Tuesday, 23 April 2019

Correspondence With A Muslimah


By Dallas M. Roark, Ph.D

From: Zizi Y
To: dialog...@answering-islam.de
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 10:12 AM
Subject: Oh, Sons and Daughters of Adam and Eve!
Dear Zizi:
Thanks for your letter.  It is not good to start a letter by insulting the receiver.  But I forgive you.

She wrote: I read half-way through your article below [which she did not identify] and skimmed the rest. It is grammatically well written, good on you :) Unfortunately, it does not merit much more than that.  Can you please point out where in the Qur'an does it say that men and women will have their reproductive organs (naughty bits) in the hereafter?  I will genuinely apologise to you if you find any passage in the Qur'an that says that Men and Women will have sexual relations in Paradise.

Reply: Your question is the type of question that is known to be impossible from the beginning.   This is like asking if computers are mentioned in the Qur’an. Apart from genitals, the Qur’an certainly does mention the idea of sexual intercourse in paradise. 

"Thus (shall it be), and We will wed them with Houris, pure, beautiful ones." (The Evident Smoke, 44:54 Shakir.)   … They shall recline on couches lined with thick brocade, and within reach will hang the fruits of both gardens. … Therein are bashful virgins whom neither man nor jinnee will have touched (opening their hymens with sexual intercourse) before. … Virgins as fair as corals and rubies…. (The Beneficent, 55:54-58 Dawood)  In each there shall be virgins chaste and fair. … Dark eyed virgins sheltered in their tents whom neither man nor jinnee would have touched before. They shall recline on green cushions and fine carpets. … (The Beneficent 55:70-77 Dawood)  We created the Houris and made them virgins, loving companions for those of the right hand… That Which is Coming, (56:36 Dawood)   As for the righteous, they shall surely triumph. Theirs shall be gardens and vineyards, and high-bosomed virgins for companions: a truly overflowing cup. (The Tidings, 78:31-33 Dawood; also reference 52:20, 56:22-24) 

Where do the jihadists get the idea of 72 virgins daily in paradise?  Where else than Islam?   Having 72 virgins is not for house cleaning. Why do you think so many unmarried or married jihadists are willing to die so quickly and so irrationally for paradise if it were not for lots of sex? 

She wrote:  Being a female, if I'm not going to have sex, why would I care if a man gets a houri for a companion?! 

My reply: Why are you not going to have sex?  There are several possibilities.  Mohammed said that most women will be in hell. Another reason is that women are second class persons and their pleasures are irrelevant as proven by female circumcision of millions of girls. 

She wrote: Or why would even a man care for that matter? The only reason why I would care is if I was a sexually perverted person who lived for their own desires and passions? What you're saying is that I should become a Christian and worship God because I know He has guaranteed a male-angel for me in Heaven (if there was such an offer)... and that should be my main motivation to go to Heaven. I think if you are a Christian and want never-ending sexual activity with men other than your husband in Heaven, then you are going there for all the wrong reasons. 

My reply:   Sorry, there are no male angels for you or anyone.  Jesus said that in heaven they neither marry nor are given in marriage. The jihadists are going to be hugely disappointed. It was for nothing that they died.  Sex is a temporary creation for procreation, and there will be no babies in heaven.

She wrote:  Besides, we can't exactly justify and explain what goes on in Heaven while we are still on planet Earth, right? It is like saying Disneyland sucks when, really, you never went because you were denied entry. And since neither you nor I have visited Heaven, yet, and come back to recount our own version, we have no choice but trust in what our God has ordered and designed for us. For now, let us concentrate on how to get there, shall we? 

My reply:  If you would read the Gospels you will discover that Jesus came from heaven to earth and after the resurrection he returned to heaven. He does say something about heaven. So what I believe about heaven is what He said about it.  

She wrote:  Another thing... put aside your prejudice and ponder on this...

My reply: I would ask the same of you in asking you to read the Gospels.

She wrote:  "The Qur'an is the truth because it does NOT deny Prophet Jesus (pbuh) and his second coming, to do so would be a sin against God.

My reply: There is a grave problem in your reasoning here. The Qur’an denies the really important issues about Jesus.  Mohammed denied that Jesus was the Son of God, that he was crucified, and that he arose from the dead.  If you will read the Gospels you will see that these are central truths.   In denying them, the Qur’an does not give you truth.  Moreover, the Qur’an incorporates myths, non-historical stories, bad science, wrong medicine, and other stuff.  So, to affirm that Jesus was a prophet does not give the whole truth.

She wrote: “In fact, Prophet Muhammad details Jesus' second coming in the Hadith and labels him as the Saviour of Mankind against the wicked Dajjal.”

My reply:  There are over 500,000 hadiths and only about 2400 are regarded as credible by Muslim scholars.  How do you pick and choose? If they are overwhelmingly false, how can you trust the ones you regard as truth? 

She wrote:   “When a Christian says God, Muslims understands that you refer to the one and only God, Creator of All, for which the Arabic name is Allah. Yet when a Muslim says Allah, narrow-minded Christians will mimick the name as though we worship a different or lesser God!

My reply:     There were 360 gods in Mecca when Mohammed lived there.  He kept only one  god. If Allah is one among others it is not possible that he can become supreme.  A  god has to be supreme to begin with,  a being cannot gain supremacy.  If Allah were supreme to begin with,  why were 359 gods worshiped?   If you read the Old Testament Yahweh would not allow his name to be associated with other gods that were worshiped.  The reason for the judgement on Israel was their trying to make  Yahweh a functional god and Baal an agricultural god.  Yahweh forbade it all and allowed the Jews to be carried into captivity. 

If you will read through the Old Testament it is a stretch of the imagination to think that Yahweh and Allah  have the same character.   Allah is capricious,  Yahweh is not.  Christians believe that God truly revealed Himself in the Incarnation in Jesus.   Allah  did not do that and Muslims deny that God was in Christ  reconciling the world to Himself.  

She wrote: “Since the bible was not written by Jesus himself to attest to this; why do Christians insist that God takes the humanly form? If Jesus was in fact recreated in the image of God, tell me who on Earth saw God Almighty and brang back to Earth a sketch of Him?!  Also, I believe the photo camera was invented centuries after Jesus. Putting up a picture of a man and declaring that he is Jesus or He is God, is bordering idolatry. Think on it. 

My reply:  Let’s do some thinking together.  You need to read the Gospels to get the story straight.  The Son of God took human form in the person of Jesus of Nazareth. Why? We could not know God any other way. Do you know Allah? Do you have a relationship with Allah? Does Allah answer your prayers? You can pray to Jesus to confirm the truth of the Gospel to you.  If you are searching for the truth, he said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life, no one comes to the Father except through me.” (John 14:6) 

The story of Jesus is that God loves you so much that He came to earth in the person of the Son of God to die for you, rise from the dead, to forgive your sins, to give you the Holy Spirit, to give you the promise of everlasting life in His presence.  (Remember, no marriage in heaven.)

She wrote:  Besides, don't tell me that Christians are THAT narrow-minded that they are not able to grasp the possibility, the concept that no-one knows exactly what God looks like, and that His beauty is beyond human comprehension and He is unlike anything on this earth, including us humans? Why do you insist on flattering yourself so?

My reply: Why do you insist on insulting God’s love? The only way that we can know about God is for God to reveal Himself. This is what the Gospel is about. God, the unknowable, reveals Himself in a knowable way as the Son of God.  If you want to know what God is like, read the story of Jesus.

She wrote:  “Since you yourself admit to appreciating the recountation of certain historical facts in the Qur'an as being 'accurate', consider this theory, for just a second, God is nothing like us humans, right? Just consider it. Now, find the passage, as I'm sure you'll have no trouble, where it says: 'GOD is One, the Eternal God. He begot none, nor was He begotten. None is equal to Him'.

My reply:    “recountation of certain historical facts as accurate?? There are lots of inaccuracies in the Qur’an.   The passage you mentioned is:
 
 “In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful. Say: He is Allah, the One!  Allah, the eternally Besought of all!  He begetteth not nor was begotten. And there is none comparable unto Him.” (112:1-4, Pickthall)

The problem with this passage is that Mohammed did not understand the Christian idea of God’s only begotten Son.  This was not a sexual begetting but a way of talking about God becoming Incarnate in Jesus.

She wrote:  (Please email me the passage number and I'll tell you if its right). Now consider this passage:   

"She who guarded her virginity, we breathed into her of our spirit and appointed her and her Son to be a sign to the worlds" (Sura al-Anbiya' 21:91).  

We both know, who that is; Mary and her Son Jesus. If you do not trust God to breath unto Mary, and from a single breath create a Messiah, then who is the unbeliever?

You or Me? Or must you relate and think only in terms of things that you see on this Earth with your own eyes? You reduce Him to a human being, like yourself, with a son, like your own, but of course you acknowledge He has supernatural powers. If so, then change the Bible, and replace 'God' with Sorcerer!

My reply:  You are the unbeliever because you reject Jesus as the Word, the Son of God. The Word was made flesh and dwelt among us and we beheld his glory. (John 1:14)  In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God. (John 1:1-2)

Your comment does not make sense to me since you are really the one reducing Him to a mere human being, a prophet. I worship Him as the Son of God. You claim to honor Jesus but you want to call him a Sorcerer because he did miracles.  There are many, many miracles in the Gospels and they show his power to heal, to forgive, to give life to the dead, and they proclaim his person.   Even the Qur’an declares that Jesus did miracles and it does not make him a sorcerer.

She wrote:  “It is the logic to learn from your errors in the past. We would not want to step backward when progression is the natural order of things.

This leads me to my next point, if I were given the opportunity to be transported back to an era where women were burnt at the stake because they were thought to be witches, when, really they were in fact herbalists... would I go? No. I most definitely would not!

Would we ever go back to witch-hunting or witch-burning? No, we wouldn't. The very idea is preposterous! Why? Because, we have learned from our mistakes, so to speak, we no longer fear women who practice in naturopathy! It was only the fear of the unkown that fed the ignorance of the Christians who committed those terrible crimes against those women.

