Arabic word that is often rendered as idolater is mushrik. A mushrik is one who commits the unforgiveable sin of shirk, which is the crime of associating partners with Allah in his exclusive divine attributes, functions and/or worship:

Lo! Allah forgiveth not that a partner should be ascribed unto Him. He forgiveth (all) save that to whom He will. Whoso ascribeth partners to Allah, he hath indeed invented a tremendous sin. S. 4:48 Pickthall – cf. v. 116; 2:22; 39:65

As such, an idolater is anyone who claims that there are other divine beings besides Allah, or that Allah has a divine offspring, or believes that Allah exists as a multi-personal Being such as the Christian doctrine of the Holy and Blessed Trinity.

This is why the Quran groups both Jews and Christians as “idolaters” along with the pagan Arabs, since the Quran accuses them of worshiping other beings as gods and lords besides Allah:

O YOU who have attained to faith! Those who ascribe divinity to aught beside God (al-mushrikoona) are nothing but impure: and so they shall not approach the Inviolable House of Worship from this year onwards And should you fear poverty, then [know that] in time God will enrich you out of His bounty, if He so wills: for, verily, God is all-knowing, wise! [And] fight against those who – despite having been vouchsafed revelation [aforetime] -do not [truly] believe either in God or the Last Day, and do not consider forbidden that which God and His Apostle have forbidden, and do not follow the religion of truth [which God has enjoined upon them] till they [agree to] pay the exemption tax with a willing hand, after having been humbled [in war]. AND THE JEWS say, “Ezra is God’s son,” while the Christians say, “The Christ is God’s son.” Such are the sayings which they utter with their mouths, following in spirit assertions made in earlier times by people who denied the truth! [They deserve the imprecation:] “May God destroy them!” How perverted are their minds! They have taken their rabbis and their monks-as well as the Christ, son of Mary-for their lords beside God, although they had been bidden to worship none but the One God, save whom there is no deity: the One who is utterly remote, in His limitless glory, from anything to which they may ascribe a share in His divinity (yushrikoona)! They want to extinguish God’s [guiding] light with their utterances: but God will not allow [this to pass], for He has willed to spread His light in all its fullness, however hateful this may be to all who deny the truth. He it is who has sent forth His Apostle with the [task of spreading] guidance and the religion of truth, to the end that He may cause it to prevail over all [false] religion -however hateful this may be to those who ascribe divinity to aught beside God (al-mushrikoona). S. 9:28-33 Muhammad Asad

The context is crystal clear that Jews and Christians are among the impure mushrikun, or those who associate divinity to others besides Allah, since they believe that Allah has a Son and have supposedly taken their rabbis and monks as lords besides Allah. This explains why Muhammad had both the Jews and Christians expelled from the Hijaz or the Arabian Peninsula:

It has been narrated by ‘Umar b. al-Khattab that he heard the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) say: I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslim. (Sahih Muslim, Book 019, Number 4366 http://searchtruth.com/book_display.php?book=019&translator=2&start=0&number=4366)

Narrated Ibn ‘Umar:
Umar expelled the Jews and the Christians from Hijaz. When Allah’s Apostle had conquered Khaibar, he wanted to expel the Jews from it as its land became the property of Allah, His Apostle, and the Muslims. Allah’s Apostle intended to expel the Jews but they requested him to let them stay there on the condition that they would do the labor and get half of the fruits. Allah’s Apostle told them, “We will let you stay on thus condition, as long as we wish.” So, they (i.e. Jews) kept on living there until ‘Umar forced them to go towards Taima’ and Ariha’. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 39, Number 531 http://searchtruth.com/book_display.php?book=39&translator=1&start=0&number=531)

Now compare this with Muhammad’s orders to expel the pagans from the Arabian Peninsula:

Narrated Said bin Jubair:
Ibn ‘Abbas said… “The Prophet on his death-bed, gave three orders saying, ‘Expel the pagans from the Arabian Peninsula, respect and give gifts to the foreign delegates as you have seen me dealing with them.’ I forgot the third (order)” (Ya’qub bin Muhammad said, “I asked Al-Mughira bin ‘Abdur-Rahman about the Arabian Peninsula and he said, ‘It comprises Mecca, Medina, Al-Yamama and Yemen.’” Ya’qub added, “And Al-Arj, the beginning of Tihama.”) (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 52, Number 288 http://searchtruth.com/book_display.php?book=52&translator=1&start=0&number=288)

The fact that the Muslims expelled both the Jews and Christians from the Hijaz confirms that Muhammad viewed them as unclean “idolaters” much like the Arab pagans of Arabia.

