BASIS OF ISLAM AND JIHAD
Islam is based on fanatical
devotion to the Qur’an and Muhammad’s examples above everything else. Muhammad
used the most vile and horrible methods such as ethnic cleansing, secret
assassinations, kidnappings, robbery, deceit and cunning in the propagation of Islam and domination of other people.
Fighting jihad is prescribed for all Muslims (2.216). Jihad stands
on two legs. One is terror and the other is deception or Taqiyyah. Both are
essential for the advancement of Islam. Militants do jihad with violence and
moderates do jihad with Taqiyyah. Moderates hold you down infidels while
militants cut your throats.
Here are some opinions from scholars of Islam on how to solve the
Islam problem:
DR. WAFA SULTAN
Expose Islam
The pervasive political correctness in our society is an epidemic
of great proportions. With its moral relativism and multiculturalism, it leads
to a drastic decline of Western values, and if it continues unrestrained, it
may well lead to the destruction of Western civilization as we know it today.
Truth about Islam must be freely
disbursed to fight it.
NONNIE DARWESH:
Stop Political Correctness
The West must realize that it is not doing itself or the Muslim
world a favour by political correctness -- which actually has a negative effect
on Muslims trying to reform their system. Western PC is telling them we just
love you the way you are, terrorism, hate speech, good and bad, we still love
you. The West must demand reciprocity and equal treatment from Muslim
countries. If they build mosques in the US then we must have the right to build
a Church in Saudi Arabia and other Muslim countries. By accepting a one way
cultural impact from Islam, we are welcoming a disaster waiting to happen.
DR. HABIRA
A multi-lingual television channel should be launched with the
sole purpose of providing correct information about Islam and challenging its dogmas, where
apostates, critics, and reformers should have a voice to disseminate the truth
about Islam.
Removing Islam from the
category of religions and justly placing it as a dangerous political movement
is the only solution.
ABUL KASIM
It is impossible to negotiate or compromise with Islam to secure permanent peace (like
Israelis and Palestinians or Kashmir and India). Anyone having the slightest
humanism, conscience, and compassion should be appalled at the Islamic
theology. It is time that the entire humanity realizes the futility of engaging
in inter-faith dialogue with Islam. As long as the unbelievers are treated as
animals in Islam, it is not possible to have equal rights is Islamic societies.
We need the world to realize this truth and to unite together.
Truly, the world is permanently divided into two warring camps: the world of
humans (Islam) and the world of ‘animals’ (non-Islam). Without wasting time in
endless dialogues, let us accept this reality and do what we must do to defend
our freedom and civilization.
HUGH FITZGERALD
Stop Muslim immigration, make the country
Islam-unfriendly. Completely stop Muslim
immigration and make our countries Islam-unfriendly, thus presenting the
Muslims already here between the options of adapting to our societies or
leaving if they desire Shari’a law. Even whispering about Jihad should be
grounds for expulsion and revoking citizenship.
FJORDMAN
The real crime, and the real betrayal, would be to
sacrifice centuries of advances in human freedom as well as the future of our
children and grandchildren to appease Muslims who contribute virtually nothing
to our societies and are hostile to their very foundations.
The Sudeten Germans, some 3.5 million people, had
shown themselves to be a dangerous fifth column without any loyalty to the
state. The Czech government thus expelled them from its land in 1946. Muslims
in the west are Sudeten Germans of Csechslovakia. They must be handled the same
way.
ROBERT SPENCER
To protect ourselves, there should be a moratorium on Muslim
immigration, combined with a clear notice to Muslims in the United States that
any action on behalf of Shari’a should be punished under Section 2385.
Misinformation about Islam
must be eliminated and truth about Islam
spoken openly.
CRAIG WINN
Media and Press to Declare Islam Satanic
It is the duty of the media and press is to learn and to tell the truth about Islam they can learn all they want on www.prophetofdoom.net Once
people realize that Islam is a satanic
religion which is he the brainchild of a paedophile, a robber, rapist, killer Islam
will lose all sympathies and followers. prophetofdoom.net
GEERT WILDER
BAN THE QUR’AN
Islam is not a religion. It is a totalitarian ideology, a doctrine
of hate and violence. Qur’an tells Muslims what are they expected to do with
unbelievers: they are to be killed.
Qur’an stands at the heart of terrorism which in reality is their
Jihad. Problems of Islam are at the core of Islam, and do not belong to
its fringes. I have warned against the dangers of the Koran and Islam. Koran
must be banned like Mein Kampf, Islam
declared a non religion and the mass immigration of Muslims must be stopped
M.A.KHAN
SHAME
THEM OUT OF ISLAM
What might work, something that has not been tried,
is what I personally call 'shaming the Muslims out of Islam'. Islam is a horrible and shameful ideology,
unfit for the civilized world. But most Muslims, who are average human beings,
do not know what is actually in the Qur’an and Sunnah, or, they have never
analyzed the contents of Islam's fundamental texts critically. They have no
idea what it means to be a true Muslim and how shameful it is in the modern
civilized conscience. If they are made aware of the true nature of Islam, they
will leave this barbaric and dehumanizing cult in large numbers.Islam will be
condemned to the dustbin of history where it always belonged.
I think that this so-called moderate variety of
Muslims can easily be dissociated from Islam. What we need to do is to say the
truth that Islam is not a
"religion of peace" as goes the popular discourse, but a barbaric,
inhuman and uncivilized cult; that Muhammad was not a noble, a perfect man for
all time, but he was a brutal plunderer and mass-murderer lusting for power,
wealth and sex; that he was a sex-maniac with a pedophilic urge for a kid as
young as six when he was in his 50s and not far from death; that Islam, as initiated
by Prophet Muhammad, is a barbaric institution of imperialism, forced
conversion, and slavery and sex-concubinage. Islam, as depicted in its sacred
texts, is more horrifying than this.
What we need is to hold the pages of the Qur’an,
prophetic traditions and biographies, and Islamic history bare to Muslims and
to the world. This will be enough to shame the Muslims out of Islam.
