The Myth of Islamic Purity, Part 1 (of 3)

Introduction:

Once upon a time there lived a man named Muhammad who claimed that his religion, the Islamic religion, was a perfect religion of absolute purity.

But is it really?
This article will attempt to make clear that no human being or religion has ever done as much harm to the well-being of humanity as has Muhammad bin Abdullah of Arabian fame and his barbaric cult of Islam.

To this day, Muslims still believe that Islam is a perfect religion and the only true religion on earth. In fact the Islamists, the “true believers”, must believe and respect everything that Muhammad said and did. Muslims must not only believe that Islam is the one and only true religion on earth, they must also believe that all other religions are grossly inaccurate and ultimately offensive to God. Muhammad certainly made many extreme and dangerous statements.

“Islamic Purity” is another one of the many idiotic myths commonly believed by Muslims. In reality, Islam is anything but pure and true. It is quite laughable to read through Muhammad’s murder manual, the unholy Quran, and notice how many times it claims the religion to be perfect and pure. The tall claim that Islam is a religion of truth and purity and a religion of peace and justice is preposterous. Such falsehoods could only be believed by the uninformed or the feeble-minded.

The Notion of Islamic Purity:
The Islamic “holy books” are filled with empty claims stating that Islam is a pure and true religion. For 1400 years, many well-meaning Muslims have dedicated their lives attempting to improve and advance Muhammad’s cult of death and destruction. It is high-time that Muslims take a good hard look at the life of Muhammad and the details of this sick man’s religion of fear and hatred. It is ridiculous that educated Muslims are still stubbornly refusing to acknowledge that the prophet of Islam was indeed a mad man.

Throughout the centuries, Muslims have invested enormous amounts of time and energy trying to improve, beautify and purify Muhammad’s religion. Yet despite all of their efforts, Islam has failed Muslims horribly. In the end, the cruel injustice of Sharia law is the bitter fruit that Islam has historically produced over and over again the devout and obedient followers of Muhammad. Muslims always end up killing each other and trying to conquer others.

One of Islam’s most common attempts to achieve “Islamic purity” is wudu (ablution). Performing wudu – the washing of various parts of the body over and over again before performing salat (Islamic rituals of prayer) – is surely one of the more ridiculous of Islam’s many outlandish rituals. Having to repeat the washing of specific parts of the body over and over again 5 times a day is obvious proof of Muhammad’s obsessive compulsive disorder and the complete control he had over the lives of his brainwashed band of seventh century bandits.

Another false image of Islamic purity is to be found in the elaborate works of art that decorate many mosques. These works are another testament to Muslim’s attempt to portray Islam as a religion of beauty and purity. Of course Muhammad would have forbidden such efforts and instead demanded that his followers wage jihad and collect the booty for him. Unfortunately for the misguided Mohammedans, no amount of adornment can cover up or make clean the dark heart in the chest of Islam. For in truth, Islam is overflowing with the worst kinds of evil. The Islamic religion, in many parts and taken on the whole, is an abomination worthy of being despised.

Since the day that Muhammad’s cruel cult sprung out of the Arabian Desert it has
destroyed countless number of humans with its horrific doctrines of intolerance and injustice. There are many ludicrous statements to be found in the Quran and Sunnah stating that Islam is a religion of purity. The only challenge is choosing which passages most effectively show Islam to be the laughable fraud that it is. Here are just a few samples taken from Mad Moe’s evil and fundamentally flawed religious cult:

Claims of Islamic purity:
The Quranic passage below is nonsense. The verse is filled with lies. First, the Quran was not revealed to Muhammad. The Quran is the creation of Muhammad’s madness and lies that he used to take whatever he wanted. Secondly, there is no such thing as Muhammad’s Islamic god Allah. What an insult to God if there actually is some sort of god! Thirdly, the Islamic religion is far from pure. The Islamic religion and its prophet are filthy, evil trash.

Quran, 039.002: Lo! We have revealed the Scripture unto thee (Muhammad) with truth; so worship Allah, making religion pure for Him (only).

The Quranic verse below is vary similar to the one above. The Quran is full of repetitious garbage. Again, the verse is pure lies. And again, as in the above verse, Muhammad claims that those are God’s words. Muhammad was insane and Islam is a pack of lies with a few good things thrown into it for the weaklings and the suckers to cling to. Such is the nature of a cult.

