Sunday, 24 September 2017

The Myth of Islamic Purity, Part 1 (of 3)

Once upon a time there lived a man named Muhammad who claimed that his religion, the Islamic religion, was a perfect religion of absolute purity.

But is it really?
This article will attempt to make clear that no human being or religion has ever done as much harm to the well-being of humanity as has Muhammad bin Abdullah of Arabian fame and his barbaric cult of Islam.

To this day, Muslims still believe that Islam is a perfect religion and the only true religion on earth. In fact the Islamists, the “true believers”, must believe and respect everything that Muhammad said and did. Muslims must not only believe that Islam is the one and only true religion on earth, they must also believe that all other religions are grossly inaccurate and ultimately offensive to God. Muhammad certainly made many extreme and dangerous statements.

“Islamic Purity” is another one of the many idiotic myths commonly believed by Muslims. In reality, Islam is anything but pure and true. It is quite laughable to read through Muhammad’s murder manual, the unholy Quran, and notice how many times it claims the religion to be perfect and pure. The tall claim that Islam is a religion of truth and purity and a religion of peace and justice is preposterous. Such falsehoods could only be believed by the uninformed or the feeble-minded.

The Notion of Islamic Purity:
The Islamic “holy books” are filled with empty claims stating that Islam is a pure and true religion. For 1400 years, many well-meaning Muslims have dedicated their lives attempting to improve and advance Muhammad’s cult of death and destruction. It is high-time that Muslims take a good hard look at the life of Muhammad and the details of this sick man’s religion of fear and hatred. It is ridiculous that educated Muslims are still stubbornly refusing to acknowledge that the prophet of Islam was indeed a mad man.

Throughout the centuries, Muslims have invested enormous amounts of time and energy trying to improve, beautify and purify Muhammad’s religion. Yet despite all of their efforts, Islam has failed Muslims horribly. In the end, the cruel injustice of Sharia law is the bitter fruit that Islam has historically produced over and over again the devout and obedient followers of Muhammad. Muslims always end up killing each other and trying to conquer others.

One of Islam’s most common attempts to achieve “Islamic purity” is wudu (ablution). Performing wudu – the washing of various parts of the body over and over again before performing salat (Islamic rituals of prayer) – is surely one of the more ridiculous of Islam’s many outlandish rituals. Having to repeat the washing of specific parts of the body over and over again 5 times a day is obvious proof of Muhammad’s obsessive compulsive disorder and the complete control he had over the lives of his brainwashed band of seventh century bandits.

Another false image of Islamic purity is to be found in the elaborate works of art that decorate many mosques. These works are another testament to Muslim’s attempt to portray Islam as a religion of beauty and purity. Of course Muhammad would have forbidden such efforts and instead demanded that his followers wage jihad and collect the booty for him. Unfortunately for the misguided Mohammedans, no amount of adornment can cover up or make clean the dark heart in the chest of Islam. For in truth, Islam is overflowing with the worst kinds of evil. The Islamic religion, in many parts and taken on the whole, is an abomination worthy of being despised.

Since the day that Muhammad’s cruel cult sprung out of the Arabian Desert it has
destroyed countless number of humans with its horrific doctrines of intolerance and injustice. There are many ludicrous statements to be found in the Quran and Sunnah stating that Islam is a religion of purity. The only challenge is choosing which passages most effectively show Islam to be the laughable fraud that it is. Here are just a few samples taken from Mad Moe’s evil and fundamentally flawed religious cult:

Claims of Islamic purity:
The Quranic passage below is nonsense. The verse is filled with lies. First, the Quran was not revealed to Muhammad. The Quran is the creation of Muhammad’s madness and lies that he used to take whatever he wanted. Secondly, there is no such thing as Muhammad’s Islamic god Allah. What an insult to God if there actually is some sort of god! Thirdly, the Islamic religion is far from pure. The Islamic religion and its prophet are filthy, evil trash.

Quran, 039.002: Lo! We have revealed the Scripture unto thee (Muhammad) with truth; so worship Allah, making religion pure for Him (only).

The Quranic verse below is vary similar to the one above. The Quran is full of repetitious garbage. Again, the verse is pure lies. And again, as in the above verse, Muhammad claims that those are God’s words. Muhammad was insane and Islam is a pack of lies with a few good things thrown into it for the weaklings and the suckers to cling to. Such is the nature of a cult.

Quran, 039.011:Say (O Muhammad): Lo! I am commanded to worship Allah, making religion pure for Him (only).

Muslims must lie to themselves and others when they say that Islam is a pure and perfect religion. For example, for every good thing that Muhammad said about women, he said just as many bad things. Islam is full of contradictions, cruelty and gross injustice. Here are some of many disgusting and harmful things that Muhammad said about women:

They ask thee concerning women’s courses. Say: They are a hurt and a pollution: So keep away from women in their courses, and do not approach them until they are clean. But when they have purified themselves, ye may approach them in any manner, time, or place ordained for you by Allah. For Allah loves those who turn to Him constantly and He loves those who keep themselves pure and clean.

Your women are a tilth for you (to cultivate) so go to your tilth as ye will, and send (good deeds) before you for your souls, and fear Allah, and know that ye will (one day) meet Him. Give glad tidings to believers, (O Muhammad).

And women shall have rights similar to the rights against them, according to what is equitable; but men have a degree (of advantage) over them.

So if a husband divorces his wife (irrevocably), He cannot, after that, re-marry her until after she has married another husband and He has divorced her.

Marry women of your choice, Two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess (female sex slave), that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice.

* Of course the words “or (a captive) that your right hands possess” mean female sex slaves.

Allah (thus) directs you as regards your Children’s (Inheritance): to the male, a portion equal to that of two females:

Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess:

Men are in charge of women, because Allah has made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great.

Hadith, Sahih Bukhari,Volume 7, Book 62, Number 31: Narrated Ibn ‘Umar: Evil omen was mentioned before the Prophet: The Prophet said, “If there is evil omen in anything, it is in the house, the woman and the horse.”

Hadith, Sahih Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62, Number 122: Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “If a woman spends the night deserting her husband’s bed (does not sleep with him), then the angels send their curses on her till she comes back (to her husband).”

Hadith, Sahih Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 54, Number 460: Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “If a husband calls his wife to his bed (i.e. to have sexual relation) and she refuses and causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning.”