DR. ALI SINA
There is only one realistic way: Stop Islam. This is a lot easier
than people think. Islam is a lie. All we have to do is expose this lie and
Muslims will walk away from it. No one wants to believe in a lie. Once we show
Muslims that Muhammad was a psychopath cult leader and that all his claims are
bogus, Islam will become a dead
religion in no time. I believe in the power of truth. Tell the truth and Islam will be destroyed in our own
lifetime.
Muhammad was a jackass. People who believe in
him are stupid. Let us call a spade as spade. These people must be
laughed at. They, and their screwball prophet have to be ridiculed
not respected. Let them cringe, let them wince, let them agonize. We must
demolish this fetish and break the shackles of these wretched people. They must
be set free and the only way to do that is to demolish their fetish.
Once Muhammad is ridiculed, once this talisman is destroyed, Muslims will be
liberated and they will leave Islam. When that happens they'll thank you.
It is not difficult to destroy Islam. Islam
is the pumped up ego of a megalomaniac psychopath. Muhammad was a narcissist
madman. Just as a huge balloon can be deflated by a small needle, all it takes
to make Islam explode is to ridicule its loony inventor and its brainless
followers.
I know the Muslim psychology. It is all pomposity and bravado. I give you my
word that if Islam is ridiculed
publicly and systematically, it will be defeated. Shame is a great
motivator as well as deterrent. Do not underestimate the power of
ridicule. This is serious stuff not a
laughing matter.
CONCLUSION
1. Declare Islam illegal and ban it like any other dangerous
ideology (i.e. KKK ideology) or a dangerous drug. Discuss Truth about Islam and Mohammed openly on mainstream media.
2. Ban Qur’an because it preaches hate discrimination and
violence. (like mein Kampf was
banned).
3. Shut down all mosques because they all teach Qur’an.
4. Stop Muslim immigration.
The above steps will not cost a penny, save billions in tax
benefits given to Islam/mosques, save billions in fighting terrorism, and
undermine Islam by taking away most of its practitioners and supporters by
exposing the truth about Islam, Qur’an and Mohammed which have been the
history’s best kept secrets. Muslims will not be able to come to the west and
the real Muslims living here will
leave because practicing a banned ideology will be looked down socially.
Source: http://www.faithfreedom.org/islam/only-way-stop-islam
IHS
The concept of apostasy, today practised only by Muslims, is shameful
stain on the conscience of humanity...
Whereas the practice of slavery enslaves the body; the dogma of apostasy ensnares
the mind. Whereas slavery is a shameful practice of the past, some shameless
religionists still use the doctrine of apostasy to intimidate and severely
punish people who elect to choose their own belief.
Islam is extremely possessive of its subjects. It is a religion that admits
anyone into its fold by the person simply uttering a one sentence statement of
faith, shahada: I bear witness that there is
no God but Allah and Muhammad is Allah’s messenger. By so saying, one becomes
Muslim for life and surrenders the right of ever leaving it. Anyone who leaves
the Islamic fold is murtad (revert), apostate.
The notion of apostasy is best understood within the overall Islamic dogma.
Islam forms a binding covenant with the believer. Once a person is Muslim, he
and his issues are considered Muslim forever. In this covenant, Islam promises
to bestow its beneficence on the faithful conditional on the person’s total and
unquestioned surrender to it in all matters. Some of the rewards offered by
Islam to the truly obedient believer, particularly the privileged males, are of
this world as well as a great deal more promised to him in the next. If a
Muslim faithful does not reap the rewards of his devotion in this world, Islam
assures him of his inestimably cherished and limitless compounded rewards in
the next world.
Islam demands subjugation of the individual’s will to that of Allah and
permeate the thinking, the actions and the speech of Muslims by prefacing
commitments they make contingent on the will of God (inshallah.)
This total surrender and submission to the will and decree of Allah also
absolves the individual from taking full responsibility for his conduct or
honoring commitments he may make. For it is Allah who has the unquestioned
authority to consummate or contravene any action or promise made by a faithful.
vWithin this overall framework of complete acceptance of Islam as the perfect
living charter for the believer, the rules pertaining to apostasy can be better
understood. Islam considers an apostate as a person who unilaterally breaks the
covenant he has made with the faith. An apostate is condemned as guilty of
turning his back on Allah’s immutable eternal religion. Anyone who is born to
Muslim parents and leaves Islam is stigmatized as murtad fitri (natural
apostate) in the sense that he was born genetically Muslim and he had rejected
his gift of birth. And anyone who converts to Islam and later leaves it is
condemned as murtad milli (a person who has turned his back to the Ummah).
The severe stricture against leaving Islam is consistent with other main
principle beliefs of the religion. Islam is a faith of surrender and not that
of a free will. A Muslim is to surrender his freedom of thoughts and actions to
the will and dictates of Allah. The very principle of freedom is alien to the
Islamic belief system.
With regard to apostasy, the two main branches of Islam, the Sunni and the
Shiite, are in considerable agreement. The great majority of Muslim scholars of
both major camps agree that the Quran stipulates death for the apostate.
Islam, by its very nature, is an all-encompassing belief system that proscribes
and prescribes every detail of the person’s and society’s conduct. The Sharia law, a comprehensive code of
Islamic jurisprudence, purportedly is based on the Quran, and the Hadith (the
reported enunciation of Muhammad and his conduct.)
Furthermore, Islamic societies rule by the Islamic laws of Sharia. Any new
societal legislation must be harmonious with those of the Sharia which are
conclusively anti-democratic. Sharia law is in explicit contradiction and
violation of the foundation of democracy. Sharia law places the dictates and
rules of Allah over the sovereignty of the people. It discriminates against
non-Muslims to the extreme of disenfranchising them from their rights of
citizenship of Baha'is
barring from jobs, higher education, worship, etc., not only in Iran but Saudi
Arabia, even Egypt. It is blatantly
discriminatory against women, Muslim or not. Men have greater claim to
inheritance, their testimony in the court of law is worth twice that of women
and they may marry multiple women at the same time. It stipulates even
different rules and privileges governing free Muslim men as opposed to slave
Muslims, implicitly condoning slavery. Saudi Arabia, the flagship of Islam, was
finally forced by the free world to abandon slavery, I believe, only in the
late 1960, but it has been reported that it has not been completely abandoned...
Apostasy is defined both in the Quran as well as the Sharia and its punishment
is clearly stipulated.