Quran, 039.011:Say (O Muhammad): Lo! I am commanded to worship Allah, making religion pure for Him (only).

Muslims must lie to themselves and others when they say that Islam is a pure and perfect religion. For example, for every good thing that Muhammad said about women, he said just as many bad things. Islam is full of contradictions, cruelty and gross injustice. Here are some of many disgusting and harmful things that Muhammad said about women:

002.222
They ask thee concerning women’s courses. Say: They are a hurt and a pollution: So keep away from women in their courses, and do not approach them until they are clean. But when they have purified themselves, ye may approach them in any manner, time, or place ordained for you by Allah. For Allah loves those who turn to Him constantly and He loves those who keep themselves pure and clean.

002.228
Your women are a tilth for you (to cultivate) so go to your tilth as ye will, and send (good deeds) before you for your souls, and fear Allah, and know that ye will (one day) meet Him. Give glad tidings to believers, (O Muhammad).

002.223
And women shall have rights similar to the rights against them, according to what is equitable; but men have a degree (of advantage) over them.

002.230
So if a husband divorces his wife (irrevocably), He cannot, after that, re-marry her until after she has married another husband and He has divorced her.

004.003
Marry women of your choice, Two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess (female sex slave), that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice.

* Of course the words “or (a captive) that your right hands possess” mean female sex slaves.

004.011
Allah (thus) directs you as regards your Children’s (Inheritance): to the male, a portion equal to that of two females:

004.024
Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess:

004.034
Men are in charge of women, because Allah has made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great.

Hadith, Sahih Bukhari,Volume 7, Book 62, Number 31: Narrated Ibn ‘Umar: Evil omen was mentioned before the Prophet: The Prophet said, “If there is evil omen in anything, it is in the house, the woman and the horse.”

Hadith, Sahih Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62, Number 122: Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “If a woman spends the night deserting her husband’s bed (does not sleep with him), then the angels send their curses on her till she comes back (to her husband).”

Hadith, Sahih Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 54, Number 460: Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “If a husband calls his wife to his bed (i.e. to have sexual relation) and she refuses and causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning.”

Hadith, Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 2, Number 28: Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas: The Prophet said: “I was shown the Hell-fire and that the majority of its dwellers were women who were ungrateful.” It was asked, “Do they disbelieve in Allah?” (or are they ungrateful to Allah?) He replied, “They are ungrateful to their husbands and are ungrateful for the favors and the good (charitable deeds) done to them. If you have always been good (benevolent) to one of them and then she sees something in you (not of her liking), she will say, ‘I have never received any good from you.”

Hadith: Sunan Abu Dawud, Book 11, No. 2142: Narrated Umar ibn al-kahttab:
The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife.

Conclusion:

Those Muslims’ that still believe Islam to be a pure and true religion are clearly suffering from “Islamic brain damage”.

Saleem Smith is a Canadian Ex-Muslim. He has his own site in which he expresses his views on Islam and other issues. Here is a LINK to his site.

Source: http://www.faithfreedom.org/articles/quran/the-myth-of-islamic-purity-part-1-of-3/


Follow please the next parts on Fraithfreedom.org
IHS

Billion Muslims Consider Mo a Prophet. That is a Miracle

Introduction

In history, many warlords and leaders robbed killed and raped and committed genocides but they were all condemned and declared evil criminals like Genghis Khan, Hitler and Polpot. Mo was the only war lord who did all that and is still declared a perfect human being. He was arguably not only the most violent man who ever lived but he was also a nut case who did such strange and abnormal things that if done by any one else will land him in a nut house . Yet a billion Muslims consider him a role model for humanity. Now that is a miracle ..

Let us see some of the things the role model did when he was not busy with robbing, killing and raping.

SLEPT WITH DEAD WOMEN

Whether this gesture was sexual in nature or not it is a nutty thing to lie down with a dead woman and think that it will give her a ticket to paradise. .

Hadith 34424 Kanezel omall. This is from a book called “Kanz Al Umal” (The Treasure of the Workers), in the chapter of “The issues of women”, authored by Ali Ibn Husam Aldin, commonly known as Al-Mutaki Al-Hindi. He based his book on the hadiths and sayings listed in “Al-Jami Al-Saghir,” written by Jalal ul-Din Al-Suyuti.