Hadith, Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 2, Number 28: Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas: The Prophet said: “I was shown the Hell-fire and that the majority of its dwellers were women who were ungrateful.” It was asked, “Do they disbelieve in Allah?” (or are they ungrateful to Allah?) He replied, “They are ungrateful to their husbands and are ungrateful for the favors and the good (charitable deeds) done to them. If you have always been good (benevolent) to one of them and then she sees something in you (not of her liking), she will say, ‘I have never received any good from you.”

Hadith: Sunan Abu Dawud, Book 11, No. 2142: Narrated Umar ibn al-kahttab:
The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife.


Those Muslims’ that still believe Islam to be a pure and true religion are clearly suffering from “Islamic brain damage”.

Saleem Smith is a Canadian Ex-Muslim. He has his own site in which he expresses his views on Islam and other issues. Here is a LINK to his site.


Follow please the next parts on

Billion Muslims Consider Mo a Prophet. That is a Miracle


In history, many warlords and leaders robbed killed and raped and committed genocides but they were all condemned and declared evil criminals like Genghis Khan, Hitler and Polpot. Mo was the only war lord who did all that and is still declared a perfect human being. He was arguably not only the most violent man who ever lived but he was also a nut case who did such strange and abnormal things that if done by any one else will land him in a nut house . Yet a billion Muslims consider him a role model for humanity. Now that is a miracle ..

Let us see some of the things the role model did when he was not busy with robbing, killing and raping.


Whether this gesture was sexual in nature or not it is a nutty thing to lie down with a dead woman and think that it will give her a ticket to paradise. .

Hadith 34424 Kanezel omall. This is from a book called “Kanz Al Umal” (The Treasure of the Workers), in the chapter of “The issues of women”, authored by Ali Ibn Husam Aldin, commonly known as Al-Mutaki Al-Hindi. He based his book on the hadiths and sayings listed in “Al-Jami Al-Saghir,” written by Jalal ul-Din Al-Suyuti.

Narrated by Ibn Abbas: “I (Muhammad) put on her my shirt that she may wear the clothes of heaven, and I SLEPT with her in her coffin (grave) that I may lessen the pressure of the grave. She was the best of Allah’s creatures to me after Abu Talib”… The prophet was referring to Fatima , the mother of Ali.

If you bathed in sewage water with fecal matter in it , will your wife let you come near her ? .Well our Prophet did just that it and not only his wives slept with him but wives of his disciples also came and slept with him

He had a strange theory that water cannot become dirty. He would go and swim in Budaah well in which people threw , garbage, dead animals , fecal matter and rags with menstrual blood in it. Not only that, after bathing in it he went to the mosque and lead prayer and all the Muslims prayed behind this stinking imam.. Nobody dared to speak up and criticize him or say that he stunk . They knew criticizing prophet was blasphemy punishable with death.

Here are some hadiths

Abu Dawood ,Book 1, Number 0066:Narrated AbuSa’id al-Khudri: The people asked the Messenger of Allah (peace_be_upon_him): Can we perform ablution out of the well of Buda’ah, which is a well into which menstrual clothes, dead dogs and stinking things were thrown? He replied: Water is pure and is not defiled by anything.

Abu Dawood,Book 1, Number 0067:Narrated AbuSa’id al-Khudri:I heard that the people asked the Prophet of Allah (peace_be_upon_him): Water is brought for you from the well of Buda’ah. It is a well in which dead dogs, menstrual clothes and excrement of people are thrown. The Messenger of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) replied: Verily water is pure and is not defiled by anything.

Tafsir Qurtubi, chapter vol 13, page 5. Prophet drank dirty water from Budaah well and performed wudu with it. (For other references to Prophet’s(PBUH) bathing, drinking and making wudu with the water from Budaah well with dead dogs, garbage and menstrual blood listen to the last part of the following debate between a Muslim scholar and a Christian Arab):


Needless to say that a man who bathed in filthy water of Budaah well will not mind having lice in his beard and head.. Our prophet used to walk around and visit his disciples with lice falling off his beard and head. The embarrassed muslim women often tried to take care of his lice problem..

Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 87, Number 130:Allah’s Apostle used to visit Um Haram bint Milhan she was the wife of ‘Ubada bin As-Samit. One day the Prophet visited her and she provided him with food and started looking for lice in his head.

Abu Dawood Book 19, Number 3074: She was picking lice from the head of the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) while the wife of Uthman ibn Affan and the immigrant women were with him.


How many of us wake up in the middle of night and go to a grave yard alone without any rhyme or reason , stand there for a long time making hand signals. And if we did , will we be considered sane …

Muslim Book 004, Number 2127: ‘A’isha narrated this:: When it was my turn for Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) to spend the night with me, he turned his side, put on his mantle and took off his shoes and placed them near his feet, and spread the corner of his shawl on his bed and then lay down till he thought that I had gone to sleep. He took hold of his mantle slowly and put on the shoes slowly, and opened the door and went out and then closed it lightly. I covered my head, put on my veil and tightened my waist wrapper, and then went out following his steps till he reached Baqi (cemetery)’. He stood there and he stood for a long time. He then lifted his hands three times, and then returned.


Liking oral sex is one thing but performing it on a menstruating woman and then falling asleep on top of her private parts , you have to be either crazy or addicted to menstrual blood.

Here is a hadith where Prophet asked his menstruating wife Aisha to open her thighs , then he put his head there and later fell asleep with his head between her thighs… The hadiths stopped short of saying that he performed oral sex on Aisha but it seems, that’s what he did. . Either Aisha was too embarrassed to mention it or the later embarrassed muslims removed that part from the sahih hadith..

Sunaan Abu Dawud: Book 1, Number 0270: Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu’minin: Aisha said “ One night Prophet of Allah entered (upon me) while I was menstruating He said: Come near me. I said: I am menstruating. He said: Uncover your thighs. I, therefore, uncovered both of my thighs. Then he put his cheek and chest on my thighs and I lent upon him until he became warm and slept.

It seems that he had also recited Quran before falling asleep.

Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 93, Number 639: Narrated ‘Aisha:The Prophet used to recite the Quran with his head in my lap while I used to be in my periods (having menses).


Every one likes privacy. But you don’t pierce a sharp arrow into the eye of some one who peeps in your room.