“Those who blasphemed and back away from
the ways of Allah and die as blasphemers, Allah shall not forgive them.”
[Qur'an 4:48]
Islamic law does not allow the freedom to choose one's religion.
“Let there be no compulsion in the
religion: Clearly the Right Path (i.e. Islam) is distinct from the crooked path.”
[Qur'an 2:256]
The Quran also specifically addresses the issue of murtad milli:
“But those who reject faith after they
accepted it, and then go on adding to their defiance of faith, never will their
repentance be accepted; for they are those who have (of set purpose) gone
astray.” [Qur'an 3:90]
The Hadith further restates the provision of the Quran regarding punishment of
the apostate.
The Sharia law stipulates that any Muslim who turns his back to Islam should be
given a chance to revert to the religion. For an un-repenting male apostate,
death is the punishment and life imprisonment for a female apostate.
“Kill whoever changes his religion.”
- Sahih al-Bukhari 9:84:57
“The blood of a Muslim who confesses that
none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that I am His Apostle, cannot
be shed except in three cases: In Qisas for murder, a married person who
commits illegal sexual intercourse and the one who reverts from Islam
(apostate) and leaves the Muslims.” - Sahih al-Bukhari 9:83:17
At present, apostasy is illegal in most Islamic countries. Although execution
of the apostate is not common, it does take place from time-to-time by
frequently buttressing the “crime” with additional charges. The Islamic
Republic of Iran, for instance, often adds the charge of mohareb (one who wars with God) to
further legitimize its execution of apostates. A case in point pertains to the
treatment of the religious minority Baha’is by the Islamic Republic. A number
of Baha’is have been charged as apostates
and mohareb, executed and some secretly buried in unmarked graves.
The late Ayatollah Khomeini in his Tahrir al-Wassilah adjudicates how a person’s
apostasy is established: “Apostasy is
proven in two ways: First, the person himself confesses to his apostasy twice.
Second, two just and truthful men bear witness to the person’s apostasy. But
women’s testimonies do not prove apostasy in any case; either they bear witness
individually, in a group or beside a man.”
The misogynic nature of Islam is once again evident in Ayatollah Khomeini’s
blanket disqualification of women’s testimony solely on the basis of gender.
“Apostasy-- or the formal renunciation
of religion -- is already punishable in Iran with death. But now, Iran wants to
make the death penalty for apostasy part of the penal code. The European Union
is concerned and has asked Iran to reconsider.” Who is an apostate according to
the legislation? Anyone in the world, not just Iranians, born to a Muslim
parent; also, any convert to Islam who leaves it. Only one parent needs to be a
Muslim at the time of conception for Islam to own that child for life. Islam is
Ummahist. Islam doesn’t recognize nationalities and national boundaries.
And these Islamist zealots are very serious and have no sense of humor. Some
say they have no sense at all, and they may be right. What they certainly have
is a thirst for blood, particularly for the blood of infidels and apostates.
It is noteworthy that Islam considers the world as its Ummah and overarches
national boundaries. Hence, Islamic clerics feel free to issue fatwa and other
adjudications regarding any person, groups or nations anywhere in the world. A
celebrated case of this practice was the fatwa of Ayatollah Khomeini against
the British author Salman Rushdie for his book the Satanic Verses. Hence, individual Muslims
anywhere in the world take it upon themselves to carry out fatwa issued by
Islamic high divines. In another high profile case, the killing of Theo
van Gough, a
Dutch film director and the recent attack on the Danish cartoonist, Kurt Westergaard, clearly
demonstrates this primitive practice that runs counter to the civilized world’s
due process and has serious intimidating impact on the freedom of expression.
Free people and nations should not sacrifice their God-given liberty to please
the Islamists by muzzling dissenters and even endangering their safety and
their lives.
The concept and practice of apostasy is a shameful stain on the conscience of
humanity. It is despicable for any belief system to stubbornly cling to the
dehumanizing anachronism of apostasy while its counterpart, slavery, is already
buried in mankind’s graveyard of past infamy.
Source: http://www.faithfreedom.org/islam/anachronism-apostasy
IHS
Continues
from Part II
Submitted by Ali Sina on Tue, 01/26/2010 - 10:10
Dear Ali Sina
I am in receipt of your E-mail
in response to my instantaneous rebuttal against your Anti Islamic propaganda.
Of course you are a person of
immense knowledge with a talented ability to frame heroes as villains or vice
versa.
As per your Web-site you are
an Ex – Muslim. Do you not find any faith/Religion worthy enough to be
practiced and propagated by you?
The impression I got is that
you still believe that Islam is the true Religion/faith and it is Islam Vs.
None. That prompted you to propagate Anti Islamic and Anti Muslim views.
In last let me concede that I
m an idiot learner. Even in my childhood days I learned through the stick not
by the teacher. So, I will continue to enlighten myself about Islam through
your Anti Islamic Website
Zameer Ahemd Jumlana
Dear Mr. Jumlana,
Thank you for your response. Let me correct you right off the bat that I am not
a person of immense knowledge. I have an insight into the mind of Muhammad and
that is what I am sharing. It resonates with my readers because it is based on
facts. My knowledge is far less than most Islamic scholars who have memorized
the Quran since childhood and have spent years in the madrassa reading the
hadith, all the tafseers and the fiqh. I had never read the Quran since I was
way into my adult life. The
difference is that I read it with an inquisitive mind and they read it as
believers. Therefore, I saw things that they overlook.
No one can frame a hero as a villain or vice versa. You can only deceive
people who want to be deceived. Dr, Zakir Naik is an expert in deception.
He has the ability to make Muslims believe that the most asinine verses of the
Quran are miracles. However, he cannot fool non-Muslims. In my online
book, The World’s
Greatest Showman, dedicated to him I have shown that virtually every
statement Dr. Naik makes is a lie. Deception is only self deception.
The reason my writings are read is because I am fair. I can be wrong, but I
never deliberately try to deceive my readers. I refrain from making claims that
I cannot prove. I present facts as facts and questions as questions and when in
doubt I say so.
As for religions I really don’t have any preference. I am an atheist humanist
but I don’t think atheism makes people any better or is the solution to world
problems.