Narrated by Ibn Abbas: “I (Muhammad) put on her my shirt that she may wear the clothes of heaven, and I SLEPT with her in her coffin (grave) that I may lessen the pressure of the grave. She was the best of Allah’s creatures to me after Abu Talib”… The prophet was referring to Fatima , the mother of Ali.

SWAM IN FILTHY POND WITH DEAD DOGS
If you bathed in sewage water with fecal matter in it , will your wife let you come near her ? .Well our Prophet did just that it and not only his wives slept with him but wives of his disciples also came and slept with him

He had a strange theory that water cannot become dirty. He would go and swim in Budaah well in which people threw , garbage, dead animals , fecal matter and rags with menstrual blood in it. Not only that, after bathing in it he went to the mosque and lead prayer and all the Muslims prayed behind this stinking imam.. Nobody dared to speak up and criticize him or say that he stunk . They knew criticizing prophet was blasphemy punishable with death.

Here are some hadiths

Abu Dawood ,Book 1, Number 0066:Narrated AbuSa’id al-Khudri: The people asked the Messenger of Allah (peace_be_upon_him): Can we perform ablution out of the well of Buda’ah, which is a well into which menstrual clothes, dead dogs and stinking things were thrown? He replied: Water is pure and is not defiled by anything.

Abu Dawood,Book 1, Number 0067:Narrated AbuSa’id al-Khudri:I heard that the people asked the Prophet of Allah (peace_be_upon_him): Water is brought for you from the well of Buda’ah. It is a well in which dead dogs, menstrual clothes and excrement of people are thrown. The Messenger of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) replied: Verily water is pure and is not defiled by anything.


Tafsir Qurtubi, chapter vol 13, page 5. Prophet drank dirty water from Budaah well and performed wudu with it. (For other references to Prophet’s(PBUH) bathing, drinking and making wudu with the water from Budaah well with dead dogs, garbage and menstrual blood listen to the last part of the following debate between a Muslim scholar and a Christian Arab): http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7162436352561262986&hl=en

WALKED AROUND WITH LICE

Needless to say that a man who bathed in filthy water of Budaah well will not mind having lice in his beard and head.. Our prophet used to walk around and visit his disciples with lice falling off his beard and head. The embarrassed muslim women often tried to take care of his lice problem..

Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 87, Number 130:Allah’s Apostle used to visit Um Haram bint Milhan she was the wife of ‘Ubada bin As-Samit. One day the Prophet visited her and she provided him with food and started looking for lice in his head.

Abu Dawood Book 19, Number 3074: She was picking lice from the head of the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) while the wife of Uthman ibn Affan and the immigrant women were with him.

VISITED CEMETERIES IN THE MIDDLE OF NIGHT AND MADE WEIRD HAND SIGNALS

How many of us wake up in the middle of night and go to a grave yard alone without any rhyme or reason , stand there for a long time making hand signals. And if we did , will we be considered sane …

Muslim Book 004, Number 2127: ‘A’isha narrated this:: When it was my turn for Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) to spend the night with me, he turned his side, put on his mantle and took off his shoes and placed them near his feet, and spread the corner of his shawl on his bed and then lay down till he thought that I had gone to sleep. He took hold of his mantle slowly and put on the shoes slowly, and opened the door and went out and then closed it lightly. I covered my head, put on my veil and tightened my waist wrapper, and then went out following his steps till he reached Baqi (cemetery)’. He stood there and he stood for a long time. He then lifted his hands three times, and then returned.

PERFORMED ORAL SEX ON MENSTRUATING WOMEN

Liking oral sex is one thing but performing it on a menstruating woman and then falling asleep on top of her private parts , you have to be either crazy or addicted to menstrual blood.

Here is a hadith where Prophet asked his menstruating wife Aisha to open her thighs , then he put his head there and later fell asleep with his head between her thighs… The hadiths stopped short of saying that he performed oral sex on Aisha but it seems, that’s what he did. . Either Aisha was too embarrassed to mention it or the later embarrassed muslims removed that part from the sahih hadith..

Sunaan Abu Dawud: Book 1, Number 0270: Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu’minin: Aisha said “ One night Prophet of Allah entered (upon me) while I was menstruating He said: Come near me. I said: I am menstruating. He said: Uncover your thighs. I, therefore, uncovered both of my thighs. Then he put his cheek and chest on my thighs and I lent upon him until he became warm and slept.