Bukhari Volume 9, Book 83, Number 38a: Narrated Anas: A man peeped into one of the dwelling places of the Prophet. The Prophet got up and aimed a sharp-edged arrow head (or wooden stick) at him to poke him stealthily.


Mo used to tell ridiculous make believe fairy tales of meeting jinns, wrestling with them, tieing them to a mosque pillar, reciting quran to their gatherings etc etc. He said jinns eat bones and their horses eat dung. (he instructed muslims never to use bones to clean themselves after defecating). Every one call such a man loonie but muslims call him prophet and consider him holier than god.(South park drew cartoons of God and Jesus, it did not bother muslims , when they drew cartoon of Mo, they went beserk)

Here is such a story of Mo describing his quran recital to a gathering of bone eating jinns ( who were made of fire) who rode to the event on dung eating horses ..

Muslim, Book 004, Number 0903:Ibn Masud says “we were in the company of the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) one night and he went missing. We searched for him in the valleys and the hills. We thought he was secretly killed by somebody. We spent the worst night which people could ever spend. When it was dawn we saw him coming from the side of Hiri’. We said: Messenger of Allah, we missed you and searched for you, but we could not find you and we spent the worst night which people could ever spend. He (the Holy Prophet) said: A Jinn came to me to invite on behalf of a group of jinns and I went along with him and recited to them the Qur’an. Prophet then went along with us and showed us their traces and traces of their embers. They (the Jinn) asked him (the Holy Prophet) about their provision and he said: Every bone on which the name of Allah is recited is your provision. The time it will fall in your hand it would be covered with flesh, and the dung of (the camels) is fodder for your animals. The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: Don’t perform istinja (clean yourself) with these (things) for these are the food of your brothers (Jinn).



Koran Contains not a Hint at Peace

Editor’s Note: This is a worthy article written about eight years ago by a university professor who understood Islam too well

Moshe Sharon is an Arabic studies researcher. He is a professor of the Oriental studies department of the Jewish University in Jerusalem - When I asked my student, Armi Abu, who is in our chair, and by the way, a nephew of Arafat: “What kind of peace do you want?”, he promptly answered: “What kind of peace do you mean? What we mean is a temporary cease-fire”. This is the logical misunderstanding of the Oslo agreements and what these agreements mean at all. The Arab terminology differs greatly from what Europeans mean, – the professor goes on.

