Thursday, 19 November 2009

Unpleaseant Truth about Allah and Muhammad

“Indeed, a very strange god and prophet”        

Let us (…) discuss how the challenge of Allah, the Al-mighty, was countered by his own abrogated verses. There are strong evidences in Sahih Bukhari and Tirmizi that Allah could not honor his own words; because Allah had to replace his immutable, divine, and most wise verses with other verses, or in many cases canceled them.

My question is: “Why Allah, the wisest creator, needed to supersede his own verses? Why did he forget the previous verses?” Muslims’ answer to this question is: “Because circumstances were changing through the period of revelations. It was necessary for a few verses to be abrogated, and a few to be replaced.” To counter, the next question I have is: “Why is it that those circumstances changed for only 23 years, in the life span of Muhammad, after he had claimed to be the prophet?” Circumstances always change.

Don’t Muslims think that circumstances also changed after 632 AD, till 2009, and will continue to change in the future? What shall we do now? Who will now abrogate such verses that clash with the present and will in the future? When we raise such questions the response from the Muslims is complete silence. Another solid evidence by Muslim historians bear witness that the challenge of Allah was also turned down by his own devout follower Uthman bin Affan. Islamic history tells us that to prevent the misconceptions, variations and errors propagated by various groups of Muslims, Uthman, the third Caliph of Islam, burned the original text of the Holy Qur’an, keeping only the compilation ordered by him. Islamic historians write that, because of the uniformity in eloquence in rhetoric in Arabic among the tribes in Arabia, Islam was spreading rapidly worldwide. To clear all misconceptions among Muslims, and to save the Ummah, therefore, Caliph Uthman made copies of his version of the Qur’an and sent them to several regions We may ask why did not Allah reveal his verses in the same eloquence that are found today? Who gave authority to Uthman to burn the original Qur’an and to compile a new version?

It is also very interesting that when Uthman was elected as the caliph of Islam, he was about 70 or 72 years old. History shows us that Uthman had close relatives who belonged to Banu Umayya. This aged man was very easy to be tricked and manipulated. On the other hand, Amir Muaweeya, the son of Abu Suffian, was the governor of Syria. Islamic historians agree that on the day of conquest of Mecca, after Muhammad broke all the idols in front of the Quraish, many infidels among Abu Suffian and Amir Muaweeya embraced Islam, either by heart or by force. My conjecture is that Muaweeya and Abu Suffian never accepted Islam by heart, because they had no other option but to accept Islam. Thus, during the caliphate of Uthman, when Muaweeya was enjoying the governorship of Syria, he was very well aware that the old man Uthman cannot establish laws on his own. Uthman had to depend on his allies and kinsmen. Muaweeya had never forgotten his fellowmen, who were killed by the Muslims, and the desecration of their sacred idols by Muhammad. I think Muaweeya had been carrying this grudge against Islam since that day. Elected as the governor of Syria, he was desperately waiting for the precise time to avenge the humiliation of his idols in the hands of the Muslims. Therefore, it is quite natural to think that it was Muaweeya, in the background, who had urged Uthman, to burn the original Qur’an.

The Sahabas (companions of Muhammad) also played an important role to preserve the Qur’an. Muslims claim that, many Sahabas, with their incredible memory, retained the Qur’an in their hearts: the divine verses were untouchable, and protected from the attack of infidels and outsiders. Most parts of the Qur’an, according to Muslims, were revealed in Mecca, before Muhammad’s migration to Medina. In the initial stages of revelation, vine or wine was not considered as the act of Satan. We can easily assume that drinking alcohol was not a problem in the early age of Qur’anic revelations. So, why later, Muhammad or Allah developed a great dislike for alcohol or vine? Even Muslims in Pakistan claim that Muhammad banned alcohol, because some Sahabas, including Ali (the cousin and son in law of Muhammad) while in the state of drunkenness during prayer, uttered some inappropriate words that were not in conformity with Islam. So, it is logical to think that those Sahabas (companions of Muhammad) who routinely drank alcoholic drinks did not deliver the divine messages properly. During the state of drunkenness they might have recited many verses differently from what Muhammad had revealed to them. Realizing this, the wisest and the mightiest Allah authorized Muhammad to abrogate and alter verses at his whims and fancies. Thus, we can say that not only many verses of the Qur’an had been abrogated, but many more verses have been changed by those who were routinely vine drinkers.