So, why do Christians exempt this logic to moving forward and progessing onto Islam? Why does progression into the future not apply to religion? Would i go back to using a type-writer? Would a German re-enact the Holocaust again? If we wanted to get there real fast would we journey to the other side of the earth with a ship? Think about it, Islam is Christianity but accurate, richer and better, the Qur'an: unspoiled by human hands.

My reply:  Where have you been in the Muslim world? Islam wants to return to the 7th century and the jihadists are trying to get you there.  Islam has not made progress.  It is still calling for death to the infidels, it is still justifying honor killing of women for whatever reason, and there are thousands of them going on all the time.  Islam supports the circumcision of young girls so that they will never know sexual pleasure, Islam still supports the second class position of women, less education and in some places, no education, little or no freedom for women and when all is said and done, according to Mohammed, they will end up in hell. This is progress? This is progressive?   Unspoiled by human hands?

You should check out some websites like http://www.exmuslim.com/, where Ex-Muslims tell why they left Islam, they are on videos.   Also check out the following. http://bibleprobe.com/islamapostates.htm, http://www.faithfreedom.org/Testimonials/ali1940.htm.   You can then decide if Islam is the religion of progression.

She wrote:  “Are you scared of Islam, Mr Roark? Can I liken your line of work to modern-day passive witch-hunting?”

My reply:  People need to know about the issues in Islam.  If you would read the history of Islam it is the story of death, destruction, and dhimmitude. Millions have died at the hands of Islam.  Muslims remember the Crusades  which were a drop in the bucket in comparison to the killing and enslavement of the people who were conquered by Islam.  Islam is a great threat to freedom, progress, and safety. 

She wrote:  Where it says in the Bible to abstain from pre-marital affairs, so-called Christians and the Church are willing to compromise on that, prepared to be lenient on that, to forgive. Exactly, who gave the Church and priests authority to absorb/absolve humans of their sins? Just think; a human forgiving a human for a law created by God. I'll explain in terms you'll understand. We all agree that God gave us life, and only God can take life away... Now I will rephrase: God made the laws and only God can nullify the law. I hope that helps. Please, let's not forget sam-sex marriages...

My reply:  When a Christian sins, that does not abrogate the command against fornication, and adultery. Now what to do? Is there any forgiveness? Jesus was surrounded by men accusing a women caught in adultery.  He said that any man without sin could cast the first stone.  Little by little they left here, and He said, Go and sin no more. (John 8:1-11)   By contrast, in Islam a woman, or girl suspected of talking with a man, a stranger, or a boy friend may be killed as part of honor killing. Young girls are killed by their parents on the suspicious of sexual activity have been shown to be innocent by medical examinations. There are thousands of these that go on every year.   Jesus said, if you do not forgive, neither will your heavenly Father forgive you.   Check out the Gospels, you will be surprised at what you discover. 

She wrote:  “PS. Do you know that a report on Purity Pledges in America, found that 9 out of 10 young girls who swore a Christian Oath to God and pledged to their fathers to remain virgins until they married, broke their Oath to God and had sex... Next time you decide to discredit the Qur'an, think of this fact.”

My reply: You are talking apples and oranges. The fact that young girls break their pledge does not make the Gospel false, nor the Qur’an true. I also have sorrow over young people sinning against God and their own bodies. It is also sad to know that in Islamic cultures honor and shame are so strong that girls are killed for little reason, suspected actions, and normal actions.

She wrote:  “Perhaps, it will be a reminder of how loyal Christians are... and perhaps it is because of this demonstrated loyalty that you do this as a hobby. Otherwise, God forbid, one would think that you spend your time trying to discredit the Qur'an and Islam out of fear and anxiety!” 

My reply:  The issue is truth.  The love of God is more important that fear and anxiety.  Perfect love casts out fear.  Remember God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, loves you.  He came to let you know that.  You will not hear that Allah loves you because you cannot know him, but you can know Jesus, God in the flesh, and have a personal relationship with him NOW.   Simply pray, asking Him to show you Who He is.  Blessings.  Dallas 

http://answering-islam.org/authors/roark/letter2.html

Correspondence With A Muslim

I received an email  some time ago from a Muslim responding in general to my articles and this was my answer to him. There are some items in his note that make no sense to me and the purpose of the letter in the beginning is not clear to me.   Nevertheless, it will give you some idea of the thinking of the person as well as my responses.

He wrote: CHRISTIAN SAHADA FORMULA Acknowledging Muhammad SAW as the Messenger of God is a very sensitive case for Christians. And, of course, acknowledging that Jesus as the Son of God is a very sensitive case for Muslims. If Christians want to acknowledge that Muhammad SAW is the Messenger of God, then they want to be convinced about it, first.

1. Christian Sahada.

I am launching this Christian Sahada: As you know, Islam uses Sahada to clarify that someone has already accepted Islam. It sounds in English as: I acknowledge that there is no god but God. And I acknowledge that Muhammad is the Messenger of God.

By vowing this, a person legally, formally, officially, embraces Islam, and becomes Muslim. Sahada is the first step and the 1st rite that one must go thru before he becomes a complete Muslim. Thus, what is the Christian Sahada? Sound like: "I declare that Jesus is son of God, and Paul is the Primary Apostle"? Little no big No. Not al all! Here I am launching you the Christian Sahada, which consists of two statements.

Christian Sahada Statement I:

All Christians believe that Jesus is the son of God. They are conditioned by the Christian life to get used to think and to react as if Jesus was son of God. All Christian leaders claim that the sonship of Jesus is clearly written in Holy Bible, NT-OT. Even, according to Bible, Jesus himself claims that he is the son of God.

The question is: how trustworthy the Bible (NT-OT) is? Your society says: that trustworthy!! How convincing!

Understand this with all your heart and soul:

First there is Judaism, and Judaic community. To that community, God sends down Jesus. The coming of Jesus is not as smooth as God plans. The coming of Jesus breaks the Judaic community in 2: those who believe that Jesus is sent by Above, and those who deny Jesus. Jesus himself in his life detects that Judaic priests corrupt all the Scriptures; therefore God sends Jesus down to fix the Scriptures. After years of Jesus life, Judaic people crucify Jesus. And still Jesus can't fix the Scriptures even after the day of his crucifixion. Even though the coming of Jesus creates new religion, Christianity, but the Judaism still lives on with its corrupted Scriptures, according to what Jesus detects. What you have to learn and analyse in here? 

My response: You are forgetting and omitting so much in your assertions.  You are also falsely describing them.  You are also diverting attention from one issue to another one.

First, Christians believe that Jesus is the Son of God because there is evidence for it, not because they have been conditioned that way.   If you think only in terms of conditioning, how many Muslims would flee the Muslim culture if they were free to do so?   Many are there not because of serious belief and evidence, but because of conditioning and the culture.

Your second comment about “society says that the Bible is trustworthy.”  I am afraid that you do not understand Western society.  There are lots of pagans in America who would reject your comment. We have atheists and very liberal people who reject the Bible.

Your comment “the coming of Jesus is not as smooth as God plans” is based on a misunderstanding of the Bible.   I don’t think you have really read the Bible.  Your comments seem like normal Muslim propaganda.  If you would read Isaiah 53 you would know the death of the Messiah was prophesied 800 years before the coming of the Messiah.  So it can’t be a surprise to God. That was a part of his plan.

He wrote: You said, Jesus himself in his life detects that Judaic priests corrupt all the Scriptures; therefore God sends Jesus down to fix the Scriptures.”

My response: I don’t think you have read my statements correctly.   I would never affirm that the priests, nor the Pharisees, nor Jews in general ever corrupted the Scriptures.  Neither would I have stated that “God sends Jesus down to fix the Scriptures.”    I do not know which article you have referred to in this statement for it seems  way out of my belief system.

Again, you have a lack of understanding on the issue.  The Scriptures were not corrupt.  Jesus did not say they were corrupt.  He declared that they testified concerning Him.   The Dead Sea Scrolls turned up a complete scroll of Isaiah, for example, that is dated 100 BC and it is the same as the later scrolls.  Jesus’ charge against the Jews was that their oral traditions of interpretations were man made.

The Hebrew Scriptures have not changed.  It is a phony charge to claim that they have and you should be honest enough to acknowledge that.   The idea that the Bible was corrupted arose in Islam after Muslim scholars could not find Mohammed prophesied in the Scriptures.

Moreover, Jesus did not come to “correct the Scriptures” as you claim.  He came to die, establish a New Covenant (Jeremiah 31:31), and reveal the real nature of God’s love.

In an article "The Charge of Distortion of Jewish and Christian Scriptures" by Abdullah Saeed [Muslim World; Fall 2002, Vol. 92, Issue 3/4, p. 419], he wrote,
 
 “Since the "authorized" scriptures of Jews and Christians remain very much today as they existed at the time of the Prophet, it is difficult to argue that the Qur'anic references to Tawrat and Injil were only to the "pure" Tawrat and Injil as existed at the time of Moses and Jesus, respectively. If the texts have remained more or less as they were in the seventh century CE, the reverence the Qur'an has shown them at the time should be retained even today. Many interpreters of the Qur'an, from Tabari to Razi to Ibn Taymiyya and even Qutb, appear to be inclined to share this view. The wholesale dismissive attitude held by many Muslims in the modern period towards the scriptures of Judaism and Christianity do not seem have the support of either the Qur'an or the major figures of tafsir.”

He wrote: First, sending Jesus down to Judaic community and that Jesus detects that Scriptures are all corrupted -by Judaic priests / agents- means that God and Jesus himself admit, acknowledge that Israel is all depraved! Jesus finds Scriptures corrupted! It means, Israel modifies, twists and tortures Scriptures. If you believe in Jesus, then you got to believe in what Jesus detects: the corruption. Further more: the depravity of Israel.

My response: Your logic is twisted.  Because some Jews rejected Jesus that makes them depraved?  By the same reason, Muslims who reject Jesus as the Son of God are depraved.  Mohammed rejected Jesus as the Son of God and therefore he was depraved.  Is that the kind of logic you want?  What about all the people in Mecca who rejected Mohammed?  That makes him depraved?   How did Mohammed deal with the Meccans?  He returned with a force of warriors and forced himself on the city.