The Arab language has many nuances. To understand an Arab phrase one  has to understand the context and follow the intonation. Not everything you hear should be accepted as real. Most of our Israeli politicians are completely ignorant of understanding the outlook of our enemies, especially Palestinians. If the country’s policy is based on ignorance then it is worth nothing. This is the exact image of  Israeli policy towards Palestinians now.
With this shocking monologue by professor Moshe Sharon our conversation began. - Is it true that Muslims really want to rule the whole world? Isn’t it a terrifying prospect? - Unless we understand the culture of Muslims and how their outlook differs from ours, this idea itself will seem incredible. But we have to know – this is the basis of Islam. Both secular Arabs and Muslims, who are fundamentalists, pursue the same purposes which have the same roots called Islam.
The laws of Islam are built on two inviolable principles. They are Koran and “precedents”. The word “precedents” means the life and doings of Mohammed. Whatever Mohammed did is the rule for Muslims to follow. He, according to Islam, was faultless. That is why all generations follow the laws of Islam (sharia – in Arabic), which are based on two sources. On the one hand, it is Koran, on the other hand, it is Sunah, that is commentaries, which explain Koran’s directives. The laws of Islam are the corner stones of civil, government and
criminal codes. They are also the corner stones of Arab outlook, laws of Arab countries, as well as of laws on peace and war.
- Nevertheless, Israeli politicians think that Koran and Sunah are not the today’s reality.
- This is a mistake. Moreover, it is the mistake that gave ungrounded roots for the idea “to build a new Middle East…” We, Jews, are discussing this idea between ourselves. Our idea of “a new Middle  East” is a fruit, say, product of our imagination. It is torn off from reality and does not take into account the environment we live in. Shimon Peres wrote the book called “New Middle East”, in which he solely believes in his “message to descendants”. The book made a different impression on the Arab World. Some see in it another proof of Jew’s vicious intention to spread their ruling over the whole Arab world. The reaction towards the book was not adequate. Some say that, having heard about the book, President of Egypt Mubarak asked: “What shall we do with the old Middle East? Why don’t Jews like it?” There is some kind of jealousy in this question.
- Still, the Muslims are realists. They don’t try to seize what they are not able to now.
- Nevertheless that does not mean that they shouldn’t fight. On the contrary, Muslims should wage wars until Islam conquers the whole world. Here I want to stress that Arabs do not intend to convert all people into fanatic Muslims who are praying towards Mecca 5 times a day. There is no missionary in Islam. Their aim is to put the whole world under Islam and to recognize its superiority. They divide the world into two parts – “the house of war” and “the house of Islam”. The contemporary Muslim world is “the house of Islam”. They call the part, which they try to conquer, “the house of war”. Any territory, which in some historical period was under Muslims, is considered a Muslim land forever. Therefore, creation of State of Israel on the territory that once belonged to Muslims was a historic revolution for them. Muslims cannot accept this fact in principle. Nevertheless, they are still realistic politicians… They do not hurry. They are waiting. Their actions depend on the situation, on the difference of their military might and that of the enemy.
- Is there a slightest hope to conclude peace with Arabs?
- Not in the least. The long hand of Ishmael (ancestor of all Arabs) knows no other state than that of permanent war. This is jihad, the sacred war of Muslims against “infidels”. Jihad is a duty established by Koran.
- Still, there are cases when jihad was stopped, say, by Egypt when we concluded a peace treaty with it in Camp David.
- I regret to say but many people in Israel do not understand what such treaties are worth of. Islam does not envisage in principle any peace treaty with “infidels”. Real treaties are possible only between Muslims. The principle of commanded war is always in force and waits for the time and real chance to be realized. Even Anvar Sadat who put his signature under the “peace treaty” knew that he was signing only a temporary cease-fire agreement. But Sadat made a sin and broke the commandment when he publicly announced, “There will be no war any more. No bloodshed”, – and paid his life for that.
- Tell me then what is the reason for Arabs to conclude temporary cease-fire agreements?
- The situation in the world insistently demands contacts with “infidels”. Under “infidels’” pressure Arabs have to take some obligations. Europeans are expecting real peace. But the peace offered to them by Arabs has a short life.
- How do we know that Muslims will, by all means, break the treaty, which they have signed themselves?
- It is said in “the precedent” established by Mohammed. In 628 he signed a treaty with the Kureisha tribe known as the “khadivia treaty”. At that time Kureisha warriors were stronger than his. The treaty was for 10 years. But not even two years passed and Mohammed unleashed the war and seized Mecca. Kureisha people did believe in the oath and mutual obligations and felt themselves secure. However, the temporary cease-fire agreement had also additional purpose, that is to lullaby the enemy’s vigilance. When Mohammed struck and began to advance, the citizens of Mecca crawled to him on their knees. They pleaded for negotiations to resolve contradictions that made Mohammed to renew the war. But Mohammed ordered his security not to let the delegation of respectable people of Mecca come in. Mohammed spent two years of truce for preparing for a new war because he knew that the war was inevitable. He knew about it when he was singing the peace treaty. He violated the treaty at the suitable for him moment. This is how the notion of hudna (cease-fire between enemies) was established in Islam. Muslims never sign armistice for a long and indefinite period of time. One of the main rules for them is to set the validity period of such an agreement. When Muslims feel that they are strong enough to resume the war, they should cancel the armistice. If they feel not strong enough to resume the war, they are allowed to automatically prolong the validity period of the treaty for 10 years, and not necessarily to negotiate with the opposite party about it.
- As I remember, Arafat spoke about the possibility of building a secular Palestinian state.
- His words mean nothing. Immediately after singing the agreement in Oslo he made a speech in the Johannesburg mosque (South Africa), in which he outlined his political intentions. He said that he understands peace as Islam means it. Then he resorted to the lessons from Arab history. We have to know that when an Arab leader resorts to history he means the present principles and situation because there is no such notion as “ancient” in Islam. Islam is a culture of life, the present way of life. Islam is the past that becomes the present and shows the way to the future.
Arafat publicly said that in Oslo he meant a temporary cease-fire (hudna). When he was saying this he knew he would be understood in the right way. Unfortunately, few people paid a serious attention to these words. They were addressed to those who knew “the course of events”. My friends and I tried to persuade others that Arafat’s words were a code and we had to understand the clandestine meaning of his speech. However, Israeli leaders didn’t want to listen to our advice. Jews were dreaming about peace at that time through the prophecy of Yeshayagu: “and swords will be beaten into ploughshares”. By the way, they’re some interesting facts about the treaty with Egypt. After it had been signed, a festive party was organized and President Carter made a public speech. In his speech he decided to use quotations about peace from books of the three religions. It was not difficult to find quotations on peace in Tanakha and he took those that could sound Christian. However, the President’s advisers could not find an appeal to peace in Koran. The thing is that there are no peace appeals in Koran.
- So, does it mean that Arabs’ peace assurances are a thumping lie?
- There is an Arab proverb: “Words are tax free”. We have to learn to negotiate from Palestinians. They follow the example of a Muslim caliph Ali who negotiated with the rebelled ruler of Damascus when each side was not able to gain victory…The caliph’s representative suggested that the enemy should speak first. He wanted to know the enemy’s plans before making his own decision. The enemy spoke first and step-by-step disclosed everything he had in mind. The caliph’s representative was listening attentively and assenting to him occasionally. After the meeting was over, the Damascus representative in his summarizing speech said that the caliph’s representative agreed that Damascus should receive independence. His opponent stopped him and said, “I have never agreed to this”. This classic example should teach us not to make proposals. We have to make the opponent disclose his position. When the opponent knows what your interests are, their costs immediately go up. When Begin started negotiating I told him, “Do not come out with proposals. Let them speak out.” But even Begin was not ready to understand and accept this. There were negotiations with Palestinians in 1996. Peres was negotiating with Arafat. Peres was very pleased with the talks and said after the meeting, ” They agree with all Israeli proposals. To each proposal they were approvingly nodding their heads”. Exactly like caliph Ali’s representative did…
- Tell me, do Arabs mean real war when they speak about jihad?
- Those who support Muslims try to represent this notion like it looks in the West. They say it is a “struggle” for Muslims’ interests. It is not true. This is a bloody war to the final victory until the enemy surrenders to Islam.
Traditional Muslim books say that Islam will take over the world but only after Muslims defeat and destroy Jews. These books also say that Jews will hide themselves behind trees and rocks. But the time comes and one “great day” the rocks and trees will start shouting: ” Hey, Muslim, there is a Jew behind me! Come and kill him!” Only one tree will keep silence. In Islamic it is called “el oseg” (the tree of Jews). I mean the tree of sne (a bush from which God appeared before Moshe). This tree is mentioned in Muslim books for Muslims not to forget to look for Jews even behind this tree. These books are studied in all Arab schools, and political leaders make quotations from them in their speeches.
- What do we have to do then?
- Our task is to make Arabs disarm and sign a cease-fire treaty for a long term.
- How can we achieve this if any treaty for Arabs is rather conventional?
- There should be a reason for Islam to abandon the idea of war. The reason can be our military supremacy over them. For example, in 1229, Sultan El Melek El Kamal from Egypt handed Jerusalem, which had been under Muslims since the rule of Saladin, over to the Christian king Fredrik the Great, because the latter made the whole world fear him…
Israel’s policy is weak and, thus, leaves no choice for Palestinians. Under this condition they simply must fight with us. Until now they have no military might to oppose Israel, that’s why they try to weaken the Jewish state.
If we become much stronger than them, they will have to postpone jihad again and again. They should feel our might; they should feel they can’t defeat us. Only then they will disarm even if the terms are not favourable for them.


Monday, 28 August 2017

Prophetic Traits of Apostel of Allah


Our prophet had eleven wives (including permanent sex slaves Rehana and Maria Quptia). he was so fair in love making that whenever he had an urge to have sex with one of his lovely teenage wives and made love to her , he considered it his moral obligation to have sex with all of them including those for whom he had zero attraction (like fat fifty something Sauda) , the same day (or night). It did not matter if it took him a whole day or night to accomplish that duty. ( due to his old age it took him longer to recuperate after each encounter)

Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 5, Number 268: “The Prophet used to visit (have sex) with all his wives in a round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number.