If the above wasn’t clear enough to establish the point that the context of Q. 9:28 includes Jews and Christians as being among those categorized as unclean mushrikin, then note how certain Muslim scholars of the past interpreted this specific reference: 

Idolators are no longer allowed into Al-Masjid Al-Haram

Allah commands His believing servants, who are pure in religion and person, to expel the idolators who are filthy in the religious sense, from Al-Masjid Al-Haram. After the revelation of this Ayah, idolators were no longer allowed to go near the Masjid. This Ayah was revealed in the ninth year of Hijrah. The Messenger of Allah sent `Ali in the company of Abu Bakr that year to publicize to the idolators that no Mushrik will be allowed to perform Hajj after that year, nor a naked person allowed to perform Tawaf around the House. Allah completed this decree, made it a legislative ruling, as well as, a fact of reality. `Abdur-Razzaq recorded that Jabir bin `Abdullah commented on the Ayah… 

<O you who believe! Verily, the Mushrikin are impure. So let them not come near Al-Masjid Al-Haram after this year> “Unless it was a servant or one of the people of Dhimmah.” Imam Abu `Amr Al-Awza’i said, “Umar bin `Abdul-`Aziz wrote (to his governors) TO PREVENT JEWS AND CHRISTIANS FROM ENTERING THE MASJIDS OF MUSLIMS, AND HE FOLLOWED HIS ORDER WITH ALLAH’S STATEMENT…

<Verily, the Mushrikin are impure.>” `Ata’ said, “All of the Sacred Area [the Haram] is considered a Masjid, for Allah said…

<So let them not come near Al-Masjid Al-Haram (at Makkah) after this year.> This Ayah indicates that idolators are impure and that the believers are pure. In the Sahih is the following…

<<The believer does not become impure.>> Allah said… 

<and if you fear poverty, Allah will enrich you, out of His bounty.> Muhammad bin Ishaq commented, “The people said, ‘Our markets will be closed, our commerce disrupted, and what we earned will vanish.’ So Allah revealed this verse…

<and if you fear poverty, Allah will enrich you, out of His bounty>, from other resources…

<if He wills>, until…

<… and feel themselves subdued.> This Ayah means, ‘this will be your compensation for the closed markets that you feared would result.’ Therefore, Allah compensated them for the losses they incurred because they severed ties with idolators, by the Jizyah they earned from the People of the Book.” Similar statements were reported from Ibn `Abbas, Mujahid, `Ikrimah, Sa`id bin Jubayr, Qatadah and Ad-Dahhak and others. Allah said…

<Surely, Allah is All-Knowing>, in what benefits you…

<All-Wise>, in His orders and prohibitions, for He is All-Perfect in His actions and statements, All-Just in His creations and decisions, Blessed and Hallowed be He. This is why Allah compensated Muslims for their losses by the amount of Jizyah that they took from the people of Dhimmah. (Tafsir Ibn Kathir, Q. 9:28 http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2568&Itemid=64)

The foregoing proves beyond any shadow of doubt that Muhammad considered Jews and Christians as impure “idolaters,” which is why he barred them from approaching the so-called “holy” places of Islam, such as the pagan shrine of the Kabah in Mecca.

A Muslim may interject and quote the following verse to establish that the Quran differentiates Jews and Christians from the idolaters:

Lo! those who disbelieve, among the People of the Scripture AND the idolaters (wa’al-mushrikeena), will abide in fire of hell. They are the worst of created beings. S. 98:6 Pickthall

In the first place, this verse doesn’t help the Muslim cause since Jews and Christians who reject Muhammad are still placed alongside the idolaters as the worst of all creatures!