Islamic history tells us about Abdullah bin Sa’d, one of the scribes of Muhammad from Mecca. After Muhammad migrated to Medina he retained Abdullah to write the Qur’anic verses as dictated to Muhammad by Allah. During a divine inspiration session Abdullah discovered the fraudulency of Muhammad, and hastily returned to Mecca. Abdullah was convinced that Muhammad was an imposter, that Allah had never sent any divine messages to Muhammad. Muhammad never forgave Abdullah. When Muhammad invaded Mecca he ordered Abdullah bin Sa’d be killed, along with other pagans who had annoyed Muhammad in the past. We may wonder why a person, who was the writer of divine law and sacred verses, had to be killed by the Prophet of Islam. According to various sources, Abdullah bin Sa’d was a wise and knowledgeable man in Mecca. It was his habit, whenever prophet of Islam asked him to write such verse on anything, he, with his wisdom, knowledge, and ability used to tell Muhammad that the verses should be written in the exact form that Allah had revealed to Muhammad. Regardless, Muhammad gave importance to the wisdom of Abdullah bin Sa’d over to the wisdom of Almighty Allah. That was why, when Muhammad was in power, on the day of conquest of Mecca, he wanted him to be killed. It was Abdullah bin Sa’d’s good luck that. Uthman b. Affan saved his life, because Uthman was Abdullah’s foster brother. Thus, we may conclude that a talented man, with profound intellect, imagination and ability had constructed the Qur’an. Contradictions in the Holy Qur’an, is another lengthy topic which I do not wish to discuss in this article. Suffice it to say, numerous contradictions in the verses of the Holy Qur’an have been discovered and many will be found in the future.

The character of the Holy Prophet of Islam and his deeds

Muslims present the character of Muhammad as exemplary. He is considered the most honest, pious, humble, incorruptible, righteous, balanced, genius, and Rehmat ulil Alimeen (a mercy for whole Universe)…and so on-it is an endless list.

Let us discuss a few outstanding characters and deeds of Muhammad sourced from impeccable Islamic sources, such as Ahadith (Muhammad’s traditions) and Sira (Muhammad’s biography).
(1) Muhammad, Aisha and their dating

Muhammad’s first wife was Khadija, an influential and rich trader of Mecca. It is true that Muhammad did not marry any other women until Khadija’s death. He was very devoted to her through the rest of her life. She was considered a rich woman in the Quraish tribe. She died around 619 CE. Immediately after Khadija’s death, Muhammad started a chain of marriages. For a start, he married Aisha, the daughter of Abu Bakr, the first caliph of Islam, Narrations from Sahih Bukhari, the most authentic hadith compilation, gives us evidence that Aisha was only six years old when Muhammad, 50 or 51 years old, married her. When Aisha became nine years old she consummated her first night with her husband Muhammad, who was 53 or 54 then. Was it a love affair between Aisha and Muhammad? Muslims claim that, when Aisha, a nine- year-old girl consummated her first night with Muhammad, she had already attained puberty. But this claim is baseless and week, because many traditions from different Ahadith prove that after consummation of her first night with Muhammad, Aisha still played with her dolls. We know that a girl, shortly before her puberty, will quit playing with dolls, otherwise she is considered a retard.

Today, this kind of marriage with forty to or fifty years of age difference is considered highly contemptible and condemnable, especially in Western countries. Even in Islamic Republic of Pakistan, parents would not give their six or nine-year-old daughters in the hands of a fifty plus-year-old man. This tradition may still exist partially in some backward remote villages, but to the vast majority of Pakistanis this custom is not acceptable. Muslims defend by saying that this practice was followed in the primitive age in Arabia. This claim means that the Sunnah (following similar acts like that of the Prophet) to consummate marriage night with a nine-year-old girl was admirable in Muhammad’s time, but in the 21st century this tradition is not a civilized way of life.
(2) Muhammad seduced by his daughter-in-law

Zainab was also one of the wives of Muhammad .She was formerly married to Zaid bin Harith (adopted son of Muhammad). This relation tells us that Zainab was the daughter-in-law of Muhammad before the latter married her. The story goes that one day Muhammad tried to visit his son Zaid at his home. Zaid was not at home but Muhammad did not fail to catch a glimpse of a scantily dressed Zainab. .According to Tabari and Ibn Sa’d, the posture of a half naked Zainab highly amused or aroused Muhammad, so much so, that he started praising his Lord and mumbled some words that Allah, aware of all his intentions, could understand. Consequently, Zaid bin Harith divorced his wife Zainab ,just to pave way for Muhammad to fulfill his lust for her. On this occasion Allah revealed verse 33:37. It is clear from this verse that the companions of Muhammad in Medina objected to his act of marrying his adopted son’s wife. Being an unacceptable custom among the Arabs, it was a reasonable objection. To confront this objection, however, Allah sent down divine messages in the form of warning of his wrath upon those who make trouble for his beloved prophet.