Bukhari,Volume 7, Book 62, Number 6: The Prophet used to go round (have sexual relations with) all his wives in one night

Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 5, Number 270: Aisha said, “I scented Allah’s Apostle and he went round (had sexual intercourse with) all his wives.”

Abu Hudaifa was an aging arab who had a teenage slave boy (Salim) . and a beautiful young wife . He always harassed his wife if she and the the slave boy did hanky panky behind his back. Finally she got sick and tired of his accusations and went to the prophet to get his prophetic advise. He told her to suckle Salim her breasts so that by sharia he becomes her son making sex between the two haram. She came and told Hudaifa about this. He liked the idea and made Salim suck his wives breasts. After that his mind was put at ease and he could go out of town for days without worrying about them making out. Salim had now become a bonafide son of Hudaifa’s wife and could suckle on his young mom’s bossoms whenever he felt like it. That year Hudaifa’s wife gave birth to a baby boy . Hudaifa’s friends told him that his little son looked very much like his older brother Salim.

Bukhari, Book 008, Number 3425: ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Salim, the freed slave of Abu Hadhaifa, lived with him and his family in their house. Hudaifas’s wife came to Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) and said: Salim has attained (purbety) as men attain and he understands what they understand, and he enters our house freely, I, however, perceive that Hudaifa is getting suspicious of Salim and me.Wereupon Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) said to her: Suckle him and you would become unlawful for him, and (the rankling) which Abu Hudhaifa feels in his heart will disappear. She returned and said: So I suckled him, and what (was there) in the heart of Abu Hudhaifa disappeared.


During a woman’s periods , Islam considers a woman dirty and sick. She is not allowed to touch Quran, observe fast, offer obligatory pray, or even enter a mosque. Her husband is not allowed to make love to her or even touch her during her menses. However Prophet realized that the sexual urge to have sex in a woman is at it’s peak during her periods and he wanted to help them out. He therefore went out of his way and gave those dirty menstruating women sexual gratification and fulfillment by fonding them, instead of going and and having fun with those who were clean . However he made sure that when fondling them intimately he made them cover their private parts with their izars (underclothing) to avoid touching their skins not to violate sharia requirements.

Bukhari,Volume 1, Book 6, Number 299: Narrated ‘Abdur-Rahman bin Al-Aswad: (on the authority of his father) ‘Aisha said: “Whenever Allah’s Apostle wanted to fondle anyone of us during her periods (menses), he used to order her to put on an Izar and start fondling her.” ‘Aisha added, “None of you could control his sexual desires as the Prophet could.”

Bukhar, iVolume 1, Book 6, Number 300:Narrated Maimuna:When ever Allah’s Apostle wanted to fondle any of his wives during the periods (menses), he used to ask her to wear an Izar.


Quran 33.26,27: “Many ye slew, and many ye made prisoners”

During beheadings of Quraiza jews a big problem came. All males above the age of 13 were announced to be beheaded. To avoid beheadings many older males were lying about their ages and were claiming to be 11or 12 when they were actually much older . The problem was brought to our prophet who was supervising the Quraiza Massacre . He asked Allah to send him a wahi (revelation) regarding this problem . A wahi then promptly arrived that any boy who had pubic hair was to be beheaded; one who had none was to be spared.

Sunan Abu-Dawud Book 38, Number 4390: Narrated Atiyyah al-Qurazi:“I was among the captives of Banu Qurayzah. They (the Companions) examined us, and those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were killed, and those who had not were not killed. I was among those who had not grown hair.”

Some boys just 7 or 8 who had pubics were beheaded and some others who looked like 17 or 18 but had sneakily clean shaved their pubics were spared. The divine law had to be followed. to the letter .


During the Khaibar Jihad, Prophet let Dihya choose a sex slave of his own choice from a group of enslaved women. He chose 17 year old gorgeous Safia and took her away to a lonely spot to enjoy her …Some jihadis saw him making out with her behind a bush . They were so impressed by her beauty and sexy figure that they went to the prophet and described her to him. Prophet was aroused by the description and immediately canceled Dihya’s booty and ordered Safia to be brought back.

Sahih Muslim 8:3329: Anas, (Allah be pleased with him) reported: Safiyah (Allah be pleased with her) fell to the lot of Dihya in the spoils of war, and they praised her in the presence of Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) and said: We have not seen the like of her among the captives of war.

Dihya was rudely interrupted in his love making and Safia was brought back with Dihya in tow. He told Dihya to choose another slave girl in exchange of Safia. Dihya, who was already furious refused to part with Safia , cried foul and and protested loudly. Any other Chief would have been pissed off and punished him severely for insubordination. But our prophet came as a mercy for all. He instead treated him with kindness and haggled with him. Dihya demanded seven women including two younger cousins of Safia in exchange for Safia. Prophet most graciously accepted his unreasonable demand and gave him what he wanted. Safia had a very traumatic day.. Her brothers and father were killed and her husband was tortured and beheaded in front of her. On top of that Dihya had publicly disrobed her and was trying to make out behind a bush . Prohet covered her with his own robe , took her inside his tent and made love to her tenderly to relax and sooth her. Next day he further honored her by covering her in a burqa and making her a part of his harem..Hadiths say that Safia loved prophet dearly for his kinness and affection…

Sahih Muslim 8-3328: There fell to the lot of Dihya a beautiful girl, and Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) got her in exchange of seven heads.


In the Mustaleq raid pretty teenager Juavaria whose husband (Mustaleq Chief) was killed in the attack, fell to the lot of a jihadi Thabit Ibn Qais a gay jihadi who was more interested in making money than making love. He said he could free her for seven oaks of gold, an outrageus amount which no one could pay..

Our Prophet’s generosity had no bounds when buying freedom of an unfortunate young widow whose husband was killed in front of her…. He not only paid her outrageous price to the greedy jihadi to win r her freedom but he gave the teenage widow a warm place to sleep next to him in his arms and made love to her all night..