I am not a believer because I do not see any evidence of the existence of God.
By “God” I mean the god of religions. The creation can be easily explained with
evolution and I see no evidence of a hearing, seeing caring God. I believe in a
principle that underlies the universe.
Over 200,000 innocent people lost their lives in Haiti and the most vulnerable
people on Earth are often hit by similar calamities. Where is God?
Does God see our suffering and does not care? Does he see it, wants to help but
he can’t? Or maybe, he does not know what is happening. Therefore, he is callous, impotent or
ignorant. Such God does not deserve our worship.
Suffering does not end with human misery. It is woven into the fabric of the
universe. Why should any loving God design the world in such a way that the
sustenance of some creatures must necessity depend on the destruction of the
lives of many others? The most cynical part is that these creatures that are
destined to be food are endowed with senses and feelings. They suffer
excruciating pains before becoming snacks and those who survive them suffer
untold sorrow. When a deer loses her calf, her anguish is no less than the
anguish we humans feel for the loss of our children. If truly this universe is
designed by a god, he must be utterly cruel.
Jews and Christians reason that the suffering in the world is the result of
Adam and Eve’s disobedience. This belief is rehashed in the Quran also. By
doing so they are in effect acknowledging that God is unjust. How can a just
and loving god, punish thousands of generations and millions of species in land
and sea because one couple ate an apple without permission? Is this punishment
commensurate with the offence? Is it
fair that entire world suffer because one guy stole an apple? And we are
supposed to believe that such god is wise, just and forgiving?
Because our foolish progenitors could not control their stomach, God kicked
them out of paradise, unleashed Satan to prey on their descendants and made all
creatures devour each other. And we
are supposed to, day and night worship this insane god and praise his justice,
mercy and compassion.
Why do we humans want to fool ourselves? Well, it is because we need to
believe. A couple of months ago my sister found out that her daughter had a tumour
in her brain that required the most dangerous surgery. Her life was shattered.
The Doctors told her to be ready for the worse or the possibility that she
could become blind. She called me and said, please pray. I said, you know I
don’t believe in prayers. She said that she needs to believe.
I was devastated by the news. I wanted to do something. But what? I wanted to
ask someone to please take me instead. But I felt helpless. It was then that
I saw that believers are blessed. They can cling to a god and keep their
hope alive. I wish I could believe too, but I can’t.
If you can believe in God, you should. Believers are happier in general.
It is comforting to believe someone listens to your prayers, takes care of you
and will not abandon you in the dark moments of your life. The belief in God is placebo. Sometimes
placebos save life. Placebo works as long as you don’t know the truth about it.
Alas, I know the truth about God.
However, despite being an atheist I often preach God to those whom I believe
will benefit from it. I live in a
Christian country so I preach Christianity. I used to go to a Church. Some
churches are really good. Unlike mosque that is saturated with anger and hate
there is often happiness and friendship in the air. There is nothing wrong in
believing in God as a helping hand and as long as that belief brings out the
best of you.
But be wary of the downside of belief too. A few days ago, famous American
televangelist Pat Robertson said the deadly Haitian
earthquake that killed over 200,000 people was God's vengeance for a
"pact" Haitians swore to the Devil to set them free from slavery over 200
years ago. Since then, he said, Haiti has been cursed by "one thing after
the other."
What is the message in this remark? That God wanted the blacks to remain
slaves. They had to enlist the help of Devil to gain their freedom, which
angered God who has been hitting those helpless people ever since with one
curse after another.
Why would God want to keep the blacks in slavery? Assuming the ancestors of
Haitian made a pact with Devil, those guys are dead. Why would a sane God
punish their descendants? And more importantly, why should anyone help someone
whom God has cursed and wants to punish?
The Quran is full of stories like this. The destruction of Aad by Allah is one
such story. Muhammad was not a rational person to realize attributing such
thing to God is attributing insanity to the Creator. He was an ignorant man
with little intelligence. He believed in every absurdity he heard and parroted
it in his own book.
As long as God means hope, it is good. Life
without hope is hell. If the love of God makes you a Mother Theresa, there is
nothing wrong in it. Whether God exists or not, is secondary. The teachings of
Jesus are good. But when the belief in God becomes an excuse to hate, it is
evil. Let me explain this with an example.
I generally don’t buy lottery tickets. I know the chance of winning is so low
that I rather have a cup of coffee with my two bucks (or toony, as we call it
in this part of the world). However, when the jackpot grows larger than 20
million dollars I buy a ticket. The chance of winning has not increased, and I
don’t really count on winning. However, this allows me to dream for a few days.
I think to myself what would I do with millions of dollars? Maybe I expand
fatihfreedom.org, publish literatures in all languages and help Muslims all
over the world to leave Islam, maybe I make a movie about Muhammad, and for
sure I would take my old parents to a cruise around the world. I buy a ticket,
to dream. However, it would be lunacy if I spend my life saving on lottery
tickets considering it an investment.
We humans need to dream and have hopes. If
the belief in God gives you hope, there is nothing wrong in it. The problem is
that some people take that belief too seriously They wage war in the name of God,
discriminate against others, murder people, or just write to police and try to
take people’s freedom of speech away from them. Some even blow up their own
bodies. They do all these with clear conscience and convinced to be right.
Muslims are told Jihad is the fastest way to heaven. This is lunacy. Muhammad lied. It is this lie that I am
trying to expose. But to do that I have to show that he was a liar and his
entire message is a lie. It is okay to
believe in God, but don’t bet your life on it.
No Sir! I don’t believe Islam is the true religion. I believe all religions
have a kernel of truth in then except Islam. There is goodness in every
religion, but there is none in Islam. I believe Islam is the most diabolic
belief ever invented. It is far more dangerous than Nazism. Islam is evil. It is sheer darkness. It
is a curse on humanity.
If I believed in God and his divine comedy I would have said Islam is the
instrument of Satan to destroy mankind, but since I am a rationalist, I believe
Muhammad was a pathological narcissist. That man was insane. I invite you
to read my book and evaluate my evidence. You
be the judge.