It seems that he had also recited Quran before falling asleep.

Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 93, Number 639: Narrated ‘Aisha:The Prophet used to recite the Quran with his head in my lap while I used to be in my periods (having menses).

BLINDED PEEPING TOMS

Every one likes privacy. But you don’t pierce a sharp arrow into the eye of some one who peeps in your room.

Bukhari Volume 9, Book 83, Number 38a: Narrated Anas: A man peeped into one of the dwelling places of the Prophet. The Prophet got up and aimed a sharp-edged arrow head (or wooden stick) at him to poke him stealthily.

TOLD STRANGE FAIRY TALES

Mo used to tell ridiculous make believe fairy tales of meeting jinns, wrestling with them, tieing them to a mosque pillar, reciting quran to their gatherings etc etc. He said jinns eat bones and their horses eat dung. (he instructed muslims never to use bones to clean themselves after defecating). Every one call such a man loonie but muslims call him prophet and consider him holier than god.(South park drew cartoons of God and Jesus, it did not bother muslims , when they drew cartoon of Mo, they went beserk)

Here is such a story of Mo describing his quran recital to a gathering of bone eating jinns ( who were made of fire) who rode to the event on dung eating horses ..

Muslim, Book 004, Number 0903:Ibn Masud says “we were in the company of the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) one night and he went missing. We searched for him in the valleys and the hills. We thought he was secretly killed by somebody. We spent the worst night which people could ever spend. When it was dawn we saw him coming from the side of Hiri’. We said: Messenger of Allah, we missed you and searched for you, but we could not find you and we spent the worst night which people could ever spend. He (the Holy Prophet) said: A Jinn came to me to invite on behalf of a group of jinns and I went along with him and recited to them the Qur’an. Prophet then went along with us and showed us their traces and traces of their embers. They (the Jinn) asked him (the Holy Prophet) about their provision and he said: Every bone on which the name of Allah is recited is your provision. The time it will fall in your hand it would be covered with flesh, and the dung of (the camels) is fodder for your animals. The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: Don’t perform istinja (clean yourself) with these (things) for these are the food of your brothers (Jinn).

Source: http://www.faithfreedom.org/articles/op-ed/billion-muslims-consider-mo-a-prophet-that-is-a-miracle/

IHS

Koran Contains not a Hint at Peace

Editor’s Note: This is a worthy article written about eight years ago by a university professor who understood Islam too well

Moshe Sharon is an Arabic studies researcher. He is a professor of the Oriental studies department of the Jewish University in Jerusalem - When I asked my student, Armi Abu, who is in our chair, and by the way, a nephew of Arafat: “What kind of peace do you want?”, he promptly answered: “What kind of peace do you mean? What we mean is a temporary cease-fire”. This is the logical misunderstanding of the Oslo agreements and what these agreements mean at all. The Arab terminology differs greatly from what Europeans mean, – the professor goes on.

The Arab language has many nuances. To understand an Arab phrase one  has to understand the context and follow the intonation. Not everything you hear should be accepted as real. Most of our Israeli politicians are completely ignorant of understanding the outlook of our enemies, especially Palestinians. If the country’s policy is based on ignorance then it is worth nothing. This is the exact image of  Israeli policy towards Palestinians now.

With this shocking monologue by professor Moshe Sharon our conversation began. - Is it true that Muslims really want to rule the whole world? Isn’t it a terrifying prospect? - Unless we understand the culture of Muslims and how their outlook differs from ours, this idea itself will seem incredible. But we have to know – this is the basis of Islam. Both secular Arabs and Muslims, who are fundamentalists, pursue the same purposes which have the same roots called Islam.

The laws of Islam are built on two inviolable principles. They are Koran and “precedents”. The word “precedents” means the life and doings of Mohammed. Whatever Mohammed did is the rule for Muslims to follow. He, according to Islam, was faultless. That is why all generations follow the laws of Islam (sharia – in Arabic), which are based on two sources. On the one hand, it is Koran, on the other hand, it is Sunah, that is commentaries, which explain Koran’s directives. The laws of Islam are the corner stones of civil, government and
criminal codes. They are also the corner stones of Arab outlook, laws of Arab countries, as well as of laws on peace and war.