Secondly, there are verses where Jews and Christians are distinguished from the so-called believers:

Verily! Those who believe AND those who are Jews AND Christians, and Sabians, whoever believes in Allah and the Last Day and do righteous good deeds shall have their reward with their Lord, on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve. S. 2:62 Hilali-Khan

Lo! those who believe, AND those who are Jews, AND Sabaeans, AND Christians – Whosoever believeth in Allah and the Last Day and doeth right – there shall no fear come upon them neither shall they grieve. S. 5:69 Pickthall

This day (all) the good things are allowed to you; and the food of those who have been given the Book is lawful for you and your food is lawful for them; and the chaste from among the believing women AND the chaste from among those who have been given the Book before you (are lawful for you); when you have given them their dowries, taking (them) in marriage, not fornicating nor taking them for paramours in secret; and whoever denies faith, his work indeed is of no account, and in the hereafter he shall be one of the losers. S. 5:5 Shakir

Since Q. 9:28 insinuates that only the “believers” (i.e. Muslims) are pure enough to approach the supposed sacred Mosque,

O believers, the idolaters are indeed unclean; so let them not come near the Holy Mosque after this year of theirs. If you fear poverty, God shall surely enrich you of His bounty, if He will; God is All-knowing; All-wise. Arberry

And since Jews and Christians are distinguished from the “believers,” this again confirms that the Jews and Christians come under the category of impure “idolaters” who are to be banished from ever entering into Mecca.

Thus, it is clear from the foregoing that the reason Q. 98:6 lists the idolaters in a separate category from the People of the Book, i.e. Jews and Christians, is not because the Quran denies that the Jews and Christians are among the unclean idolaters. Rather, the text is using the moniker to identify the kind of religion that the pagan Arabs belonged to, e.g., they were neither Jews nor Christians, nor were they among those who had been given a divinely inspired Book. The pagans of Arabia didn’t have a specific label for their beliefs and practices. They were those who ascribed divinity to beings and objects along with Allah, and were therefore idolaters.

LET THE MUSLIM SCHOLARS SPEAK!

The following comments are taken from http://www.islamqa.com, an Islamic site that is under the general supervision of Shaykh Muhammad Saalih al-Munajjid, a renowned Salafi scholar. The site seeks to provide answers from Muslim scholars to commonly asked questions. Unlike the Muhammadan propagandists of the West, these Muslims don’t feel the need to appease westerners or Jews and Christians by interpreting the Quran in a manner which would be agreeable to their sensitivities. The authors are very blunt and to the point in answering the question of whether Jews and Christians are both unbelievers AND pagans/idolaters.

In response to a question on whether the Quran refers to the Christian belief in the Trinity as kufr (infidelity) and shirk, the writers state that:

Yes, this belief is mentioned in the Qur’aan, but that is by way of refutation and proving it to be false, and describing the one who believes in it AS A KAAFIR AND MUSHRIK. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning)… [quotes Q. 5:17, 73 and 9:30-31]

This is something that is well known among the Muslims, and they are UNANIMOUSLY AGREED that the Christians are kaafirs, and even that those who do not regard them as kaafirs ARE ALSO KAAFIRS. Shaykh Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhaab said concerning the things which are unanimously agreed to nullify Islam:

“Whoever does not regard the mushrikoon as kaafirs, or doubts that they are kaafirs, or thinks their religion is correct, is himself a kaafir.”… (Question No. 12713, Is the trinity that the Christians believe in mentioned in Islam? https://islamqa.info/en/12713; bold and capital emphasis and comments within brackets ours)

And this is what the site says in regards to the Quran’s command to fight Jews and Christians in Q. 9:29:

– He then stated the reason that made it obligatory to fight them, which was their disbelief in Allaah AND THEIR SHIRK – which included their speaking ill of Allaah by attributing a son to Him, when He is the One, the Self-Sufficient Master, He begets not, nor was He begotten, and there is none co-equal or comparable unto Him. The Jews said that ‘Uzayr is a son of Allaah, and the Christians said that the Messiah was a son of Allaah. ‘Uzayr was a righteous man from among the Children of Israel, who was venerated by the Jews. It was said that the reason why he was venerated was that he had memorized the Tawraat (Torah), so the Jews, or some of them, exaggerated about him and claimed that he was a son of Allaah. So Allaah condemned them for that and told them that by saying this they were doing the same as the mushrikeen who said that the angels were daughters of Allaah. The Christians also spoke ill of Allaah when they said that the Messiah was a son of Allaah; by doing so they resembled the Jews and mushrikeen… (Question No. 9459, The Jews’ idea that ‘Uzayr is “a son of Allaah” https://islamqa.info/en/9459; bold and capital emphasis ours)

And here is their answer to the question of whether Jews and Christians are among the mushrikin:

Secondly:

The Jews and Christians are both kaafirs and mushrikeen. They are kaafirs because they deny the truth and reject it. AND THEY ARE MUSHRIKEEN because they worship someone other than Allaah.

Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning) [quotes Q. 9:30-31]…

Here they are described AS MUSHRIKEEN. In Soorat al-Bayyinah they are described as kaafirs, as Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning)…[quotes Q. 98:1]

Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz said, REFUTING those who say that the word mushrikeen cannot be applied to the People of the Book:

It is most likely that the people of the Book are included among the mushrikeen, men and women alike, when this word is used in general terms, because the kuffaar are undoubtedly mushrikeen. Hence they are forbidden to enter al-Masjid al-Haraam, because Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning)… [quotes Q. 9:28]

If the People of the Book did not come under the general heading of mushrikeen, then this verse would not apply to them, and Allaah would not have referred to the beliefs of the Jews and Christians in Soorat Baraa’ah (al-Tawbah) where He says (interpretation of the meaning)… [quotes Q. 9:31]

So they are ALL DESCRIBED AS MUSHRIKEEN, because the Jews said that ‘Uzayr is the son of God and the Christians said that the Messiah is the son of God; and because they took their priests and rabbis as lords instead of Allaah. All of this is the worst form of shirk. And there are many similar verses. End quote.  

Majmoo’ Fataawa al-Shaykh Ibn Baaz, 4/274

And Allaah knows best. (Question No. 67626, The difference between the mushrikeen and the kuffaar, and to which category do the Jews and Christians belong? https://islamqa.info/en/67626; bold and capital emphasis and comments within brackets ours)

Let the reader note that the above scholars are basing their views on the plain reading of the Quranic texts. In fact, the above fatwa is from Sheikh Ibn Baaz, who wasn’t just any scholar but the Mufti of Saudi Arabia, and considered by many to be the highest Islamic authority of his time (http://www.fatwa-online.com/biography-of-shaykh-ibn-baaz/).

CONCLUSION 

Our thorough examination showed that Muhammad was a self-professed terrorist sent to slaughter the unbelievers unless and until they agreed to submit to his whims and desires. The evidence we presented and discussed proves that Muhammad wasn’t simply sent to terrify and murder those who declared war against him and his community. Rather, Muhammad was commissioned by his god to terrorize and attack people simply because they were unbelievers who did not worship the Muslim deity or accept him as a prophet. Therefore, whether Muslims like it or not the fact remains that the Islamic sources confirm that Muhammad was the first Muslim terrorist.

What makes this so tragic is that Muhammad’s life and teachings continue to influence Muslims till now to carry out the same tyranny and destruction that their prophet and his companions committed in the name of their deity. And no thanks to Muhammad’s personal example, the “infidels” continue to experience pain and misery till this very day.

Further Reading

Are Jews and Christians Mushriks according to the Quran? http://answeringislam.net/Shamoun/badawi_mushrik.htm

Fighting All People Until They Do What? http://www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/fight_until.html

“Kill those who Associate Partners (Mushrikun) Wherever You Find Them!” http://answeringislam.net/authors/shamoun/q9_5_29.html

The Verse of the Sword: Sura 9:5 and Jihad http://answering-islam.org/Silas/swordverse.htm

Muhammad and the Meccans: Who Antagonized Whom? http://answering-islam.org/Shamoun/antagonizing.htm

Muhammad the Antagonist Still! http://answeringislam.net/authors/shamoun/rebuttals/zawadi/mo_antagonizer.html

Is Muhammad really the Prophet of Mercy? http://answeringislam.net/Responses/Abualrub/mo_mercy.htm

Do the Authentic Teachings of Islam Result in Terrorism? [Part 1 http://answeringislam.net/Responses/Abualrub/terrorism1.htm], [Part 2 http://answeringislam.net/Responses/Abualrub/terrorism2.htm]

Source: https://answeringislamblog.wordpress.com/2016/12/28/the-prophet-of-terror-and-mayhem-pt-3/ 

IHS