I promote the truth about Islam because it is a threat to the world. In my
previous response to you I showed how Islam was the inspiration behind the evil
movements that devastated the world. Today, we are facing a bigger danger. If
Nazism, Communism, fascism, inquisition, and Mafia were inspired by Islam,
today, it is Islam itself that has raised its ugly head to destroy mankind.
Islam is the mother of all evils. All good people of the world, whether they
believe in God or not, must unite and slay this beast.
As to your last point, let me assure you that you are not an idiot. Bertrand
Russell said, the problem with the world is that fools are always sure and wise
people are full of doubt. The very fact that you would say such thing is
proof that you belong to the latter group. I receive plenty of emails from
fools and idiots who write to threaten me with the torments in the grave and
hellfire, but have nothing to say in defence of Islam. You are not one of them.
Ali Sina
PS. Some people wrote to express their concern about my niece. Thanks for your
concerns. The operation was a success and my beautiful niece is completely
fine. Thank God! ;-)
Source: http://www.faithfreedom.org/islam/formal-complaint-against-ffi-part-iii
IHS
Continues from Part I
Dear Mr. Ali
Sina,
I have just
checked your reply to my e-mail to Commissioner of Police, Delhi regarding your
website.
I had sent
this complaint to police as an Indian National not as a Muslim only. Noted
Painter M.F. Hussain is living in exile due to his condemnable naked paintings
of Hindu God & Goddesses. And criminal cases are pending against him all
over India for hurting the sentiments of Hindu Community.
Before
making a Para wise reply to your email there are a few questions which comes
out in my mind instantaneously while going through your email.
- Whether
girl child were buried alive in Arabs during pre-Prophet era or not?
- Do the
women have any right in property in pre-Prophet era?
- Who
destroyed the Mosques in Spain, Russia & China?
- Who is
responsible for Tianamin Square Massacre in China?
- Do the
Israeli and Mynmar governments are not violating human rights?
All I want
to say that it is the so called followers of each and every faith and religion
had committed atrocities and human right violations against the preaching of
their respective religions. Do their religions (code of conduct) can be blamed
for their sinful acts?
Dear Mr.
Sina, Anybody can practice any faith but I dissent with you that one have
any right to abuse/distort the preaching’s of any religion/ex-religion. I
have sincere intention to convince you and your website visitors to bring them
back in the fold of Islam.
Yours,
Zameer Ahmed Jumlana
Dear Mr. Zameer Ahmed Jumlana,
Thank you for your reply. It was a pleasant surprise to hear from you.
Generally, I don’t hear back from Muslims. They throw a stone and run. So let
me commend your integrity.
As for respecting other people’s belief, please understand that it is a
fallacy. Beliefs don’t have to be
respected. No belief is sacrosanct, above criticism or even ridicule. This is
the only way we humans advance our understanding. All beliefs, whether
scientific, religious or philosophical must be open to probing and criticism.
If a belief demands respect and cannot tolerate criticism that belief has to be
criticized vehemently.
Prosecuting or threatening an artist for disrespecting someone’s belief is
sickening. However, let us be fair. Hindus were not originally violent and
intolerant. Generally speaking they still are the most tolerant people. If
you see a group of Hindus are becoming radicalized it is because they are
reacting to Islamic aggression. The violence and the intolerance that you
see in some Hindus is not part of their religious teaching, it is their
reaction to Islamic violence. In a sense, they are inspired by the violence
of Islam. You can call them "Muslim Hindus" or "Islamized
Hindus."
In his book Holy
Warriors: Islam and the Demise of Classical Civilization John O’Neill argues that much of
Christian violence, such as Crusades and inquisition were the influences of
Islam on the Church. Many of the secret societies, like the Shriners, The
Rosicrucians, the Freemasons, the illuminati and even the Mafia owe their
organizational structure to Ismail sect of Islam and its order of Assassins.
Also communism is inspired by Islam. The concept of a world government under
one dictator that is the core of Marxism is an adaptation of caliphate. Nazism also owes its world view to Islam. Muhammad
told his followers that they are superior because of their faith. Hitler
advocated the superiority of a race. On several occations Hitler expressed
his admiration for Muhammad.
Thoughts are viral. We humans influence each other’s thinking. Ideas pass from
one person to another. They mutate in their new habitat and adapt to the
circumstances.
In his book The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History Michael H. Hart ranks Muhammad at the top of all the
people who influenced the world. I do not dispute that claim. However, I also recognize
that that influence has been the cause of much evil on Earth. Hundreds of
millions of deaths, directly or indirectly, are owed to the influence of
Muhammad on the world. When Christians say the world is ruled by the Prince
of Darkness, there is a symbolic truth in it. Can you think of the most
evil things in the history of mankind? Fascism, Communism, Nazism, the
crusades, the inquisition, the organized crime, and the secret societies were
all, in one way or other, byproducts of Islam.
So it is shortsighted to blame Hinduism for denying freedom of speech and
expression to a Muslim painter in India. This intolerance is not inspired by
Hinduism. What you see is the reflection of the intolerance of Islam. It is
ironic that despite their claim of hating Islam, Hindu extremists are
influenced by Muhammad’s evil spirit and are indeed Muslims. It is not their
belief that makes them Islamists, but their conducts.
Now let me answer your questions
- Whether girl child were buried
alive in Arabs during pre-Prophet era or not?
Female infanticide is the intentional killing of infant girls. In addition to the active
methods undertaken to eliminate baby girls soon after birth, neglect and
discrimination leading to death and sex-selective abortion are also means by
which many female children die each year. These phenomena are most prevalent in
patriarchal societies in which the status of women is low and a preference for
sons is built into the cultural ideology.
Female
infaniticide cuts across all social and economic boundaries. Thus, the practice
involves a wide range of location-specific and culturally-motivated causes. In
rural and poverty-stricken areas, lack of education, economic resources, and
access to healthcare are factors that lead to the murder of infant girls. In
urban areas, selective abortion is commonly employed by individuals with access
to modern medical technology that allows for early detection of sex.
This
practice is not condoned or tolerated by any government. There are punitive
measures to discourage female infanticide. India
and China, two of the most populous countries today, top the list of nations in
which these atrocities are carried out. However
you cannot say that this evil practice is wide spread in either one of these
countries.