The marriage between Zaid and Zainab was arranged by Muhammad himself. How come, a marriage that is convened by prophet himself was dissolved? Why Muhammad, the foreteller of the advent of Imam Mehdi and the day of judgment, did not perceive the conclusion of that marriage in the first place? Where was Allah, the knower of the past and future, who would prevent marriage between Zaid and Zainab? I know Muslims will claim that Muhammad knew only what Allah told him. This is an absurd claim; it further supports my reason to disdain Islam.

To learn more about the affair of Muhammad and Zainab, please visit the following site.
(3) Maria the Copt, sweetheart and sex slave of Muhammad

Maria, a Coptic Christian slave-girl, was another sweet heart of Muhammad. She became the sex-slave of the Prophet of Islam. According to Islamic sources, she was a very attractive young girl and she seduced Muhammad more than any of his wives. One day, Muhammad tried to send Hafsa (one of his wives) away, by telling that her father (Umar) wanted to see her. In the mean time, when Hafsa was out, Muhammad and Maria were alone in the house. This opportunity was a golden chance for Prophet of Islam to make his desire fulfilled without any disturbance. Allah was also happy, that his beloved prophet had some entertainment to ease him of his burden of the task entrusted to him for the benefit of mankind. Allah, the most wise and knower of the past and future, revealed verses to his beloved prophet to protect him and to confront the allegations from his wives.

Alone with Maria, in the house of Hafsa, the Prophet of Islam started to give glad tidings to Maria that if she made the Prophet happier, Allah would make her happy too, and she will never be miserable in her life and hereafter. As Maria heard this, she smiled and looked at the Prophet. This gesture of the former filled Muhammad’s heart and mind with love, passion and desire for her.

Hafsa retuned, annoyed that Muhammad had told her a lie. Unnoticed by Muhammad, she entered her room and discovered a lustful Prophet of Islam deeply engaged in sex with Maria. Hafsa saw her husband in bed with a slave-girl in such a position that she, as well as the entire Muslim Ummah could ever imagine. Muhammad became scared when Hafsa shouted at the Prophet who was enjoying a young girl. He did not expect Hafsa to return so soon. While the proud young and beautiful Maria was giggling on this scene, argument started between Muhammad and Hafsa. Muhammad tried his best to assuage Hafsa and keep her mouth shut. But Hafsa, as courageous and petulant as her father (Umar), rebuked Muhammad for his evil deed. Soon, Hafsa shared this story with Aisha, and they tried to tease the prophet of Islam by saying that his mouth stank of home-made alcoholic drink. Muslims try to defend Muhammad by claiming it was the smell of honey as Muhammad loved honey. Accordingly, after this affair, Muhammad never drank honey.

We should note that honey does not stink. It was, perhaps, the ‘honey’ that flowed between Maria’s legs that might had caused Muhammad’s mouth to stink.

To know more about this sordid act of Muhammad please visit:
(4) Muhammad’s followers jubilation on the massacre of Banu Quraiza tribe

The plunder of Khyber and the massacre of Banu Quraiza (a Jewish tribe of Medina) is another glorious feature of Islam. Soon after the battle of the Trench in 627AD, when the Muslims took control of Medina, they annihilated the entire Banu Quraiza tribe. Amidst cheers from his fanatic followers, Muhammad beheaded all the Banu Quraiza adult men and sold their women and children as slaves to raise money to buy war implements. Without any credible evidence, Muhammad alleged that the Banu Quraiza was in conspiracy with Quraish in Mecca against the Muslims in Medina.