He wrote: Secondly, the community of Judaic breaks in 2: half denies Jesus, another acknowledges Jesus. How could this be? I mean, if indeed the coming of Jesus is already written, foretold, forecast in Scriptures, why all the priests and all Judaic community refuse Jesus? Isn't that mean that in Scriptures, there is never a single line that foretells that someone by the name Jesus is coming? In this case, Christians stress that Israel erase the line foretelling the coming of Jesus. But Judaic community stress that the followers of Jesus make this up. The question is: who is right? The followers of Jesus, or Judaic people who deny Jesus? Let me answer this: both are mistaken. The problem lies in: the depravity of Israel. Once the Israel is depraved, then forever all products / materials brought, kept by them are all questioned and even dangerous. Further: Christians accuse that Judaism is false. Jews accuse that Christian is false. Which one is right? As you know, both Christian and Judaism are born in the same cradle, in the same quality of people. Answer is: both are false! Case closed!

My Response: You have a conspiracy theory about Jews and Christians that is simply off the wall. No Christian has ever said that the Jews erased a line of Scripture.  There are many prophecies in the Old Testament about the coming Messiah.  He is not named specifically, but he is named in terms of character, “his name shall be called Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.”  Isaiah 9:6.    Jesus claimed to be all of this.    If you would read the New Testament you would see all of this.

You are wrong in your commentary.  You do not separate out the Old Testament Scriptures from the Oral tradition that was built up by the Pharisees and others.  Jesus himself declared the Old Testament Scriptures truthful.  Do you want to call Jesus a liar?  He condemned the Oral tradition but He said search the scriptures for they testify of me.  Judaism was true as far as it went, but there were those Jews who did not acknowledge Him as Messiah. How could Jesus claim the Scripture testified to Him if they were corrupted?  Remember the first Christians were Jewish believers who accepted Him as Messiah and Savior. Remember also that the apostles quoted the Old Testament many times in a similar fashion that Jesus did.

He wrote: Third, in his life, Jesus in a sermon on a hill to Israel, states this: Israel! Your forefathers murdered all (ancient) prophets. And you! If you are not those murderers, so you are the descendants of those murderers...What is that mean? Jesus himself acknowledges that Israel is depraved. The sermon of Jesus is bottom-lining some fact for the whole world that Israel is not a subject to believe in. I mean, if you believe in Jesus, so you got to believe that (a) Israel is depraved. That depraved so all ancient prophets are murdered by them, and their books are corrupted by them. (b) All materials brought by them are not subject to believe in. (c) further more: Jesus wants you to be careful, even to feel suspicion on Israel. If what I write you this makes you pissed-off (because in Christian life, Israel is positioned as the honour congregation), one thing you have to remember: what Jesus warns you on a hill one day? Jesus gives you no reason to extol Israel.     

My Response:  What kind of reasoning is this?  Because some prophets were killed all the rest are to be regarded as depraved?  If we apply the same reasoning to Muslim history we can conclude the same.  For example, when Muslims invaded India 300,000 Indian men were slaughtered because they did not know what to do with prisoners.  Over 60 million Christians were slain in the conquest of Christian North Africa, 80 million Hindus were slain in the invasion of India, 10 million Buddhists were killed along the silk route, in Africa over 120 million have died due to Jihad,  and  this means about 270 million people were killed in the last 1400 years and is still going on.  Now given your logic, Muslims are depraved, all Muslim materials are false, and we should be suspicious of all Muslims.  Therefore Muslims give us no reason to be respected.   Muslims are always depraved.   Is this your logic?  Go here for the stats.

He wrote: Fourth, if you insist that Israel is not depraved, or there is nothing happens in the way of heaven, then there ain't got to be Judaism and Christian side by side under the sky! If Judaic community / Israel are honest, then the coming of Jesus would be the ending days for Judaism. The fact differs. They keep the Judaism and all Judaic practices alive as if Jesus was telling lies. I want you to answer this: is it that Jesus who tells lies, or Jews who hide the truth? If you can't answer that (and of course -and I believe- you can't answer that), at least you know the problem and the situation, the background. There is one major bottom-line Jesus gives you: Jesus himself never trusts Israel / Judaic anymore! And if Jesus never trusts Judaic people, so why do you believe in them? Jesus is the best example for you, in this case.

My Response: I would suggest that you get better information on this issue by reading the book of Romans, chapter 9-11, “I say then, Did God cast off his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.   God did not cast off his people which he foreknew.” (Rom. 11:1-2)  Your conclusion at the end of your paragraph raises the same kind of question as above. First, to say that Jesus never trusts Jews is an error. Jesus loves not only the Jews, but He also loves you.  Why should one hold grudges against a people for what their fathers did?  This is one of the problems of the Muslim community: there is no forgiveness, only revenge.   Jesus taught forgiveness, even on the Cross when he was crucified he prayed, “Father, forgive them....”  If Muslims would so this, there would be no blood revenge.

Can you prove that Jesus lied? What is the evidence? What about the fact that Mohammed indicated one could lie and deceive others for purposes of war, and killing?

Note the following:  Narrated Jabir bin 'Abdullah:  Allah's Apostle said, "Who is willing to kill Ka'b bin Al-Ashraf who has hurt Allah and His Apostle?" Thereupon Muhammad bin Maslama got up saying, "O Allah's Apostle! Would you like that I kill him?" The Prophet said, "Yes," Muhammad bin Maslama said, "Then allow me to say a (false) thing (i.e. to deceive Kab)." The Prophet said, "You may say it." ... (Sahih al-Bukhari 5.369)

He wrote: Fifth, not long time after Jesus' sermon that stresses the depravity of Israel, Jesus is captured, arrested, tortured, crucified and murdered on a cross as if Jesus was a crime. All what Jesus warns, happens to himself. It means, the sermon of Jesus affects nothing to Israel. There is nothing to do for anyone -even Jesus- to change the morality of Israel. You all Christians, instead of understanding that the crucifixion of Jesus is the clear sign that Israel (and all Israel materials) is not subject to believe in, believe that the crucifixion is a sign of the advent of new religion and new salvation. How come? How pity? How ironic! What kind of religion that is in the cradle of the l.i.a.r.s? Of the depraved? You all Christians must see the Jesus crucifixion as the summit of the depravity of Israel. Not as the rising of new religion. The depravity of Israel that causes Jesus crucified gives a birth to a new religion?

My Response: You have made sweeping statements that are incorrect.   First, God foretold what would happen to the Messiah, Isaiah 53 as an example.  Second, thousands of Jews believed the Gospel, the Good news about the resurrection and they carried the message of hope and forgiveness to other Jews scattered in various parts of the Roman Empire, and that message spilled over to the non-Jews, the Gentiles.  God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself.  The incorporation of the Gentiles was also foretold in the Old Testament.  Third, your reasoning also can reflect on Mohammed.  Was he a liar?   Did he deceive people in claiming a revelation?

I would hope your comments about Jesus being crucified and about the resurrection are true for you in spite of the fact that the Qur’an denies it. What do you really agree with, the Qur’an or the New Testament?

He wrote: Sixth, most of all about the crucifixion, this is not just the leaders of Israel who decide (based on their depravity) the crucifixion, but all entire nation of Israel is so enthusiasm for Jesus crucifixion. None of them who feel sorry for Jesus crucified (except a little few; those who are in the inner circle of Jesus life: his mother, family, his followers). It strongly brings you and all bodies a clear clue and hint to understand how depraved entire Israel is!

My Reponse: How can you say that it was the entire nation?  The whole nation was not in Jerusalem when he was crucified!  You are condemning a whole people because of the actions of the leaders. Your wholesale condemnation of the Jewish people comes out of the influence of the Qur’an on your thinking.  If you compare the number of Jews who have won Nobel prizes in the sciences with the number of Muslims who have won these prizes you will see the promise to Abraham coming true.... “I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and be thou a blessing;  and I will bless them that bless thee, and him that curseth thee will I curse: and in thee shall all the families of the earth be blessed.” (Gen. 12:2-3)

You have been blessed by the Jewish people even though you don’t want to acknowledge it.

Your reasoning is misguided.  Mohammed is responsible for the killing of a whole tribe of Jewish men, and selling the rest into slavery.  On your reasoning one should say that all Muslims are depraved because of this.  I would hope you would reject such sweeping generalizations, not only for Muslims but also for everyone else including Jews.

He wrote: Seventh, in the movie Ten Commandment, the screen shows us the depravity of Israel. After they are rescued by God from Egyptian bondage and from the Red Sea, they create and worship another idol just when Moses is away to meet God for Ten Commandments. What is that mean? Israel is so depraved! How could books of them be reliable to believe in?

My Response: First, don’t use movies for your understanding of Jewish or Christian history. Hollywood is interested in making money, not converts.   Have you ever done anything contrary to Muslim beliefs?  The Jews were recently liberated from slavery.  They were on their way to learning about God and what it all means.   Now, not all the people turned to idolatry.  God’s judgement came on them but He did not give up on them because of his promise to Abraham.  The books are reliable because they tell the truth, they don’t whitewash it.  If you will read the Old Testament story you will discover that Hollywood did not stick to the script of the Bible.

He wrote: Eight, Jesus captured, tortured, and chained for crucifixion. In jail, there is another crime names Barabas. According to Israel tradition, if there are two crimes to be crucified, then both can't be crucified, only one can. So, the court will have the people to vote, which crime is to be crucified. The people vote for Jesus to be crucified, and vote Barabas to be released. Jesus? The teacher of morality? The one who sets free the woman-adulterer from stoning to death? The one who feeds the poor? The one who heals the blind and leprosy? The one who brings life back to the death? What's wrong with Israel? You got to know that only the depravity that can make Barabas set free and Jesus set to death! The depravity I say, not EXTOLMENT!     