Arabia
was and still is a patriarchal society. But it does not mean everyone practiced
female infanticide. Had this been the case no woman would have been left. The fact that some men could afford to have several women shows the
claim that infanticide was a widespread practice prior to Islam is a gross exaggeration.
The truth
is that humans instinctively love babies, and more so their own. What
Muhammad said was commonsense. Saying something as banal as this does not make
one a prophet. Ask any criminal whether infanticide is good and he will tell
you that it is abhorrent. Muhammad committed crimes that many criminal will
not commit, such as raiding people’s homes at night, butchering unarmed men and
raping their wives and daughters. Don’t
judge a man by his words but by his deeds. Muhammad preached a lot of good
things that are commonsense but his actions were demonic. He often violated his
own preaching.
- Did women have any right in
property in pre-Prophet era?
Of
course they did! Wasn’t Khadijah a successful merchant and the wealthiest woman
of Mecca prior to marrying Muhammad? As a single woman she ran a business and
hired men to work for her. Muslims are so immersed in lies that they can’t
see the obvious.
Arab women lost their human rights after Islam. At the time of
Muhammad there was a woman prophetess called Sijjah. She had many followers. This is inconceivable for Muslims
whose prophet told them women are deficient in intelligence and because of
menstruation they are filthy. Salma
was a young woman who lead an army against Khalid ibn Walid and was defeated
thanks to the coward unchivalry of that villain general of Islam. Aisha also led an army
against Ali. Early believers followed a woman to war. Today Muslim women in
Saudi Arabia don't have the right to drive a car.
Eventually, as the influence of Islam spread, and words of Muhammad such as “no
Nation will prosper under a woman’s leadership” were accepted as true, women
lost their status and today, they are called awrat (pudendum). They have to be covered
from head to toe because every sqyare inch of their body is private part -
an en extension of their vagina. Isn’t hijab the biggest insult to women?
Muslim women are not regarded as humans but as waking talking vaginas. That is
what awrat means and that is
why they must be covered. Don’t let anyone fool you. Hijab has nothing to do
with modesty. It is devised to cover women because they are perceived as awrat - objects of shame.
In Islam women are the property of men. The Quran gives men permission to beat
them and Muslim societies condone and even encourage “honor” killing them.
Women are killed for Muslim men to restore their honor.
Who destroyed the Mosques in Spain,
Russia & China?
As I said before, people of all faiths are reacting to Islamic violence and
are retaliating. The destruction of Babri Mosque, for example, was in
effect a reaction of Hindus to Islamic expansionism. They destroyed the
mosque because it was built on the site where the temple of Ayodhaya that
commemorated Rama’s birthplace had ones stood. That temple was destroyed by the
Muslim governor Mir Baqi in 1527.
Everywhere you see a mosque is destroyed you can find a trail of blood that
leads to Islamic violence and jihad. The Serbian war against the Kosovo and
Bosnia was a reaction to centuries of abuse by Muslims. There is a tower made
of human sculls built by Muslim invaders of Serbia. Finally the Serbs snapped.
That is not to condone what they did, but to explain where this hatred
originated.
Let us be fair and look beyond the events and into their root causes. The
root cause of most evil perpetrated in the world can be traced to Islam. Most
of the problems affecting mankind were caused by that Prince of Darkness born
in the seventh century Arabia.
Today, Chinese are reacting to Muslims. On the surface this looks like another
case of human rights abuses that the Chinese government is known for. But
beneath that lies a history that needs to be taken into consideration. Arab,
Persian and Uyghur Muslims came to China as merchants and were received well.
But being Muslims they did not mix with the Hans, the proper Chinese. When the
Mongols invaded China, Muslims cooperated with them to keep the Hans in the
second class status in their own country. The Mongols, whose own ideology of
domination through violence matched that of Muhammad, brought many Muslim
immigrants to China and employed them as administrators to control the Hans.
Today, Muslims in China demand autonomy and secession. But as far as Chinese
are concerned these people are immigrants and invaders. It is normal for the
Chinese to be defensive and protective or their country.
There are many parts of Europe that are no-go zones for non-Muslims. Muslim
immigrants have taken these quarters and not even police is allowed to go
there. The Europeans have become euphemized and are incapable to defend their
countries, but Chinese are still patriotic. Hence, the harsh reaction.
Who is responsible for Tianamin
Square Massacre in China
Tiananmen Square massacre was perpetrated by the Chinese communist regime.
Communism, like Islam, is a plague that has to be eradicated. As I argued
above, all these plagues have their roots or their inspirations in Islamic
ethos of world domination. Every ideology of domination, that divides mankind
into us versus them that instils in its followers the hatred of the outsider,
that aspires to dominate the world dictatorially, has its ideological root in
Islam. Most evil in the world is inspired, directly or indirectly, by the
monster of Arabia.
I see all these as symptoms. The disease is the ideology of Islam. I am not
interested in symptoms. My goal is to eradicate the disease. Once Islam and
Islamic way of thinking, the thinking that divides mankind into us versus them
that rouses the insiders against the outsiders that is founded on hate and on
disunity is eradicated, these symptoms will also disappear.
I want to see a world where no one is seen as them, where all mankind is seen
as us, members of one human family, cells of one body. This is possible, but to
get to this noble goal we have to get rid of ideologies that divide us. Islam
is the inspiration behind all ideologies of hate. That is why I am after Islam.
Do the Israeli and Mynmar
governments are not violating human rights?
Mynmar government is dictatorship. I don’t know of any dictatorship
that does not violate human rights. But Israel is a democracy. Israel
does not violate human rights. She is however, under severe negative
propaganda attack by Muslims and their liberal helpers. Israel is vilified and
demonized with calumny and libel out of political expediency. An Arab proverb says, things are known by their
nemesis. Look who are the nemesis of Israel: Ahmadinejad and
his murderous regime, the terrorists of all persuasions, the Hamas, the
Hizbollah, the al Qaida, and virtually all Muslims that believe in the
Prince of Darkness, the Nazis, the KKK, the while supremacists, the black
supremacists and the hard core communists. These folks are not good people. I am not a moral relativist. I do
not believe all cultures are the same. There are cultures and beliefs that are
evil and those who believe in them do evil things.