To the Believers Is He Most Kind and Merciful

A Case Study in Shirk

The words “kind(ness)” (raoofun) and “merciful” (raheemum) are used for Allah in the Qur’an. Examples of this include the following verses:

“… Allah is full of kindness (raoofun) to (His) devotees.” (Surah 2:207)
“… And Allah is full of kindness (raoofun) to those that serve Him.” (Surah 3:30)
“… For my Lord is indeed full of mercy (raheemun)…” (Surah 11:90)
“… For Allah is Oft-Returning, Most Merciful (raheemun).” (Surah 49:12)

In fact, the word raoofun, which is used eleven times in the Qur’an, is only used for Allah. The same is true for the word raheemun, which appears fifty-nine times.

Most significantly for the sake of the present study, when these two adjectives, raoofun and raheemun, are paired together, they are only used for Allah, as in the following passages:

“… For Allah is to all people most surely full of kindness, Most Merciful (laraoofun raheemun).” 2:143

“… but He [Allah] turned to them (also): for He is unto them Most Kind, Most Merciful (raoofun raheemun).” 9:117

“… for our Lord is indeed Most Kind, Most Merciful (laraoofun raheemun).” 16:7

“… For thy Lord is indeed full of kindness and mercy (laraoofun raheemun).” 16:47

“… For Allah is Most Kind and Most Merciful (laraoofun raheemun) to man.” 22:65

“Were it not for the grace and mercy of Allah on you, and that Allah is full of kindness and mercy (raoofun raheemun), (ye would be ruined indeed).” 24:20

“… And verily, Allah is to you Most Kind and Merciful (raoofun raheemun).” 57:9

“… Our Lord! Thou art indeed Full of Kindness, Most Merciful (raoofun raheemun).” 59:10

The sole exception to the above appears in Surah 9:128, which reads:

“… to the believers is he most kind and merciful (raoofun raheemun).”

In light of what has been said above, there is little doubt that anyone who only read these words from Surah 9:128 would think they are being used for Allah just as they are everywhere else. However, in context this is actually being said about Muhammad:

“Now hath come unto you a Messenger from amongst yourselves: it grieves him that ye should perish; ardently anxious is he over you: to the believers is he most kind and merciful.

Muslim authorities are even in agreement that this is spoken about Muhammad, which can be seen from the fact that Yusuf Ali and other translators do not capitalize these words in Surah 9:128 as they usually do when used for Allah (even though they are not distinguished by this method in the Arabic text, which employs no such convention to indicate when words are being used for Allah or for another besides him).

In fact, if it wasn’t already clear from the syntax that this is referring to Muhammad, it is made all the more explicit in the Hilali-Khan version:

“Verily, there has come unto you a Messenger (Muhammad SAW) from amongst yourselves (i.e. whom you know well). It grieves him that you should receive any injury or difficulty. He (Muhammad SAW) is anxious over you (to be rightly guided, to repent to Allah, and beg Him to pardon and forgive your sins, in order that you may enter Paradise and be saved from the punishment of the Hell-fire), for the believers (he SAW is) full of pity, kind, and merciful.”

The following hadith also reports a tradition that Muhammad was given these two names (among others):

Jubair b. Mut'im reported on the authority of his father that he heard Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: I have many names: I am Muhammad, I am Ahmad, I am al-Mahi through whom Allah obliterates unbelief, and I am Hashir (the gatherer) at whose feet people will be gathered, and I am 'Aqib (after whom there would be none),and Allah has named him as compassionate and merciful. (Sahih Muslim, Book 30, #5811) (emphasis mine)

Whereas the Qur’an is otherwise careful to never speak of others in the same way it does about Allah, Most Kind and Merciful, it has a falling out with itself in Surah 9:128 when it says the same thing about Muhammad, calling him, and only him in addition to Allah, “Most Kind and Merciful”.

In fact, to reiterate the point from another angle, that which was pointed out above from a systematic standpoint – i.e., approaching the Qur’an as a completed whole, observing that everywhere besides Surah 9:128 these adjectives or divine attributes are always and only predicated of Allah – may be made with equal if not greater force by looking at it from the standpoint of the chronological development of the Qur’an.

By all accounts, Muslim or Western, Surah 9 was either the last or at least one of the last Surah’s of the Qur’an to be revealed. According to the classification scheme that traces back to Ibn Abbas by way of Ata as well as the scheme held by Sir William Muir, Surah 9 was the last Surah of the Qur’an to be revealed. Similarly, in the official Egyptian edition of the Qur’an as well as in the scheme advocated by Nöldeke-Schwally, Surah 9 was the second to last Surah to be “revealed”. All other classification schemes also place Surah 9 either last or late. Moreover, various hadith also attest that the last two verses of Surah 9 were both the last verses to be revealed and also the last to be collected into the Qur’an:

On the authority of Ubayy ibn Ka`ab, they were collecting the Qur'an from the volume of Ubayy. Men were writing, while Ubayy ibn Ka`ab was dictating to them. When they reached the end of the verse in surat Bara'a {S. 9 V. 127}: Thus, God has diverted their hearts, for they are people who do not comprehend, they asserted that this verse was the last of what God, the Exalted, revealed of the Qur'an. Then, Ubayy said, "God's messenger, peace and blessings be upon him, had me recite two verses after this: Indeed, a messenger has come to you from among yourselves. Your suffering is hard on him. He is anxious over you, compassionate and merciful to the believers...", to the end of the sura. He said, "So this is the last of what was revealed of the Qur'an." (Ibn Abu Dawud, 2.30)

So, `Uthman ibn `Affan stood up and said, 'Whoever has something from the Book of God, let him bring it to us.' And nothing would be accepted until two witnesses testified to it. Then, Khuzaima ibn Thabit came and said, "I see that you left out two verse that you did not write." They said, "What are they?" He said, "I learned from God's messenger, peace and blessings be upon him, {S. 9 V. 128}: Indeed, a messenger has come to you from among yourselves. Your suffering is hard on him. He is anxious over you, compassionate and merciful to the believers...," to the end of the sura. `Uthman said, "I bear witness that they are from God. So, where do you think you should put them?" He said, "Conclude the last of what was revealed of the Qur'an with them." So Bara'a was concluded with them. (Abu Dawud, 2.31)