My response: You are wrong about two people can’t be crucified, only one can.  There were two thieves crucified with Jesus, one on each side. Because some people screamed for his crucifixion that does not mean that everyone since that time who is Jewish should be condemned.  Jesus died for your sins and mine, not just because of those actions.  Moreover, you cannot blame generations following for the crucifixion.  Actually, it was your sins and my sins involved in his death.

He wrote: Ninth, it must be clear for being logic: the Evangel, Torah, Psalms are corrupted by Israel. There will be no sufficient reason to believe that Bible (NT - OT) is all pure and authentic. Both Israel and their Bible (NT - OT) are not subjects to believe in as history shows their depravity. Just cling to the history / fact, not to the system of faith. Clinging to the faith is the second matter; the first is cling to the fact!! Or, can any of Christians (or Jews as well) determine which verse of Bible (NT - OT) is as pure as it is first revealed? Or, are they determining that all verses in Bible (NT - OT) are trustworthy? If so, what about the depravity of Israel? Isn't there any correlation between the trustworthiness of the Bible (NT - OT) and the Israel depravity? How come? Where do all Christians (and Jews as well) position the depravity of Israel in the presence of Bible (NT - OT)?

My response: “Lo! We inspire thee as We inspired Noah and the prophets after him, as We inspired Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac and Jacob and the tribes, and Jesus and Job and Jonah and Aaron and Solomon, and as We imparted unto David the Psalms; And messengers We have mentioned unto thee before and messengers We have not mentioned unto thee; and Allah spake directly unto Moses;” (4:163-164, Pickthall)   “Let the People of the Gospel judge by that which Allah hath revealed therein. Whoso judgeth not by that which Allah hath revealed: such are evil-livers.” (5:47, Pickthall)

Please follow my comments closely.  If the Qur’an could say this about the Scriptures when Mohammed lived, then we are talking about trustworthy Scriptures.  The only way you can defeat this is to say Mohammed is a liar, which you will not do.  We have copies of the New Testament that go back to the third century AD, and fragments that are even earlier.  There are no attempts to erase any line from the Bible.   I don’t need to repeat the issue of the depravity of Israel again.

On the other hand, how do we know the Qur’an is correct?  There were a number of copies circulating following Mohammed’s death.   There were people who knew some suras that others did not.   There were people who were killed in battle who knew suras.  Moreover, all except one copy of the Qur’an were burned.  How do we know that it was the right one?

The issue of Abrogation of suras in the Qur’an is a serious problem. Muslim theologians assert that no fewer than 124 more peaceful verses were abrogated.   Does this not pose serious questions about the reliability of the Qur’an or Mohammed, or both? Does it not raise questions about the nature of Allah who could not get it right the first time?  Was Allah or Mohammed making it up as the situation demanded?

He wrote: Tenth, David had sex with someone's wife? And sent his men to kill the husband? Lot had sex with his daughters? Jacob wrestled with God? Jesus says: "before Abraham, I am"? There is no foretell in Bible (NT - OT) about the coming of Muhammad SAW? Of course there are lines in Bible (NT - OT) that foretell the coming of Muhammad SAW, but Israelites erase them! If you deny such lines ever existed in Bible (NT - OT) but Israel erased them, so what about Israel denial on the coming of Jesus?

My Response: I am surprised that you raised the question about sex. Did David get away with it? No, God sent the prophet Nathan to convict him of sin and God brought judgment on David.  What about Mohammed’s sex life?  I can say that David sinned.  Can you say Mohammed sinned in sexual matters?

How can you say Israel erased lines in the Bible.  Where were the lines?  Please see the paragraph above in which it is clear that the Bible was written before Mohammed and there are manuscripts that are much older than the Qur’an.  Moreover, there are thousands of copies in various parts of the world.  They agree.  Do you realize what kind of conspiracy would be required to travel to various parts of the world to change all these copies?   Moreover, the Jews who were not Christians had nothing to do with the writing of the New Testament.

Jews do not deny the existence of Jesus, some of them did not accept Him as Messiah and Son of God.   But thousands did and they spread the good news all throughout the Empire.

He wrote: Eleventh, is there a magic saying: yes Israel is depraved and not a subject to believe in since the beginning of time. But, when Christian arisen, there will be an exception: Israel would be so honest only this time? Is that so?

My Response: Your comment does not make sense to me.  If you wish to explain it further I would be happy to comment on it.

He wrote: Twelfth, as Jesus is 'perfectly' crucified on the cross suffering the death, something comes to his senses: "in this way, it is impossible that all my teachings would be preserved and protected. Their depravity crucifies and double-crosses Me, then the same thing will torture and twist My Words...." Isn't that so, my brother Christians?

My Response: How can you put your words in Jesus’ mind?  Would you want anyone to put words in Mohammed’s mind like “I don’t really believe all this, but it gives me power, women, and booty.”     What you hear from the cross is, “Father, forgive them.”  Putting your words into the story is as bad as the words you would not like put into Mohammed story.

He wrote: Because this is impossible: the depraved Israel crucifies Jesus, (and murders all ancient prophets, and twist the ancient holy books)

My Response: Not all ancient prophets were murdered, and you have no evidence that Israel twisted the holy books.   If you insist you declare Jesus to be a liar, and the Qur’an has a lie in it. Which way do you want to go?

He wrote: but the depraved Israel preserves His Words... Apparently, the depravity of Israel creates, and causes the chaos in re-writing the holy teachings. As Jesus is suffering death on the cross, then can Jesus put a hope too much that His Words would be everlasting in the hands of Israel since His name is not everlasting in the hands of Israel? And you, my Christian brother! Can you put a hope too much, that Jesus' Words would be everlasting in the hands of depraved Israel?

My Response:  This has been dealt with above.

He wrote: Seems to me that I hear you say: "with or without hope, the words of 'JESUS GOD' (Jesus is god? How many gods do you have since Ten Commandment states for you that -let there be no God but your God. Where do you position the Ten Commandment in 'Jesus god'?) are indeed everlasting as the Bible states that in clear words". No, my brother! Never cling anymore to what your faith says. Just cling to what happened factually!!!!!! You are not a child anymore. You are grownup now! Put your feet back on the ground. Leave the cradle. Leave the bed-stories. Dear my Christian brother, you are not there when Jesus is crucified to know and to see what is really going on.

My Response: Christians have always affirmed belief in one God who has revealed Himself as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.  The essence or the nature of God is one, the persons three.  If you read the New Testament you will be aware of God’s revelation of Himself.  This is from the beginning of the life of Jesus.

Your comment about “cling to what happened factually!!!!”  is worth looking at.  The Qur’an claims things that never happened. Will you be realistic and deal with facts? The Qur’an claims that Jesus spoke from the cradle and as a child made a clay pigeon, breathed into it, and it became alive. The Gospel of John, written long before this Gnostic story circulated and was heard by Mohammed, declares that Jesus’ first miracle was done at a wedding in Cana of Galilee.  You have a choice of a historical fact of Cana or a fable that is false.  One is real and one is a bedtime story in the Qur’an. You can’t make a fable into a fact.

Similarly, you were not in Mecca or Medina when Mohammed was there to see if he was a genuine prophet.   How can you trust the words of a man who robbed, killed, gave permission to lie and deceive and other sins?

He wrote: Dear my brother. You always convince yourself that the words of God in Bible (NT - OT) are everlasting as each verse therein states that. And you are so inspired and powered with that conviction. As I have told you before, one thing you should know, if indeed each line in Bible (NT - OT) is everlasting since the beginning, so why the Judaic agents deny Jesus?     

My Response: This may be hard for you to understand since Muslims do not allow freedom. The Pharisees and Sadducees rejected Jesus because of their position in power.  When you read the story the Gospels declare that these people were afraid that Rome would come and take away their positions.   They were free to rebel against God as they were free to rebel in the Old Testament.

What kind of freedom is in Islam? Can you reject the imam’s words?  Can you have different views on the Qur’an?  Can you allow non-Muslims to exist in your society?

Do you want Sharia law to be introduced against non-Muslims? Muslims have not learned that forced conversion, forced worship, forced conforming is not real. God is not pleased with this and cannot be fooled. Only the Devil would be pleased with forced worship.

He wrote: And why Jesus sees so many corruptions in the Scriptures? Why Jesus always gets involved in quarrels with the rabbis on sensitive issues? Aren't they familiar with the ideas Jesus brings? Why everything Jesus teaches is so strange to all rabbis, since Jesus teaches nothing but what lives in Bible (NT - OT), things they possess in their hands? Dear my Christian brother. Simply, there is nothing in your Bible (NT - OT), which you can hold on to.

My Response: I have already answered this above.  The Bible is trustworthy.  Even if I am disobedient to some command in the Bible, that does not make it untrue.  It is true although I may be disobedient.

He wrote: Thirteenth. The Proves of twisting:   1. In his life, Jesus worships God and only God, which means, Jesus is not a god.     

My Response: Your choice of words is unfortunate. Read the real story in Luke, 3:21-22 , “While everyone else was being baptized, Jesus himself was baptized. Then as he prayed, the sky opened up,   and the Holy Spirit came down upon him in the form of a dove. A voice from heaven said, "You are my own dear Son, and I am pleased with you."

In this passage Jesus is talking with His father which is what praying is about.  You will also note that the Christian idea of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are in these verses.  The Trinity is not something that Christians invented, the facts about it are in the early documents.

He wrote: 2. In Christianity, Jesus is indeed god. In his life, Jesus states that he won't make any changes in religion, won't come for new religion.

My Response: Matthew  5:17 “Don't suppose that I came to do away with the Law  and the Prophets. I did not come to do away with them, but to give them their full meaning.”   To give them their full meaning does not do away with them.   This is the fulfillment, not the destruction of the Law.  Matthew 28:18-20 indicates that Jesus said to his followers,

 “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,   teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age.” (Matthew 28:19-20)

He wrote: 3. In Christianity, Jesus is known as the founder of new religion. In his life, Jesus teaches that all men are the sons of God.