Islamic history tells us that shortly after migrating to Medina, the Prophet of Islam and his followers adopted the way of loot and plunder of caravans of the merchants and traders. Holy Qur’an also depicts this abhorrent event especially in chapter 9 verse 5. These notorious behaviors of Muslims were not acceptable to some groups in Medina. Hence, they did not join Muhammad in their mission for what Allah the Al-Mighty wished. Consequently, the aggressive actions of Muslims caused the first battle of Badr in 624 AD. After this battle, the chain of other battles followed in the form of barbarism by Muslims.

As stated before, soon after the battle of the Trench, Muhammad pursued the Banu Quraiza Jews, killed their men, captivated their women and children, and divided their wealth and property among the Muslims. My question is:”Why were all men and adult boys of Banu Quraiza massacred in a dreadful way? Was it because the Jews did not aid Muhammad in the battle of the Trench? Was it because they conspired with the Quraish against the prophet of Islam?” If these reasons are valid, why did not Muhammad massacre all men of the Quraish on the day of conquest of Mecca? Who were the archenemies of Islam and Muhammad? I know Muslims will simply reply that the Quraish were spared because they took pledge on the hand of Muhammad, but the Jews of Banu Quraiza did not. I consider this argument false. The reason is that the Quraish were the family members of Muhammad, whereas the Banu Quraiza Jews were not. Had the Quraish been different tribe from Muhammad, I can say with certainty that they would have met even more horrendous fate than that of what happened to the Banu Quraiza. The Quraish brought many inflictions on Muhammad and his followers before and after their migration to Medina. It is widely known that the Prophet of Islam was by nature, a vindictive person. In spite of that, Muhammad spared the Quraish. This is a glaring example of injustice of the prophet of Islam.
(5) Muhammad’s confusion on facing the qiblas

Muslims claim that Kaaba (Muslim’s holy shrine in Mecca) was built by Abraham (the father of Ishmael and Isaac). According to them, Allah ordered Abraham to build a house of Allah for sanctuary, and warned him against idol worshipping. Hence, today, Muslims face Kaaba during their prayers. Many Muslims in Pakistan claim that the system of five daily prayers was ordained on Muslims when Muhammad undertook the journey of Miraj (a night journey to seven skies). Before Miraj, compulsory prayers were not ordained. The source from Ibn Ishaq tells us that in the early days of Islam, Muhammad, and his handful of followers started to offer prayers facing Kaaba. Later, in Medina, the Prophet of Islam and his companions started to offer their prayers facing Masjid-e-Aqsa (a mosque of Jews in Jerusalem) abandoning Kaaba. Again, after the 18th month of migration, Allah sent his divine messages, allowing his beloved prophet to turn his face back to Kaaba. So, while Muhammad and his companions were attentive in prayers, Muhammad turned his face from Masjid Aqsa to Kaaba.

We may ask: Why qiblas (facing towards shrine) were switched to Masjid-e-Aqsa and back to Kaaba if it was predestined that Abraham was the builder of Kaaba? This incidence proves that Muhammad and the Quraish never knew that Kaaba was ever built by Abraham. This is a big sin by Muhammad, because he turned his face from the shrine whose builder was Abraham. Today’s Muslims should realize it that Kaaba once was an old sanctuary for idols, and the idolaters had built Kaaba.
(6) Muhammad violated the treaty of Hudabya

Apparently, the treaty of Hudaybya was a peace treaty between the Quraish of Mecca and the Muslims of Medina. Feeling homesick and nostalgic after six or seven years away from their family members in Mecca, Muslims in Medina probably were disintegrating They became tired of Muhammad’s harangue and false promises of prosperity and divine bliss. They had had enough of Muhammad. Muhammad realized that to enthuse his crestfallen followers, he had to engage in warfare, to attack Mecca and take control of it. Consequently, he adopted deception and pretension to ascend to power. The treaty of Hudaibiya is an example of such trickery by Muhammad. The treaty of Hudaybya was a peace pact for the Quraish but not for Muhammad. Even before this treaty was signed Muhammad had already devised a plan to invade Mecca. Muslims claim that the Quraish violated the treaty. From Jarir Tabri resources it is clear that it was Muhammad who had violated that treaty.

The evidences cited above shows that the prophet of Islam was a coward who always adopted a way to attack his opponent from back and kill them in ambush. To Muhammad and his Allah, every promise and word of honor was meaningless. He was the only untrustworthy Prophet in the history of mankind who could do anything, beyond the limits, to make his own created Allah happier. This prophet was indeed a miscreant, a criminal, a womanizer, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and so on….



No comments:

Post a Comment