Narrated Zaid bin Thabit: Abu Bakr As-Siddiq sent for me when the people! of Yamama had been killed (i.e., a number of the Prophet's Companions who fought against Musailama). (I went to him) and found 'Umar bin Al-Khattab sitting with him. Abu Bakr then said (to me), "Umar has come to me and said: "Casualties were heavy among the Qurra' of the! Qur'an (i.e. those who knew the Quran by heart) on the day of the Battle of Yalmama, and I am afraid that more heavy casualties may take place among the Qurra' on other battlefields, whereby a large part of the Qur'an may be lost. Therefore I suggest, you (Abu Bakr) order that the Qur'an be collected." I said to 'Umar, "How can you do something which Allah's Apostle did not do?" 'Umar said, "By Allah, that is a good project. "Umar kept on urging me to accept his proposal till Allah opened my chest for it and I began to realize the good in the idea which 'Umar had realized." Then Abu Bakr said (to me). 'You are a wise young man and we do not have any suspicion about you, and you used to write the Divine Inspiration for Allah's Apostle. So you should search for (the fragmentary scripts of) the Qur'an and collect it in one book." By Allah If they had ordered me to shift one of the mountains, it would not have been heavier for me than this ordering me to collect the Qur'an. Then I said to Abu Bakr, "How will you do something which Allah's Apostle did not do?" Abu Bakr replied, "By Allah, it is a good project." Abu Bakr kept on urging me to accept his idea until Allah opened my chest for what He had opened the chests of Abu Bakr and 'Umar. So I started looking for the Qur'an and collecting it from (what was written on) palmed stalks, thin white stones and also from the men who knew it by heart, till I found the last Verse of Surat At-Tauba (Repentance) with Abi Khuzaima Al-Ansari, and I did not find it with anybody other than him. The Verse is:

'Verily there has come unto you an Apostle (Muhammad) from amongst yourselves. It grieves him that you should receive any injury or difficulty...(till the end of Surat-Baraa' (At-Tauba) (9.128-129) Then the complete manuscripts (copy) of the Qur'an remained with Abu Bakr till he died, then with 'Umar till the end of his life, and then with Hafsa, the daughter of 'Umar. (Bukhari, 6.61.509)

Narrated Zaid bin Thabit: Abu Bakr sent for me and said, "You used to write the Divine Revelations for Allah's Apostle : So you should search for (the Qur'an and collect) it." I started searching for the Qur'an till I found the last two Verses of

Surat At-Tauba with Abi Khuzaima Al-Ansari and I could not find these Verses with anybody other than him. (They were):

'Verily there has come unto you an Apostle (Muhammad) from amongst yourselves. It grieves him that you should receive any injury or difficulty ...' (9.128-129) (Bukhari, 6.61.511)

Narated By Zaid bin Thabit : Abu Bakr sent for me, so I collected the Qur'an till I found the last part of Surat-at-Tauba with Abi Khuzaima Al-Ansari and did not find it with anybody else. (The Verses are): 'Verily, there has come to you an Apostle (Muhammad) from amongst yourselves... (till the end of Surat Bara'a) (i.e., At-Tauba).' (9.128-129) (Bukhari, 9.93.521)

This means that Muslims up to the time that Surah 9 was revealed, particularly its last two verses, had repeatedly heard with their ears and recited with their mouths one Surah after another declaring that Allah is raoofun raheemun – Most Kind, Most Merciful. And even if the early Muslims did not self-consciously reflect upon it they most certainly would have been conditioned by all of this to think that these are divine attributes that belong to Allah. It was only after constantly making the association of these attributes with Allah that Surah 9:128 came along and declared that Muhammad in addition to Allah possesses these divine attributes (and that just shortly after saying the same thing about Allah in this very Surah – 9:117). The conclusion that Muhammad is here being given divine names or attributes would have been unavoidable.

In light of all this there can be little wonder why the Muslim translator of the Qur’an Rashad Khalifa considered this verse to be a Satanic addition or interpolation into the Qur’an. This is not only reflected in his version which completely removes this verse (along with the verse that follows), but in the footnote appended to the Surah which explains why the Bismillah in Surah 9 is absent from every version of the Qur’an, and why the two verses at the end of Surah 9 are included in all versions of the Qur’an except for his own:

“… This is the only sura that is not prefixed with the Basmalah. This phenomenon has puzzled the students of the Quran for 14 centuries, and many theories were advanced to explain it. Now we realize that the conspicuous absence of the Basmalah serves three purposes: (1) It represents an advance divine proclamation that the idol worshipers were destined to tamper with the Quran by adding 2 false verses (9:128-129). (2) It demonstrates one of the functions of God's mathematical code in the Quran, namely, to guard the Quran against any alteration. (3) It provides additional miraculous features of the Quran's code.” (Online source; emphasis mine)
Khalifah elaborates on this point somewhat in an appendix (#24) to his translation, where he says:

“Nineteen years after the Prophet Muhammad's death, during the reign of Khalifa `Uthman, a committee of scribes was appointed to make several copies of the Quran to be dispatched to the new Muslim lands. The copies were to be made from the original Quran which was written by Muhammad's hand...

This committee was supervised by `Uthman Ibn `Affaan, `Ali Ibn Abi Taaleb, Zeid Ibn Thaabet, Ubayy Ibn Ka`ab, `Abdullah Ibn Al-Zubair, Sa`eed Ibn Al-`Aas, and `Abdul Rahman Ibn Al-Haareth Ibn Heshaam. The Prophet, of course, had written the Quran in its chronological order of revelation…, together with the necessary instructions to place every piece in its proper position. The last sura revealed in Medina was Sura 9. Only Sura 110, a very short sura, was revealed after Sura 9, in Mina.

The committee of scribes finally came to Sura 9, and put it in its proper place. One of the scribes suggested adding a couple of verses to honor the Prophet. The majority of scribes agreed. `Ali was outraged. He vehemently maintained that the word of God, written down by the hand of His final prophet, must never be altered.

Ali's protest is documented in many references, but I cite and reproduce here the classic reference AL ITQAAN FEE 'ULUM AL QURAN by Jalaluddin Al-Suyuty, Al-Azhareyyah Press, Cairo, Egypt, 1318 AH, Page 59 [see Insert 1].
Khalifah elaborates on this point somewhat in an appendix (#24) to his translation, where he says:

“Nineteen years after the Prophet Muhammad's death, during the reign of Khalifa `Uthman, a committee of scribes was appointed to make several copies of the Quran to be dispatched to the new Muslim lands. The copies were to be made from the original Quran which was written by Muhammad's hand...