My Response: What is the basis of this statement? Jesus said to the Pharisees,“Your father is the devil, and you do exactly what he wants. He has always been a murderer and a liar. There is nothing truthful about him. He speaks on his own, and everything he says is a lie. Not only is he a liar himself, but he is also the father of all lies.”  John 8:44

 All people are a creation of God, but only those who give themselves to Jesus are the sons and daughters of God.  John 1:12-13  says,
 
 “But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God,  who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God.”

 To be a child of God means you have to receive Jesus as Lord.

He wrote: 4. In Christianity, Jesus is the only son of God. Jesus in his life adopts Ten Commandments that says: let there be no God but your God, the only God, God of heaven and earth. In Christian life, beside God, Jesus is indeed god supported by and on any stupid theory / rhetoric. Christians often say: "O my dear Jesus GOD..." -or- "O Jesus my GOD... " Or in complete, "God Father (it is God), God Jesus, and God Holy Spirit.... AMEN".     

My Response: If Jesus is the Son of God, or God embodied, what is wrong with addressing prayer to Him?   He is God. I would suggest that you read the Gospel of John and see the real story,
 
 “Don't you believe that I am one with the Father  and that the Father is one with me? What I say isn't said on my own. The Father who lives in me does these things.  Have faith in me when I say that the Father is one with me and that I am one with the Father. Or else have faith in me simply because of the things I do.” (John 14:10-11)

He wrote: 5. In his life, Jesus adopts Ten Commandments that says: never make any idol like My             Creation, in sky, in ocean and beneath the ground. In Christian life, even churches adopt, make, and collect so many statues like His Creations.

My Response: The issue in the Ten Commandments is that you shall not worship them. Making pictures of anything of beauty is not idolatry. An idol is something worshiped, a picture is not worshiped but frames a lovely memory of a person, landscape, or event.

He wrote: 6. In his life, Jesus never teaches some secularism. In your Christian community life now, secularism is indeed a strong value that lives among churches and monasteries.

My Response: What do you mean by secularism?  I know what it is, but do you? What is your point?

He wrote: 7. In his life, Jesus never launches war. In Christian life, war is the only 'instrument' to rule the whole world and faith; we all Muslims in the East must suffer bloody war year after year which launched by your people. While your people are launching war against our people, your priests Christianised our helpless children, brothers and sisters.

My Response: You should read the history of Islam.  I know you probably have a mentality that Muslims never start anything wrong, but Mohammed and Islam started war on the pagans of Arabia. After that Muslims invaded the west, captured Jerusalem, Egypt, North Africa, Spain and France. You need to read the shame that Muslims brought to the West.  The Crusades were only attempts to regain the Holy Land because it was once the cradle of the beginning of Christianity.  I hope you don’t have the mental mind set that you can’t accept the fact of Muslim terrorism. The air craft crashes into Twin Towers was done by Saudi men, Muslims, not Jews, or anyone else.

He wrote: 8. In his life, Jesus teaches that all women shall stay at home (women seclusion). In your Christian life, churches and your social organizations send women out to have outdoor activities.     

My Response: What evidence do you give for this?  Consider the gospels, Matthew 15:38, “There were four thousand men who ate, not counting the women and children.” Women have lots of freedom in Christian history, here they were out with Jesus along with their children.  There is no command that women be secluded. It is an injustice to women to have their secluded at home and having to wear a black tent covering their whole body in public.  This is a shame, and you ought to preach against it.  You should persuade your imam to preach about the evils done to women in Islam.

He wrote: 9. In his life, Jesus teaches and adopts circumcision. In Christian life, circumcision denied. Thanks to Paul.

My Response: You should re-read the story of circumcision in the letters of Paul.  Jesus really did not talk about circumcision except to make a point that it came before Moses. The issue was whether one had to be circumcised to enter the Kingdom of God, and the answer was no.  Faith in Jesus was required instead.

He wrote: 10. In his life, Jesus buries the death with shroud. Even they shrouded Jesus' body to bury him. In Christian life, the death is not shrouded. They dress them with decent cloth instead.

My Response: Your point is not clear. What is the issue?

He wrote: 11. Jesus stones the adulterers. In Christian life, adulterers (prostitutes) are free, stoning the adulterers rejected.

My Response: Where did Jesus stone adulterers?  Where in the New Testament is stoning adultery commanded?   You are imposing Muslim values on the life of Jesus.

He wrote: 12. Jesus only teaches Israel. In Christian life, churches teach Christianity to all nations.     

My Response: The Messiah came to Israel, but the Messiah also gave the command to go into all the world and preach the Gospel to everyone.   Keep in mind that the Christian movement did not command jihad against the unbelievers.

He wrote: 13. Jesus and his disciples don't sing. Now, all Christians sing.

My Response: How do you know they did not sing?  “But the chief priests and the teachers of the Law of Moses were angry when they saw his miracles and heard the children shouting praises to the Son of David.  The men said to Jesus, "Don't you hear what those children are saying?" "Yes, I do!" Jesus answered. "Don't you know that the Scriptures say, 'Children and infants will sing praises'?" (Matt. 21:15-16)   What do you think the Psalms of the Old Testament were?   Many of them were praises to Yahweh.  Mohammed was against music and fun.

He wrote: Why can't Christian and its people live with harmony with Jesus life? Thus, if all Christians now are inspired to live in harmony with Jesus life then based on what sources do they have? Bible (NT - OT)? Church constitutions?

My Response: There is only one source for the Christian faith and that is the Bible, predominantly the New Testament. Jesus is our Lord and Savior.

He wrote: Fourteenth. Even until today, Jews don't believe in all materials of Christians. And Christians don't believe in all materials of Judaism. The question is, who is wrong? Who is right? The only answer is, b-o-t-h are wrong! How could you be so blind while 'the proof is in the pudding'? Both Jews don't believe in Christian materials and Christians don't believe in Judaism materials only show you that you, Christians and Jews are in suspicion one to each other. Christians say that there is something wrong in Judaism, and so do Jews. It only derives us to say, that Israel is so depraved, and the blood of Israel corrupted the revelation! That's the only conclusion you can take. This is not a possibility. But this is what happens 'in an egg'; you don't and you can't see it, but it is.

My Response: Your logic is wrong. If Judaism is wrong, why must Christianity be wrong also?

One could say Judaism, Islam and Christianity don’t agree and they are all wrong.   I cannot say that they are all wrong, but Christianity completes Judaism, and there is no place for Islam as a better religion. Your antisemitism comes through in these comments again.

Moreover, Christians do not reject the Old Testament as being useless.  Jesus quoted the Old Testament and the stories of the Old Testament are the stories of the journey of faith and sometimes lack of faith.  These things were written for our encouragement. Many of the New Testament letters as well as the Gospels quote the Old Testament.

He wrote: Fifteen. Jesus says to Israel, "all the cocks haven't cock-a doodle-doo this morning, but you have denied Me three times..."

What is that mean? Why must Jesus say that to his people? Isn't that a sign of depravity? Do all Muhammad's followers deny Him in that early?

My Response: Please read the real story:  “Then saith Jesus unto them, All ye shall be offended because of me this night: for it is written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock shall be scattered abroad.   But after I am risen again, I will go before you into Galilee.   Peter answered and said unto him, Though all menshall be offended because of thee, yet will I never be offended.  Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, That this night, before the cock crow, thou shalt deny me thrice.   Peter said unto him, Though I should die with thee, yet will I not deny thee. Likewise also said all the disciples.    (Matthew 26:31-35)

Please remember that this was a denial for short time.  Peter was transformed by the appearance of Jesus in his resurrection and became a leader in the early church at Jerusalem later giving his life for his faith.

He wrote: The conclusion on Christian Sahada Statement I is D.O.I that stands for Depravity Of Israel. Dear my Scriptural Brother. I would like to tell you, that this is not about what your faith is trying to convince and inspire you. But this is all about what Israel is. This is all about Israel, their depravity. Talking about religion and its promises, of course would always be an interesting session.

My Response: I am sorry that you are so adamant that Israel is the problem. Mohammed’s hatred of the Jews has been taught universally in Islam. Blaming all Jews for what one group of people did is like blaming all Muslims for 9-11. Is this reasonable?  Logical?  Absolutely not. Mohammed’s hatred of the Jews was due to their dis-trust of him.  They knew he was not a legitimate prophet and he could not stand their rejection.  Their rejection undermined his authority in Medina.

He wrote: Not just Christian that is interesting, but also Hinduism, Buddhism and Islam are interesting. But what is about the background of each religion? Like a person. What he promises you all sounds like heaven comes to you. But what is he?

My Response: I would suggest that you read these articles (1,2) and see the answers.

He wrote: Simply, all the points above show us that Israelites are depraved.

My Response: Fortunately you have not proven your point!!!  You have shown your prejudices, bias, and faulty logic.

He wrote: Unfortunately, this nation is the one who conveys the Revelations. Then, is it possible that the Revelations are preserved?

No matter how strong your conviction is, still there is nothing you can do about the depravity of Israel. And thus, the depravity must have affected the purity of Bible. You can make a proof that Bible is preserved. But the question are,

1. Which Bible?
2. Where do you position the depravity of Israel in this matter?

Is it possible for a nation who are accustomed to murder all the prophets, to preserve their Books?

My Response: First, you don’t give any credit to God for the preservation of the Scriptures. Second, you haven’t proven that the Jews corrupted the Bible.  Your claim would make Jesus to be a liar, or deceived.  Third, you have not mentioned the fact that Satan got his message into the Qur’an:  “Have ye thought upon Al-Lat and Al-'Uzza And Manat, the third, the other are yours the males and His the females? (Sura 53)” Is this purity?

Fourth, you might raise the question in your self, if Satan inspired part of the Qur’an, what keeps one from asking if Satan inspired more of it, like hating the Jews, secluding women, the concept of Jihad and other things?

I am not sure why you wrote to me.  However, I have taken time to answer many of these issues.  Let me urge you to pray to God that He will show you who is the Savior.