- Nevertheless, Israeli politicians think that Koran and Sunah are not the today’s reality.

- This is a mistake. Moreover, it is the mistake that gave ungrounded roots for the idea “to build a new Middle East…” We, Jews, are discussing this idea between ourselves. Our idea of “a new Middle  East” is a fruit, say, product of our imagination. It is torn off from reality and does not take into account the environment we live in. Shimon Peres wrote the book called “New Middle East”, in which he solely believes in his “message to descendants”. The book made a different impression on the Arab World. Some see in it another proof of Jew’s vicious intention to spread their ruling over the whole Arab world. The reaction towards the book was not adequate. Some say that, having heard about the book, President of Egypt Mubarak asked: “What shall we do with the old Middle East? Why don’t Jews like it?” There is some kind of jealousy in this question.

- Still, the Muslims are realists. They don’t try to seize what they are not able to now.

- Nevertheless that does not mean that they shouldn’t fight. On the contrary, Muslims should wage wars until Islam conquers the whole world. Here I want to stress that Arabs do not intend to convert all people into fanatic Muslims who are praying towards Mecca 5 times a day. There is no missionary in Islam. Their aim is to put the whole world under Islam and to recognize its superiority. They divide the world into two parts – “the house of war” and “the house of Islam”. The contemporary Muslim world is “the house of Islam”. They call the part, which they try to conquer, “the house of war”. Any territory, which in some historical period was under Muslims, is considered a Muslim land forever. Therefore, creation of State of Israel on the territory that once belonged to Muslims was a historic revolution for them. Muslims cannot accept this fact in principle. Nevertheless, they are still realistic politicians… They do not hurry. They are waiting. Their actions depend on the situation, on the difference of their military might and that of the enemy.

- Is there a slightest hope to conclude peace with Arabs?

- Not in the least. The long hand of Ishmael (ancestor of all Arabs) knows no other state than that of permanent war. This is jihad, the sacred war of Muslims against “infidels”. Jihad is a duty established by Koran.

- Still, there are cases when jihad was stopped, say, by Egypt when we concluded a peace treaty with it in Camp David.

- I regret to say but many people in Israel do not understand what such treaties are worth of. Islam does not envisage in principle any peace treaty with “infidels”. Real treaties are possible only between Muslims. The principle of commanded war is always in force and waits for the time and real chance to be realized. Even Anvar Sadat who put his signature under the “peace treaty” knew that he was signing only a temporary cease-fire agreement. But Sadat made a sin and broke the commandment when he publicly announced, “There will be no war any more. No bloodshed”, – and paid his life for that.

- Tell me then what is the reason for Arabs to conclude temporary cease-fire agreements?

- The situation in the world insistently demands contacts with “infidels”. Under “infidels’” pressure Arabs have to take some obligations. Europeans are expecting real peace. But the peace offered to them by Arabs has a short life.

- How do we know that Muslims will, by all means, break the treaty, which they have signed themselves?

- It is said in “the precedent” established by Mohammed. In 628 he signed a treaty with the Kureisha tribe known as the “khadivia treaty”. At that time Kureisha warriors were stronger than his. The treaty was for 10 years. But not even two years passed and Mohammed unleashed the war and seized Mecca. Kureisha people did believe in the oath and mutual obligations and felt themselves secure. However, the temporary cease-fire agreement had also additional purpose, that is to lullaby the enemy’s vigilance. When Mohammed struck and began to advance, the citizens of Mecca crawled to him on their knees. They pleaded for negotiations to resolve contradictions that made Mohammed to renew the war. But Mohammed ordered his security not to let the delegation of respectable people of Mecca come in. Mohammed spent two years of truce for preparing for a new war because he knew that the war was inevitable. He knew about it when he was singing the peace treaty. He violated the treaty at the suitable for him moment. This is how the notion of hudna (cease-fire between enemies) was established in Islam. Muslims never sign armistice for a long and indefinite period of time. One of the main rules for them is to set the validity period of such an agreement. When Muslims feel that they are strong enough to resume the war, they should cancel the armistice. If they feel not strong enough to resume the war, they are allowed to automatically prolong the validity period of the treaty for 10 years, and not necessarily to negotiate with the opposite party about it.

- As I remember, Arafat spoke about the possibility of building a secular Palestinian state.