If you pay close attention, you can see the world is divided in two camps: On
the left there are those who believe in evil ideologies of hate and have
separated themselves from the rest and on the right there are those who believe
all men are equal. The former groups believe good and bad people can be
differentiated by their adherence to certain race, belief or doctrine, While
the latter group believe good and evil are determined by the content of one’s
character and one's deeds.
It happens that all the enemies of Israel belong to the former group, the
dividers of mankind and the hate mongers. I
prefer to be part of the latter group. That is why I am with Israel and a
Zionist. I use this term deliberately because Muslims don’t know what it
means. They are brainwashed to believe Zionist is something evil. Zionist is
one who believes Jews have the right to have a country of their own. I believe
in that.
I invite you to see two short videos. One is about Israel being the first
country to get to disaster areas of the world helping the victims irrespective
of their belief or race and the other is how Israel has become the victim of
vicious lies motivated by appeasement of Muslims and political correctness.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snH738Umhqc
http://www.pjtv.com/v/2978
At no time the demarcation between good and evil was clearer than now.
Those who follow evil doctrines, have divided the world, promote lies and
foment hate, are all enemies of Israel. This country must do something right to
arouse the wrath of all hate mongers and evil doers. Our mission in FFI is to stop them, to make
them see their folly and to bring them back to the fold of humanity. I invite
you also to join us.
If any religion advocates hate and violence that religion has to be
condemned. It is a mistake to grant immunity to any doctrine of hate just
because it brands itself as religion. Assuming God exists and sends
messages, His messages must be messages of love and unity. It can't be
another way. If anyone foments discord that person is not from God, but an
impostor or worse an envoy of Satan that has come to bring sedition war and
destruction to mankind.
If a religion preaches love and its
followers wage war, that religion is not to be blamed, but if a religion
glorifies fighting and prescribes it as the most lofty act of worship and the
fastest way to heaven that religion is to be blamed. Islam is evil
because of what Muhammad said and did. I cannot say the same about any other
religion.
Anyone must have the right to abuse and to distort any belief. What you
perceive as distortion and abuse is honest understanding of someone else.
The demand that no one should distort and abuse any belief is the
source of all evil. We
all have different understanding of reality. Our beliefs are shaped by our
upbringing, external influences and our mental capacity. Everyone is convinced
of their belief. What you believe is most certainly contrary to someone else’s
belief. Your understanding of an object or a subject may be very different from
mine. That is because we see the same thing from different perspectives. It is
fine that we should not agree with each other, but if I accuse you of
distorting the truth and you accuse me of the same, if I demand that you should
shut up and you do the same, the only way left for us to resolve this impasse
is to go in war.
Do you see how we have fooled ourselves with a lie and condemned ourselves
to perpetual war? The idea that
belief should not be criticized is lunacy. Millions have perished because of
this stupid idea while fighting to defend faiths that could not be defended
logically.
Who are you to tell me that I should not distort your belief? Who said your
belief is not distorted and mine is? From where I stand it is you who have
distorted beliefs. Do I have the right to tell you to shut up? This is the most ludicrous dogma that humans
have invented. We may also owe that to Muhammad. Beliefs don’t need
protection of the law. They can and they should be criticized. If they are
true they can withstand every criticism and distortions. It is lies that require
protection. When you wrote to authorities asking them to stop me, unknowingly
you witnessed to the fallacy of Islam. Now that you are engaging in debate you
are demonstrating your conviction that Islam is true. Truth can spark when
differing ideas collide.
Beliefs don’t have rights. Humans have rights. Part of that right is to criticize any belief.
Muslims do that all the time. Don’t you criticize trinity? Don’t you believe
that Jesus was not crucified? These beliefs are contrary to Christianity. They
offend the true believers. But it does not stop you. And it shouldn’t. You
should be free to express your beliefs even if Christians are offended. What
you are not allowed to do is to burn churches, destroy synagogues and temples. Why
Muslims do this? It is because Muhammad did it. Muhammad rammed into Ka’ba and
destroyed that temple. So Muslims follow the evil example set by their prophet.
Then you complain when sometimes other retaliate. You only see the retaliation
part. What you fail to see is that all this started with Muhammad. It is
the influence of that demonic soul that is causing so much mayhem in the world.
We must be free to say what we believe. Of course we cannot agree on
everything. Of course both of us are convinced that the other guy does not
understand the truth and is distorting it. That is fine. If truth is on our
side we should not be afraid of criticism.
Can Islam stand criticism? It can’t. That proves that it is a lie. But you
disagree with me. You say I am distorting the facts. In that case please show
us that distortion. Once you prove I am mistaken, I will join the fold of
Islam, but so far no one has been able to do it.
Source: http://www.faithfreedom.org/islam/formal-complaint-against-ffi-part-ii
Continues on Part III
IHS
Submitted by Ali Sina on Sun, 01/17/2010 - 07:17
The
following is a complaint made against faithfreedom International by Mr. Zameer
Ahmed Jumlana, Secretary of All India Committee, Indian National League, to the
Commissioner of Delhi Police, India.
To the desk of Y. S. Dadwal, Commissioner of
Delhi Police, INDIA.
CC. faithreedom International
My attention is being drawn about
Anti-Islamic provocative website www.faithfreedom.org . I personally check the website which
contains the Alleged Pictures of Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be upon Him) which are
forbidden according to teachings of Islam. The Life History of Prophet Muhammad
(Peace Be upon Him) is also described at the said website in a much distorted
manner. What is more objectionable is that Anti-Islamic propaganda is done by
imposing them as ardent Muslim.
I am optimistic that a swift legal action will be taken against the above
identified website.
Zameer
Ahmed Jumlana (Secretary All India Committee, Indian National League) Mobile:
9811531096
Dear
Mr. Zameer Ahmed Jumlana,
Showing
the pictures of Muhammad is forbidden by the teachings of Islam. However, we are
not Muslims and we do not abide by the teachings of Islam. Isn’t it absurd that
you expect everyone to live by your dictums?
Muslims
are in violation of the laws that are the hallmark of the civilized people,
such as the Golden Rule, the Human Rights, the equality of genders, the freedom
of speech, the freedom of belief, etc. These are the laws that matter to us.