God loves you and wants to deliver you from the slavery of false teaching.  God came in the person of Jesus to bring forgiveness, peace, and the promise of the Holy Spirit to live in your life.  On top of it, Jesus promises you the gift of everlasting life in His presence.  I hope you will come to accept His gift.   I send this to you with a prayer that God will open your eyes to Him.

Blessings.... Dallas M. Roark, Ph.D.

Source : http://answering-islam.org/authors/roark/letter1.html

I H S

Top Ten Misconceptions About Islam

by Dallas M. Roark, Ph.D. 

In the course of surfing the web, I came upon a site I had not viewed before. I was intrigued by the title, Top Ten Misconceptions About Islam. This topic seemed interesting and I read the article.

What interested me was the misconceptions about the misconceptions. As I read the “misconceptions” I could not resist thinking in my mind how misleading these ideas were. They did not tell the whole story, they left out the really bad parts they were trying to defend.

So, you might consider who is right on the following misconceptions. I left out a couple of them because they were irrelevant to the big issue of Islam. So here is the first one.

MISCONCEPTION #1: Muslims are violent, terrorists and/or extremists.

This is the biggest misconception in Islam, amplified to an extreme by the events af recent years. It is in no doubt worsened by the constant stereotyping and bashing the media gives Islam.

When a gunman attacks a mosque in the name of Judaism, a Catholic IRA guerrilla sets off a bomb in an urban area, or Serbian Orthodox militiamen rape and kill innocent Muslim civilians, these acts are not used to stereotype an entire faith. Never are these acts attributed to the religion of the perpetrators. Yet how many times have we heard the words 'Islamic, Muslim fundamentalist. etc.' linked with violence? Politics in so called "Muslim countries" may or may not have any Islamic basis. Often dictators and politicians will use the name of Islam for their own purposes.

Response:
First, the media has not been bashing Islam. One may read about a violent act of killing and the media does not indicate the fact that the person was a Muslim. Television news is very careful to shield the religious background of Muslim killers.

Second, gunman do not attack mosques because the Old Testament tells them to, nor do Catholics set off bombs because the New Testament tells them to do this, nor do the Orthodox rape and kill innocent Muslim civilians because the New Testament tells them to do this.

In contrast, why do Muslims destroy Christian churches, and burn Christian homes in Pakistan? Acts of violence by Muslims against “unbelievers” are permitted in the Qur’an, and in some passages even mandated. The Qur’an does not say burn houses, but it does say that Christians are not to be tolerated as citizens of equal rights in their culture, being demoted to second or third class citizens. One of the favorite ways of Muslims winning disputes against Christians is to charge the Christian with desecrating the Qur’an. This brings out hundreds of people to destroy the home of the Christian and run them out of the village.

There are other ways Muslims have persecuted Christians, claiming they have blasphemed Mohammed. One such example is:

Over the weekend at least nine Christians were killed, churches were set on fire, and businesses and homes destroyed in the Tundun Wada area of Kano State, Nigeria, according to reports.

The violence, allegedly committed by Muslim youths, followed unspecified claims that Christians had blasphemed the Islamic prophet Mohammed.

According to sources on the ground, not a single Christian church, house or business had been left undamaged and an unknown number of people were injured and displaced during the violence, reported U.K.-based Christian Solidarity Worldwide (CSW), which monitors persecution of Christians internationally. (See here.)

The author of the “misconceptions” continues:

“One should remember to go to the source of Islam and separate what the true religion of Islam says from what is portrayed in the media. Islam literally means 'submission to God' and is derived from a root word meaning 'peace'.  Islam may seem exotic or even extreme in the modern world. Perhaps this is because religion doesn't dominate everyday life in the West, whereas Islam is considered a 'way of life' for Muslims and we make no division between secular and sacred in our lives.

Like Christianity, Islam permits fighting in self-defense, in defense of religion, or on the part of those who have been expelled forcibly from their homes. It lays down strict rules of combat which include prohibitions against harming civilians and against destroying crops, trees and livestock

NOWHERE DOES ISLAM ENJOIN THE KILLING OF INNOCENTS. The Qur’an says:

"Fight in the cause of God against those who fight you, but do not transgress limits. God does not love transgressors." Qur’an al-Baqara 2:190)

If they seek peace, then seek you peace. And trust in God for He is the One that heareth and knoweth all things." -- Qur’an al-Anfal 8:61

War, therefore, is the last resort, and is subject to the rigorous conditions laid down by the sacred law. The term 'jihad' literally means 'struggle'. Muslims believe that there are two kinds of jihad. The other 'jihad' is the inner struggle of the soul which everyone wages against egotistic desires for the sake of attaining inner peace.”

Response:
Yes, let us look at the Qur’an to see what it really says. The Qur’an contradicts the “peace” expressed in the quotes above.

 “O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites! Be harsh with them. Their ultimate abode is hell, a hapless journey's end.” (9:73)

So obey not the disbelievers, but strive against them herewith with a great endeavour. (25:52)

O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey's end. (66:9)

Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free.... (9:5)

Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the religion of truth, until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low.

And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah, and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah. That is their saying with their mouths. They imitate the saying of those who disbelieved of old. Allah (Himself) fighteth against them. How perverse are they! (9:29,30)

O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites! Be harsh with them. Their ultimate abode is hell, a hapless journey’s end. (9:73)

O ye who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allah is with those who keep their duty (unto Him). (9:123)

Muslim propagandists seek to deceive the unknowing reader in claiming Islam to be a peaceful religion. In seeking to do this, Muslims quote from the early days of Mohammed’s life in Mecca in which there are verses indicating that there is no compulsion in religion. However, when Mohammed became powerful in Medina things changed. Mohammed began legislating the real nature of Islam which involved attacking caravans, other towns, killing people who wrote satirical poetry about him, killing Jews, killing poly-theists, and ultimately moving his troops out of Saudi Arabia conquering other nations.

From the standpoint of the Qur’an there are no innocents. Simply rejecting Islam is to become the enemy of Islam. Anyone who is not a Muslim is guilty and can be dealt with in regard to the severe commands of the Medina suras in the Qur’an. Moreover, from the history of Islam non-Muslims have not been allowed to live in peace beside Muslims. Three options were given: accept Islam, reject Islam and pay the jizya or death. There is no living a normal life at peace within Islam for a non-Muslim.

Moreover, the peaceful suras from the Mecca period were abrogated later when Mohammed was in Medina. There are differences between Muslim scholars but some have taught that up to 260 suras have been abrogated. The idea that Islam is a religion of peace appears to be abrogated by the later suras commanding jihad against everyone who is not a Muslim.

On a practical level, if one takes a look at the daily news how can one conclude that Islam is a peaceful religion when Shia are fighting Sunna, all of them fighting the Bahai, Muslims are fighting the Hindus, Muslims are killing Buddhists, the Copts in Egypt, and Christians elsewhere.

There is not a “moderate Muslim movement” that stands up for “peaceful” Islam. Peaceful Islam does not exist and cannot exist as long as the Qur’an is held in authority.

The site propagates the idea that only a defensive war is justified. What is considered an attack on Islam? Merely rejecting Islam is the basis of confrontation and becomes a motive for attacking non-Muslims. Mohammed sent letters to rulers outside Arabia inviting them to Islam. If they accepted, there would be peace. If they rejected his invitation to Islam, war followed.

MISCONCEPTION #2: Islam oppresses women.

The image of the typical Muslim woman wearing the veil and forced to stay home and forbidden to drive is all too common in most peoples thoughts. Although some Muslim countries may have laws that oppress women, this should not be seen as coming from Islam. Many of these countries do not rule by any kind of Shari'ah (Islamic law) and introduce their own cultural standpoints on the issue of gender equity

Islam on the other hand gives men and women different roles and equity between the two is laid down in the Qur’an and the example of the Prophet (peace be upon him). Islam sees a woman, whether single or married, as an individual in her own right, with the right to own and dispose of her property and earnings. A marriage gift is given by the groom to the bride for her own personal use, and she keeps her own family name rather than taking her husband's. Both men and women are expected to dress in a way that is modest and dignified. The Messenger of God (peace be upon him) said: "The most perfect in faith amongst believers is he who is best in manner and kindest to his wife."

Violence of any kind towards women and forcing them against their will for anything is not allowed. A Muslim marriage is a simple, legal agreement in which either partner is free to include conditions.  Marriage customs thus vary widely from country to country.  Divorce is not common, although it is acceptable as a last resort. According to Islam, a Muslim girl cannot be forced to marry against her will: her parents simply suggest young men they think may be suitable.

Response:
Let’s start with the recent news. There were also photos of the event in which the men and girls were celebrating their wedding. Of course, the standard reply is that Mohammed did this so it is proper today. Ask any medical doctor and he will tell you that kids are not physically, emotional, and mentally matured for marriage. Mohammed at least let Aisha bring her dolls when he married her. Here is a news item from:

Monday, August 10, 2009 A gala event has occurred in Gaza. Hamas sponsored a mass wedding for four hundred and fifty couples. Most of the grooms were in their mid to late twenties; most of brides were under ten. Muslim dignitaries including Mahmud Zahar, a leader of Hamas, were on hand to congratulate the couples who took part in the carefully staged celebration. (See here.)

On driving, well the most staunch Muslim country, Saudi Arabia, does not allow women to drive a car. Saudi Arabia is considered the fountainhead of Islam. What is wrong with a woman driving a car?  It is not mentioned in the Qur’an or the Sunna, nor the Hadiths.  Cars were not invented until modern times.  There are Muslims who claim that all kinds of modern ideas and discoveries were referenced in the Qur’an, maybe a closer look would uncover the car and who should drive it.  The problem with women driving a car is that it gives them freedom which they have never had.

Analyze the following statement by the author:  “Although some Muslim countries may have laws that oppress women, this should not be seen as coming from Islam.” 

Why not?  What motivation is there for oppressing women if it were not for Islam.  If Islam is the dominant religion of the Muslim countries why is there not a movement   by the leading Muslim scholars in those countries to upgrade the position of women? Maybe the reason is that the Qur’an forbids it. Did not Mohammed declare that women are only half as intelligent as men?  Did not Mohammed require that women only receive half the inheritance that men receive?  Did not Mohammed teach that women’s testimony is only half that of men?  Is there a Muslim country that does not have Sharia that is not trying to impose it on the country?   Muslims in England are trying to impose Sharia law on their own communities there.  