- His words mean nothing. Immediately after singing the agreement in Oslo he made a speech in the Johannesburg mosque (South Africa), in which he outlined his political intentions. He said that he understands peace as Islam means it. Then he resorted to the lessons from Arab history. We have to know that when an Arab leader resorts to history he means the present principles and situation because there is no such notion as “ancient” in Islam. Islam is a culture of life, the present way of life. Islam is the past that becomes the present and shows the way to the future.

Arafat publicly said that in Oslo he meant a temporary cease-fire (hudna). When he was saying this he knew he would be understood in the right way. Unfortunately, few people paid a serious attention to these words. They were addressed to those who knew “the course of events”. My friends and I tried to persuade others that Arafat’s words were a code and we had to understand the clandestine meaning of his speech. However, Israeli leaders didn’t want to listen to our advice. Jews were dreaming about peace at that time through the prophecy of Yeshayagu: “and swords will be beaten into ploughshares”. By the way, they’re some interesting facts about the treaty with Egypt. After it had been signed, a festive party was organized and President Carter made a public speech. In his speech he decided to use quotations about peace from books of the three religions. It was not difficult to find quotations on peace in Tanakha and he took those that could sound Christian. However, the President’s advisers could not find an appeal to peace in Koran. The thing is that there are no peace appeals in Koran.

- So, does it mean that Arabs’ peace assurances are a thumping lie?

- There is an Arab proverb: “Words are tax free”. We have to learn to negotiate from Palestinians. They follow the example of a Muslim caliph Ali who negotiated with the rebelled ruler of Damascus when each side was not able to gain victory…The caliph’s representative suggested that the enemy should speak first. He wanted to know the enemy’s plans before making his own decision. The enemy spoke first and step-by-step disclosed everything he had in mind. The caliph’s representative was listening attentively and assenting to him occasionally. After the meeting was over, the Damascus representative in his summarizing speech said that the caliph’s representative agreed that Damascus should receive independence. His opponent stopped him and said, “I have never agreed to this”. This classic example should teach us not to make proposals. We have to make the opponent disclose his position. When the opponent knows what your interests are, their costs immediately go up. When Begin started negotiating I told him, “Do not come out with proposals. Let them speak out.” But even Begin was not ready to understand and accept this. There were negotiations with Palestinians in 1996. Peres was negotiating with Arafat. Peres was very pleased with the talks and said after the meeting, ” They agree with all Israeli proposals. To each proposal they were approvingly nodding their heads”. Exactly like caliph Ali’s representative did…

- Tell me, do Arabs mean real war when they speak about jihad?

- Those who support Muslims try to represent this notion like it looks in the West. They say it is a “struggle” for Muslims’ interests. It is not true. This is a bloody war to the final victory until the enemy surrenders to Islam.

Traditional Muslim books say that Islam will take over the world but only after Muslims defeat and destroy Jews. These books also say that Jews will hide themselves behind trees and rocks. But the time comes and one “great day” the rocks and trees will start shouting: ” Hey, Muslim, there is a Jew behind me! Come and kill him!” Only one tree will keep silence. In Islamic it is called “el oseg” (the tree of Jews). I mean the tree of sne (a bush from which God appeared before Moshe). This tree is mentioned in Muslim books for Muslims not to forget to look for Jews even behind this tree. These books are studied in all Arab schools, and political leaders make quotations from them in their speeches.

- What do we have to do then?

- Our task is to make Arabs disarm and sign a cease-fire treaty for a long term.

- How can we achieve this if any treaty for Arabs is rather conventional?

- There should be a reason for Islam to abandon the idea of war. The reason can be our military supremacy over them. For example, in 1229, Sultan El Melek El Kamal from Egypt handed Jerusalem, which had been under Muslims since the rule of Saladin, over to the Christian king Fredrik the Great, because the latter made the whole world fear him…

Israel’s policy is weak and, thus, leaves no choice for Palestinians. Under this condition they simply must fight with us. Until now they have no military might to oppose Israel, that’s why they try to weaken the Jewish state.

If we become much stronger than them, they will have to postpone jihad again and again. They should feel our might; they should feel they can’t defeat us. Only then they will disarm even if the terms are not favourable for them.

http://www.faithfreedom.org/articles/quran/koran-contains-not-a-hint-at-peace/


IHS