They don’t matter to you, because they are not part of your laws.
Just
as you file a complaint against us for violating your laws, we are taking you
to court for violating our laws.
Which
court? The court of the public
opinion! It is in this court that we are exposing the deception, the violence,
and the hate that is so intrinsic in the religion that you espouse. We are
fighting the lies of Islam with truth and winning the minds and hearts of
thousands of people, both Muslims and non-Muslims.
Can
you defend Islam? Can you prove that what we allege against your faith and its
monstrous prophet are untrue? No you cannot. When it comes to logic you are
helpless. You cannot defend your evil belief with logic. There is nothing you can do, but to
bring legal charges to stop us from revealing the truth about your cherished
faith.
You
can’t. There is no law that can stop us from telling the truth about any faith,
at least not where I live. Here we practice freedom of speech and criticizing
religions, including Islam is our birth right.
This
is the freedom that you Muslims have always enjoyed, but have denied to others.
You think it is okay to destroy churches, synagogues, temples and the houses of
worships of other faiths, trash their religions and criticize them. You think
it is okay for your prophet to call the Jews, maghdhoob (hated by God), the
Christians, gone astray and the Hindus, polytheists and najes (filthy), but you
cry like a baby when someone criticizes your faith.
Seven innocent Baha’is in
Iran are being prosecuted, as I write these notes. They may face execution,
because they are accused of “waging war against God and spreading corruption on
Earth.” The punishment for these offences in Islam is death. You are not
offended by this gross violation of human rights, but you are offended if we
show the pictures of Muhammad?
Have
you ever thought why Muhammad disallowed his followers to depict him? In his
later years, Muhammad suffered from the degenerative disease of achromegaly.
Thanks to this disease his bones and cartilages grew disproportionately. His facial features were deformed. He
looked like a monster. But Muhammad
was also a narcissist and he was very concerned about his image. Consequently,
he forbade his followers to depict him. He did not want the posterity to see
how ugly he looked. If you want to really know how Muhammad looked, please read
my book, Understanding Muhammad: A
Psychobiography of Allah’s Prophet. I have unearthed his description,
narrated by his nearest and dearest.
You
went on to accuse us of “imposing” anti-Islamic propaganda on ardent Muslims.
Really? Have we ever called for jihad against ardent Muslims? Have we said
anywhere that Muslims should recant their faith, pay jizyah, or they should be
killed? Where is this imposition you are talking about? You fail to see that
Muhammad imposed his diabolic faith on others through his numerous ghazwas
(raids), that your ancestors and mine were massacred, raped and forced into
conversion, but you see an Internet site as an imposition? If a Muslim does not
want to read our site, all he has to do is click out of it. Can a Muslim who
does not want to remain a Muslim click out of his faith? What will happen to
him if he does? Can non-Muslims living in Islamic countries practice their
faith freely? Have you read about the recent violence against the Copts in Egypt?
Have you heard of innocent Muslims in Pakistan accused of blasphemy and lynched
by Muslim goons?
Your
ancestors, like mine, were butchered and raped by marauding Muslims, and now
you are defending the barbaric faith of their abusers? You and I don't owe any allegiance
to the demonic faith of the murderers of our ancestors. Wake up Mr. Jumlana.
Don't betray your own people, your own ancestors, and your own culture. Have
you become the defender of a cult that destroyed them? Instead of defending the
filthy cult of a monster you should defend your own culture. You are a Hindu,
Be proud of your heritage that has contributed to humanity so much.
It is amazing how Muslims can be so genuinely hypocritical. You accuse us of
something that befits Islam. FFI does not have means of torture to impose
anything. Any time a Muslim can’t handle us, relief is a click away. But they
are coming. They are reading what we write and they are leaving Islam. We do
not impose our views, but the truth is compelling.
Well,
Mr. Zameer Ahmed Jumlana. Unlike Muslims I am a
fair person and would like to give you the opportunity to defend your faith. Show
us that Islam is a religion from God and not an idiotic faith concocted by a
mentally and physically sick individual. Prove us wrong and I will not only
publish your rebuttal, but also announce publicly that I was wrong and even
will give you $50,000 dollars as reward.
That
is not all. I am going to do something that is inconceivable for Muslims and
may even shock the non-Muslims. We have a blog section in this site. I am going
to let Muslims to run their blogs. Yes that is right! From today, I announce
that the blog section of FFI is open to all those who want to prove us wrong. We
are working on a new application for this site that will be easier to use. It
will be launched in about a week. I am going to create a new chapter in the
blogs section for Muslims to respond to all the charges made against Muhammad
and Islam.
How
about that for freedom of speech? Of course Muslims have been always free to
post anything in the forum and in the comments section of faithfreedom.org, but
now they can also write blogs refuting FFI right on FFI. Show me one Islamic
site that allows opposing comments, let alone giving their critics blogs to
refute them.
So,
Dear Mr. Jumlana, instead of crying like a baby and complaining to authorities,
please act maturely and start refuting what you believe are “distortions” in
our site.
This
offer is open to all Muslims. Muslims can now have their own blogs to refute us
on FFI. I have a hunch that their blogs will be very popular, provided they
write scholarly articles. But be also prepared to be debunked and refuted. You
are free to write anything and you readers are free to comment and show your
errors.
There
are some conditions.
1- You
must not use copy pasted articles from other writers. What you publish on FFI
must be your own writing.
2- Your
articles must be in response to the charges made against Muhammad. The intent
is to prove FFI is wrong and Islam is indeed a true religion.
Are
you up to the challenge? If we are distorting the facts, as you accuse us, it
should be easy for you to prove us wrong. The antidote to lies is truth. Show
us the truth and debunk everything we say, in
konta men al sadeqeen.
By
searching your name in Google, I see you are a professional complainer to
authorities and an avid lawsuit maker. But I did not find any scholarly article
penned by you about Islam. I hope you will be able to defend your faith
logically now that you have exposed yourself to all and sundry. Don’t try to bully the
critics of Islam to silence, it won’t work anymore. Instead try to refute them
wrong, if you can.
Wish
you the best
Ali
Sina
Source:
http://www.faithfreedom.org/islam/for4mal-complaint-against-ffi
Continues on Part II
IHS