The author says, “Many of these countries do not rule by any kind of Shari'ah (Islamic law) and introduce their own cultural standpoints on the issue of gender equity.”  This sentence seems to imply that Sharia would liberate women from oppressive measures in countries without Sharia.    Sharia is the problem.  In the countries seeking to impose sharia it has been detrimental to women’s rights and freedom.  One of the first oppressive measures is to require women to “cover up.” 

One might raise the question also about honor killings of women, single and married.  In what culture do these killings occur?   The killers are usually Muslim. Just today I read of a “Muslim man sentenced to life in jail after killing his German-born wife because she was 'too independent.”  (See here.)

The news sources seem regularly to chronicle  honor killings  in England, USA, France, Pakistan, wherever there are lots of Muslims.   Does this not sound like an awful oppression.   Rarely does one hear of honor killings of Muslim men.   Surely the author is hiding the real story about women in Islam.

MISCONCEPTION #3:  Muslims worship a different God.

Allah is simply the Arabic word for God. Allah for Muslims is the greatest and most inclusive of the Names of God, it is an Arabic word of rich meaning, denoting the one and only God and ascribing no partners to Him. It is exactly the same word which the Jews, in Hebrew, use for God (aloha), the word which Jesus Christ used in Aramaic when he prayed to God. God has an identical name in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam; Allah is the same God worshiped by Muslims, Christians and Jews.  Muslims believe that Allah's sovereignty is to be acknowledged in worship and in the pledge to obey His teaching and commandments, conveyed through His messengers and prophets who were sent at various times and in many places throughout history. However, it should be noted that God in Islam is One and Only. He, the Exalted, does not get tired, does not have a son i.e. Jesus or have associates, nor does He have human-like attributions as found in other faiths.

Response:
Allah may be used as a name for God in Islam, but that cannot be his name in the Bible.

Yahweh is the name of God. God is not His name. God is a general term referring to the divine being whose name is Yahweh.  There are lots of reasons to think that Allah and Yahweh are not the same.   “... in orthodox Islam the Holy Spirit is not God, but the angel Gabriel. This fact separates Allah from ever possibly being the same God that Christians worship.” For many more reasons that the same God is not worshiped. (Go here.)         

One cannot merely use a common term and claim identity.  One has to know something of the character of God, his attributes, his dealing with mankind.  When one examines all of these and more, it becomes obvious that Christians and Muslims do not worship the same being.

Christians claim that God has revealed Himself embodied in Jesus the Christ. This is seen in the following examples of Scripture.

 “For in him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily...” (Colossians 2:9)

 “He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation.  For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities--all things were created through him and for him.”  Colossians 1:15-16

 “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and   the   Word was God.    He was in the beginning with God.”  John 1:1-2

"And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth.”  John 1:14

"No one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father's side, he has made him known. John 1:18    (ESV)  

Since God has revealed Himself in this fashion, since God assumed human form in the person of Jesus Christ, how can one conclude that God would  give a new revelation later  and deny the previous revelation?  Moreover, the prophetic literature of the Old Testament gives a basis for the coming of the Messiah, but there is absolutely no Old Testament or New Testament basis for the coming of Mohammed and a new revelation!

The character of God in the Old and New Testaments is quite different than the character of God in the Qur’an.   To claim that Jews, Christians, and Muslims worship the same being is deceiving and obscures the blatant differences between the Bible and the Qur’an.

MISCONCEPTION #4: Islam was spread by the sword and intolerant of other faiths.

Many social studies textbooks for students show the image of an Arab horseman carrying a sword in one hand and the Qur'an in the other conquering and forcibly converting. This, though, is not a correct portrayal of history.  Islam has always given respect and freedom of religion to all faiths. The Qur’an says:

"God forbids you not, with regards to those who fight you not for [your] faith nor drive you out of your homes, from dealing kindly and justly with them; for God loveth those who  are just. -- Qur’an al-Mumtahina 60:8

Freedom of religion is laid down in the Qur’an itself:

"There is no compulsion (or coercion) in the religion (Islam).  The right direction is distinctly clear from error".  -- Qur’an al-Baqara 2:256

Christian missionary, T.W. Arnold had this opinion on his study of the question of the spread of Islam: "... of any organized attempt to force the acceptance of Islam on the non-Muslim  population, or of any systematic persecution intended to stamp out the Christian religion, we hear  nothing. Had the caliphs chosen to adopt either course of action, they might have swept away Christianity as easily as Ferdinand and Isabella drove Islam out of Spain, or Louis XIV made Protestantism ..."

It is a function of Islamic law to protect the privileged status of minorities, and this is why non-Muslim places of worship have flourished all over the Islamic world.  History provides many examples of Muslim tolerance towards other faiths: when the caliph Omar entered Jerusalem  in the year 634, Islam granted freedom of worship to all religious communities in the city.   Proclaiming to the inhabitants that their lives, and property were safe, and that their places of worship would never be taken from them, he asked the Christian patriarch Sophronius to accompany him on a visit to all the holy places.  Islamic law also permits non-Muslim minorities to set up their own courts, which implement family laws drawn up by the minorities themselves. The life and property of all citizens in an Islamic state are considered sacred whether the person is Muslim or not.

Racism is not a part of Islam, the Qur’an speaks only of human equality and how all peoples are equal in the sight of God.

 O mankind! We created you from a single soul, male and female, and made you into nations and tribes, so that you may come to know one another.  Truly, the most honored of you in God's sight is the greatest of you in piety.  God is All-Knowing, All- Aware."  -- Qur’an al-Hujraat 49:13

Response:
Sheer propaganda!!  Distortion of history!!   From the very beginning of Mohammed’s rule in Medina force was the predominate instrument in his strategy. It seems that the author of these comments has not read the Life of Muhammad, by Ibn Ishaq.  Abu Sufyan who was an enemy of Mohammed was brought to Mohammed who said, “Woe to you, Abu Sufyan, isn’t it time you recognize that I am God’s apostle?  He answered, “As to that I still have some doubt.”

I said to him, “Submit and testify that there is no God but Allah and that Muhummad is the apostle of God before you lost your head,” and he did so.” (Page 547)  The Life of Muhammad records the battles, the atrocities heaped upon disbelieving people, the coercion, the force used in bringing Islam to Arabia and other areas.

When Mohammed conquered Mecca he did not do it with 10,000 pilgrims who were peaceful and loving, they were his soldiers willing to kill anyone who opposed them. The story of Islam’s spread to Jerusalem, Egypt, North Africa, and on to Spain cannot be understood without the concept of the sword.   I don’t know where the “missionary” Arnold got his information but it was not out of Islamic sources, and it is certainly an ignorant statement.   Like many Muslim statements there are not sources cited for the quote to be checked out along with the person’s credentials.

How do Muslims deal with the contradiction posed here?  On the one hand there is no compulsion in religion and on the other hand, there is compulsion in religion.   Mohammed changed his mind?  Allah changed his mind?  The “no compulsion” verses come from the early period when Mohammed was trying to gain followers in Mecca.  The compulsion verses come from the Medina period after Mohammed had gained power. What happened to the divine revelation in Mecca?   Can you really trust a prophet who changes his mind, or a deity who changes his mind?  Can you trust a propagandist who tells you only one side of the story?

Read the account in the following paragraph to see something of the violence of Islam.

 “The Muslim historian Baladhuri (d. 892 C.E.), maintained that 30,000 Samaritans and 20,000 Jews lived in Caesarea alone just prior to the Arab Muslim conquest; afterward, all evidence of them disappears. Archaeological data confirms the lasting devastation wrought by these initial jihad conquests, particularly the widespread destruction of synagogues and churches from the Byzantine era, whose remnants are still being unearthed. The total number of towns was reduced from fifty—eight to seventeen in the red sand hills and swamps of the western coastal plain (i.e., the Sharon).” (Source)

It appears that the author of these misconceptions has never heard of dhimmitude.  The concept of dhimmi came into being when there was more profit in keeping non-believers alive rather than killing them outright. Dhimmitude is the idea of enslaving non-Muslims, reducing them to second or third class citizens. 

 Referring to the Christians of Syria, ‘Umar, the second Caliph declared:

 “They are forbidden to build churches, or monasteries, in their cities or nearby areas. They are not allowed to renovate such buildings. They must allow any Muslim to lodge in these buildings for three nights, and provide him with food. They must never shelter a spy, nor show any duplicity to Muslims. They are not to teach their children the Qur’an. They must not display any sign of their unbelief, or forbid their relatives from converting freely to Islam. Furthermore, they must show reverence to Muslims, and give them pride of place at their assemblies. They should avoid appearing like Muslims in their clothing, their head covers, their shoes, and the parting of their hair. They must not speak the language of Muslims, nor use their names. They are not allowed to use a saddle on a beast of burden, nor bear a sword, nor any other weapon. Their rings must not bear any Arabic inscriptions. They must refrain from selling wine. They must have the front of their hair cut, and wear their own kind of clothing all the time, and must use belts. They are not to display a cross or any of their books, as they are passing Muslims on their way. Their dead must not be buried nearby a Muslim cemetery. They should not ring their bells in a loud manner; equally, they must not raise their voices while reading their Scriptures in their churches. They are forbidden to parade their palm branches (on Palm Sunday.)”

 “Now should Christians ever deviate from obeying these rules, Muslims would cease to honor the covenant that had protected them. In that case, Muslims can deal with them as if they have become people of discord and trouble.” (Source)

This is quite a contradiction to the claims of the author concerning freedom to worship, safety of the homes, the freedom of being a non-Muslim citizen.  Moreover, it appears that the author has not read the news of young girls in Egypt, Pakistan, and other places who are kidnapped and forced to convert to Islam and be married to somebody they know not. Also, the author presumes that the reader has not read of these terrible things done to girls and women.