This committee was supervised by `Uthman Ibn `Affaan, `Ali Ibn Abi Taaleb, Zeid Ibn Thaabet, Ubayy Ibn Ka`ab, `Abdullah Ibn Al-Zubair, Sa`eed Ibn Al-`Aas, and `Abdul Rahman Ibn Al-Haareth Ibn Heshaam. The Prophet, of course, had written the Quran in its chronological order of revelation…, together with the necessary instructions to place every piece in its proper position. The last sura revealed in Medina was Sura 9. Only Sura 110, a very short sura, was revealed after Sura 9, in Mina.

The committee of scribes finally came to Sura 9, and put it in its proper place. One of the scribes suggested adding a couple of verses to honor the Prophet. The majority of scribes agreed. `Ali was outraged. He vehemently maintained that the word of God, written down by the hand of His final prophet, must never be altered.

Ali's protest is documented in many references, but I cite and reproduce here the classic reference AL ITQAAN FEE 'ULUM AL QURAN by Jalaluddin Al-Suyuty, Al-Azhareyyah Press, Cairo, Egypt, 1318 AH, Page 59 [see Insert 1].

Translation: `Ali was asked: "Why are you staying home?" He said, "Something has been added to the Quran, and I have pledged never to put on my street clothes, except for the prayer, until the Quran is restored." [ Insert 1 ]

The horrendous dimensions of this crime can be realized once we look at the consequences:
 (1) `Uthman was assassinated, and `Ali was installed as the fourth Khalifa.

(2) A 50-year war erupted between the new Khalifa and his supporters on one side, and the Mohammedan distorters of the Quran on the other side.
 (3) `Ali was martyred, and eventually his family, the prophet Muhammad's family, except for some women and children, were killed.
 (4) The disaster culminated in the infamous Battle of Karbala, where `Ali's son, Hussein, and his family were massacred.
 (5) The Muslims were deprived of the pure, unaltered, Quran for 1400 years.

The distorters of the Quran finally won the war, and the "official" history that came to us represented the victors' point of view. This apparent victory for God's enemies was, of course, in accordance with God's will. In just two decades after the Prophet's death, the idol worshipers who were defeated by the Prophet in the conquest of Mecca (632 AD) reverted to idolatry. Ironically, this time around their idol was the Prophet himself. Such idol worshipers obviously did not deserve to possess the pure Quran. Hence the blessed martyrdom of the true believers who tried to restore the Quran, and the apparent victory for the distorters of God's word.” (Online source; emphasis mine)

For the point being made here it doesn’t matter if orthodox Muslims believe that Khalifah was wrong about these verses being added to Surah 9. The point is that Khalifah recognized and was (appropriately) repulsed by the obvious example of shirk contained in them – as all Muslims should be.

Some Muslims may try to get around this problem by pointing out that the definite forms of these names are not used for Muhammad. While it is certainly true that shirk is immediately obvious and recognizable when the definite forms of attributive words for Allah are being used for creatures, something the Qur’an also does in various places, the fact is that since the specific phrase in question, raoofun raheemun, is established by Quranic usage to be specifically for Allah, it also constitutes shirk to associate anyone with Allah in this way. In addition to this, since the Qur'an never pairs these words together in their definite forms when speaking of Allah, it is hardly any objection to say that it does not speak of Muhammad after this fashion. The one and only way the words raoofun and raheemun are used together where they uniformly refer to Allah is the very way they are used in Surah 9:128 for Muhammad.

Muslims may also try to turn this on its head and say that this verse, Surah 9:128, proves that others besides Allah may appropriately be called “Most Kind, Most Merciful”, and that because of this it is not shirk to call Muhammad “Most Kind, Most Merciful”, but the fact is the Qur’an nowhere refers to others in this way and Muhammad alone is singled out and ascribed these divine attributes. It is logically fallacious to reason from the fact that Muhammad is called “Most Kind, Most Merciful” to the fact that others may be so called in order then to go back and say, “It is not shirk to call Muhammad ‘Most Kind, Most Merciful’ because others may also be called ‘Most Kind, Most Merciful’”.

Furthermore, any attempt to circumvent this by saying it is not shirk because Allah himself is calling Muhammad after his own names, would simply beg the question. If Allah condemns and abominates shirk, part and parcel of which means not associating anyone or anything with Allah in his divinity, such as by ascribing to someone else attributes and titles that belong to Allah alone, then why does Allah say of Muhammad in the Qur’an that which is otherwise only said about himself? Why is shirk not shirk when it is committed by Allah? In addition, if shirk is a valid criterion for determining if something is the truth from God, then the fact that Allah in the Qur’an supposedly endorses what can honestly only be called shirk is proof positive that the Allah of the Qur’an is not the true God and that the Qur’an is not the Word of God.

When Muslims accuse Christians of being guilty of shirk for their belief that Jesus is God, they do so because they believe Christians are guilty of worshipping a creature alongside of God, i.e. that Christians are guilty of ascribing to a creature the nature, names, attributes, prerogatives, honors and works that belong exclusively to deity. Ironically, since Christians do not believe they are applying such titles to a mere creature when they, following the Scriptures, apply such things to the Lord Jesus Christ, whom they believe to be the divine Word of God who became flesh (not a human being who became a god), it is actually Muslims who are guilty of this very thing. In calling Muhammad, whom the Qur’an elsewhere declares to be merely and only a man, by divine titles that are otherwise only used of Allah, i.e. titles that are used exclusively for him in derogation of all others, they are in fact guilty of deifying Muhammad, a creature.

As much as contemporary Muslims, contrary to Muslims of the past, may dislike the apostle Paul, his description of the difference between the clearly revealed truth about God that all nature testifies to on every side and all false religion that is rooted in sin-clouded speculation (or even demonic deception), strikingly applies not only to paganism in general but to Islam in particular: for those who adhere to the teachings of the Qur'an have “exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshipped and served created things rather than the Creator – who is forever praised. Amen.” (Romans 1:25)

This means the Qur’an is false not only when judged by the Bible but even when judged by its own criteria. In other words, according to the Bible and the Qur’an, Islam is a religion of shirk.

Further Reading: The Deification of Muhammad