One other comment, the author claims “Racism is not a part of Islam, the Qur’an speaks only of human equality and how all peoples are equal in the sight of God.” Where is there human equality in slavery, concubines, the selling of human beings into slavery?

The history of Islam from the beginning involves slavery.  Mohammed kept slaves, Islam has been involved in the slave trade through the centuries up to the modern era.  As late as 1965 the royal family of Saudi Arabic kept slaves. See here.      

MISCONCEPTION #8:   Muslims are a barbaric, backward people.

Among the reasons for the rapid and peaceful spread of Islam was the simplicity of its doctrine-Islam calls for faith in only one God worthy of worship.  It also repeatedly instructs man to use his powers of intelligence and observation. Within a few years, great civilizations and universities were flourishing, for according to the Prophet (pbuh), 'seeking knowledge is an obligation for every Muslim man and woman'.

The  synthesis of Eastern and Western ideas and of new thought with old, brought about great  advances in medicine, mathematics, physics, astronomy, geography, architecture, art, literature,  and history. Many crucial systems such as algebra, the Arabic numerals, and also the concept of  the zero (vital to the advancement of mathematics), were transmitted to medieval Europe from  Islam.  Sophisticated instruments which were to make possible the European voyages of discovery  were developed, including the astrolabe, the quadrant and good navigational maps.

Response:

First, there was no peaceful spread of Islam.  This is Islamic mythology. We have seen this above.   Second, strange that Muslim educators throughout history have apparently not understood the Quran whom these Muslims claim  instructs “man to use his powers of intelligence  and observation.”   Islamic education has not  encouraged the use of rationality and pursuit of knowledge.      Historical fact is that   education was restricted to the madrasas which excluded the natural sciences, or what Muslims called “foreign sciences.”  This is one of the reasons why Islamic science failed to break into the modern period.  Islam inherited the vast literature of the Greeks and many of these works were translated, often by Christians and Jews, into Arabic.

However, Islamic science did not advance beyond these works except in astronomy, math and medicine. The natural sciences were ignored.   Part of the reason may be seen in the attitude of the philosophers who believed that “ordinary citizens (the masses) are not capable of grasping the higher truths of philosophy....or the inner truths of the scriptures.”  (Toby Huff, The Rise of early modern science, p.82)

Muslim advances in the natural science were limited to areas useful for Muslim use. These science included medicine, astronomy, and mathematics, physics and optics. In spite of some advances in these areas the Islamic world never made the transition to the scientific revolution. Natural science has been in disrepute in Islam so long that in the mid-1980's Muslim intellectuals "lamented the fact that modern science had not taken root in the Islamic countries of the world..." (Huff, p. 235)

Consider the following: "In the actual event, the founding of Spanish universities in the thirteenth century, first in Palencia (1208-9), Valladolid, Salamanca (1227-28), and so on, occurred in long-established Christian areas, and the universities were modeled after the constitutions of Paris and Bologna. The various Arabic histories of Spain indicate that there were no Islamic colleges–madrasas--built in Spain prior to the fourteenth century, when one was founded in Granada ca.1349." (Huff, p. 206)    Remember that madrasas are not the same as universities. Madrasas did not encourage critical thinking as the universities did.    For more see here.

Islam did not know of a corporate entity which became the basis of the university in the west.  The corporation gave the university an independence that Madrasas did not have. Madrases were still controlled by Qur’anic law.  The university began with the idea of pursuing the truth wherever it led.   The madrases were intent upon indoctrination of the student and submission to Islam rather than questioning and critical thinking. This is part of the reason that Islamic natural sciences have been unproductive.  Only a few (8 or 9)   Muslims have won Nobel prizes in science while nearly 200 Jews have been awarded such scientific prizes.  The reason for the differences relates to the type of education existing in Muslim countries as opposed to western universities. Compare the population, a few million Jews in contrast to more than one billion Muslims.          

If seeking knowledge is so important for every Muslim man and woman, why are women so excluded from pursuing education? Why are Muslim schools for girls being blown up in various parts of the world?

Islamic writers seek to take credit for the zero.  The concept of the zero came from the Hindus, and should not be claimed by the Muslims.

MISCONCEPTION #10:   Muslims don't believe in Jesus or any other prophets.

Muslims respect and revere Jesus, upon him be peace, and await his Second Coming.   They consider him one of the greatest of God's messengers to mankind.  A Muslim never refers to him simply as 'Jesus', but always adds the phrase 'upon him be peace' (abbreviated as (u) here).   The Qur’an confirms his virgin birth (a chapter of the Qur’an is entitled 'Mary'), and Mary is considered the purest woman in all creation.

          The Qur’an describes the Annunciation as follows:

"Behold!" the Angel said, "God has chosen you, and purified you, and  chosen you above the women of all nations.  O Mary, God gives you good news of a word from Him whose name shall be the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, honored in this world and the Hereafter, and one of those  brought near to God.  He shall speak to the people from his cradle and in maturity, and shall be of the righteous." She said: "O my Lord! How shall I have a son when no man has touched me?" He said:  "Even so; God creates what He will.  When He decrees a thing, He says to it, "Be!" and it is."             -- Qur’an  al-E-Imran 3:42-47

Jesus (u) was born miraculously through the same power, which had brought Adam (u) into being without a father:

"Truly, the likeness of Jesus with God is as the likeness of Adam.  He created him of dust, and then said to him, 'Be!' and he was."            -- Qur’an al-E-Imran 3:59

During his prophetic mission Jesus (u) performed many miracles. The Qur’an tells us that he said:

"I have come to you with a sign from your Lord:  I make for you out of clay, as it were, the figure of a bird, and breath into it and it becomes a bird by God's leave.  And I heal the blind, and the lepers, and I raise the dead by God's leave."            -- Qur’an al-E-Imran 3:49)

Neither Muhammad (pbuh) not Jesus (u) came to change the basic doctrine of the brief in One God brought by earlier prophets, but to confirm and renew it. In the Qur’an Jesus (u) is reported as saying that he came:

"To attest the law which was before me.  And to make lawful to you part of what was forbidden you; I have come to you with a sign from your Lord, so fear God and obey Me."             -- Qur’an al-E-Imran 3:50

The Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) said:  "Whoever believes there is no god but God, alone without partner, that Muhammad (pbuh) is His messenger, that Jesus is the servant and messenger of God, His word breathed into Mary and a spirit emanating from Him, and that Paradise and Hell are true, shall be received by God into Heaven. "(Hadith related by Bukhari).

Response:
 “Muslims respect and revere Jesus,” it is declared. On the surface this seems like a good thing to say.

When you think about it with reference to the teaching of Jesus and what He said about Himself, it is not revering and respecting Him, for the Muslim claim about Jesus and his teaching reduces Him to being a liar, a false prophet, and a deceiver.

Consider the words of Jesus when he asked them who they thought he was.

He said to them, "But who do you say that I am?"  Simon Peter replied, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God."  And Jesus answered him, "Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven. And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.  Matthew 16:15-18

The disciple Philip requested that Jesus show him the Father.

Jesus said to him, "Have I been with you so long, and you still do not know me, Philip? Whoever has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, 'Show us the Father'?    Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own authority, but the Father who dwells in me does his works.   Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father is in me, or else believe on account of the works themselves.”   John 14:9-11

In an argument with the Pharisees, Jesus was asked:

 “Are you greater than our father Abraham, who died? And the prophets died! Who do you make yourself out to be?"    Jesus answered, "If I glorify myself, my glory is nothing. It is my Father who glorifies me, of whom you say, 'He is our God.'    But you have not known him. I know him. If I were to say that I do not know him, I would be a liar like you, but I do know him and I keep his word.    Your father Abraham rejoiced that he would see my day. He saw it and was glad."   So the Jews said to him, "You are not yet fifty years old, and have you seen Abraham?"    Jesus said to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am."  John    8:53-58

How can it be said that Muslim respect and revere Jesus when they declare his words to be false. How can they revere someone they think deceived people in claiming to be the Son of God when Muslims believe He is not.  Moreover, they deny the crucifixion and the resurrection of Jesus.   They attribute a silly miracle to him, the clay pigeon story and the story of Jesus speaking from his cradle that came from centuries later, and deny the most awesome miracle of His resurrection.

It appears that Mohammed did not really understand what Christian faith was and is. Consider the following two verses from the Qur’an:          

1)   “And because of their saying: We slew the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, Allah's messenger - they slew him not nor crucified him, but it appeared so unto them; and lo! those who disagree concerning it are in doubt thereof; they have no knowledge thereof save pursuit of a conjecture; they slew him not for certain.”   4:157 

The reference is to the so-called claim of the Jews that “we slew the Messiah.”  If they really believed that Jesus was the Messiah they would not have crucified Him.  They would have fallen to their knees and worshiped Him.   So not only did Mohammed not understand the implication of his statement, the Qur’an is wrong on the history of the event.

2)   “And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah, and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah. That is their saying with their mouths. They imitate the saying of those who disbelieved of old. Allah (Himself) fighteth against them. How perverse are they!”   9:30

In this case the Qur’an is wrong again.   No Jew or groups of Jews ever affirmed that Ezra was the son of Allah in the sense that the Messiah is The son of God.   The Qur’an is wrong on this historical item.

One last comment relates to the idea of partners to Allah.  Certainly Allah had many partners in pre-Islam Arabia.  However, confusion exists in the Muslim thinking about the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.  The idea of monotheism is securely preserved in Christian thought. Jesus speaks of the Father in the Son and the Son in the Father.  One may speak of distinct persons, but not separate persons.  The Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son to the believer. Separate persons would involve tri-theism perhaps, but distinct persons in a union of oneness preserves monotheism.   The early disciples who were devout Jews were clearly staunch monotheists.  The revelation that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself was difficult to accept because they had never encountered anyone like Him before.  This was the Christian message from the beginning recorded in the New Testament.  It has not changed.

There are other misconceptions that the author described but these were the most misleading ones and important ones.

Source : http://answering-islam.org/authors/roark/misconceptions.html

IHS